Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-Term Effectiveness of Combined Spine Surgery and Functional Restoration: A Prospective Study

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was designed to evaluate whether chronic low back pain patients who underwent surgery combined with functional restoration (n = 43) would demonstrate comparable 1-year socioeconomic outcomes, relative to those patients who had not undergone surgery (n = 25). This represents the first investigation of patients who underwent spine surgery, followed immediately by a comprehensive functional restoration program. The study prospectively evaluated these two groups of consecutive patients, culminating in a structured clinical interview 1 year after program completion in order to assess socioeconomic outcomes. Results demonstrated that the two groups were comparable in terms of return-to-work rates, as well as self-reported satisfaction and perceived helpfulness of the treatment program. Thus, in spite of the common assumption that spine surgery patients fare poorly, especially in a workers' compensation environment, these findings show that such patients will display successful objective outcomes if surgery is accompanied by effective rehabilitation such as functional restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Haider TT, Kishino ND, Gray TP, Tomlin MA, Daubert HB. Functional restoration: Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical spine patients. J Occup Rehab 1998; 8: 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer T, McMahon MJ, Gatchel RJ, Sparks B, Wright A, Pegues P. Socioeconomic outcomes of combined spine surgery and functional restoration in workers' compensation spinal disorders with matched controls. Spine 1998; 23: 598–605; discussion 606.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas S, Deyo R, Keller R, Chapin A, Patrick D, Long J, Singer D. The Maine lumbar spine study, part II. One year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica. Spine 1996; 21: 1777–1786.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer TG, Prescott M, Gatchel RJ. Objective outcomes evaluation: Methods and evidence. In: Mayer TG, Gatchel RG, Polatin PB, eds. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Function, outcomes, and evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frndak PA, Berasi CC. Rehabilitation concerns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med 1991; 12: 338–346.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moffet H, Richards CL, Malouin F, Bravo G, Paradis G. Early and intensive physiotherapy accelerates recovery postarthroscopic meniscectomy: Results of a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kishino, N.D., Polatin, P.B., Brewer, S. et al. Long-Term Effectiveness of Combined Spine Surgery and Functional Restoration: A Prospective Study. J Occup Rehabil 10, 235–239 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026670503948

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026670503948

Navigation