Skip to main content
Log in

What is the End Point of Psychotherapy Integration? A Commentary

  • Published:
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration

Abstract

This commentary on six papers about assimilative integration considers the place assimilative integration, as defined by Messer, ought to have in the discussion on psychotherapy integration. After briefly summarizing the contribution of each paper, with particular attention to whether the paper takes a position on the end point of psychotherapy integration, the author compares the relative benefits of assimilative integration to those of a unified grand theory. He argues that assimilative integration, as an end point, is preferable to a unified grand theory because it has a more generative influence on both theory evolution and clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Lazarus, A. A., & Messer, S.B. (1991). Does chaos prevail?Anexchange on technical eclecticism and assimilative integration. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 1, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, S. B. (1992). A critical examination of belief structures in integrative and eclectic psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 130–165). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisch, E.S. What is the End Point of Psychotherapy Integration? A Commentary. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 11, 117–122 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026685109845

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026685109845

Navigation