Skip to main content
Log in

Regularity in Quantum Logic

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1996, Harding showed that the binarydecompositions of any algebraic, relational, ortopological structure X form an orthomodular poset FactX. Here, we begin an investigation of the structuralproperties of such orthomodular posets of decompositions.We show that a finite set S of binary decompositions inFact X is compatible if and only if all the binarydecompositions in S can be built from a common n-arydecomposition of X. This characterization ofcompatibility is used to show that for any algebraic,relational, or topological structure X, the orthomodularposet Fact X is regular. Special cases of this result include the known facts that theorthomodular posets of splitting subspaces of an innerproduct space are regular, and that the orthomodularposets constructed from the idempotents of a ring are regular. This result also establishes theregularity of the orthomodular posets that Mushtariconstructs from bounded modular lattices, theorthomodular posets one constructs from the subgroups ofa group, and the orthomodular posets oneconstructs from a normed group with operators. Moreover,all these orthomodular posets are regular for the samereason. The characterization of compatibility is also used to show that for any structure X, thefinite Boolean subalgebras of Fact X correspond tofinitary direct product decompositions of the structureX. For algebraic and relational structures X, this result is extended to show that the Booleansubalgebras of Fact X correspond to representations ofthe structure X as the global sections of a sheaf ofstructures over a Boolean space. The above results can be given a physical interpretation as well.Assume that the true or false questions \(Q\) of a quantum mechanical system correspond tobinary direct product decompositions of the state spaceof the system, as is the case with the usual von Neumanninterpretation of quantum mechanics. Suppose S is asubset of \(Q\). Then a necessary andsufficient condition that all questions in S can beanswered simultaneously is that any two questions in S can be answeredsimultaneously. Thus, regularity in quantum mechanicsfollows from the assumption that questions correspond todecompositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arens, R., and Kaplansky, I. (1949). Topological representations of algebras, Transactions of the AMS 63, 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, L. (1984). Orthomodular Lattices, Algebraic Approach, Academia, Prague/Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. (1967). Lattice Theory, 3rd ed., American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics, Annals of Mathematics, 37, 823–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabec, J. (1979). Compatibility in orthomodular posets, Casopis pro Pestovani Matematiky, 104, 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabec, J., and Pták, P. (1982). On compatibility in quantum logics, Foundations of Physics, 12, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, S., and Sankappanavar, H. P. (1981). A Course in Universal Algebra, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, L. H., and Tarski, A. (1951). Distributive and modular laws in relation algebras, University of California Publication in Mathematics New Series, 1, 341–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, S. D. (1971). Representations by algebras of sections over Boolean spaces, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 38, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B. A. (1973). Sheaf spaces and sheaves of universal algebras, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 134, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvurečenskij, A. (1993). Gleason's Theorem and Its Applications, Kluwer.

  • Flachsmeyer, J. (1982). A note on orthocomplemente d posets, in Proceedings Conference on Topology and Measure, Part III, Greifswald, pp. 65–75.

  • Harding, J. (1993). Completions of orthomodular lattices II, Order 10, 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (1996). Decompositions in quantum logic, Transactions of the AMS, 348(5), 1839–1862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson, B. (1982). Varieties of relation algebras, Algebra Universalis, 15, 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmbach, G. (1983). Orthomodular Lattices, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katrnoška, F. (1990). Logics of idempotents of rings, in Proceedings Winter School on Measure Theory II, Liptovský Ján, pp. 100–104.

  • Kelly, J. L. (1955). General Topology, Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, A. (1973). Model-completeness for sheaves of structures, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 81, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, G. W. (1963). The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushtari, D. Kh. (1989). Projection logics in Banach spaces, Soviet Mathematics-Iz. VUZ, 33, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubrunn, T., and Pulmannová, S. (1983). On compatibility in quantum logics, Acta Facultatis Universitatis Comenianae. Mathematica, 42–43, 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. S. (1967). Modules over commutative regular rings, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 70.

  • Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of Quantum Physics, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pták, P., and Pulmannová, S. (1991). Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics, Veda, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulmannová, S. (1981). Compatibility and partial compatibility in quantum logics, Foundations of Physics 11, 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, G. (1964). The Theory of Sheaves, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1941). On the calculus of binary relations, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. L. (1949). Modern Algebra, Ungar, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, V. S. (1985). Geometry of Quantum Theory, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechani k, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harding, J. Regularity in Quantum Logic. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37, 1173–1212 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026665818335

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026665818335

Keywords

Navigation