Demography, Clinical Characteristics, Psychological and Abuse Profiles, Treatment, and Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Gastroparesis
Patients with gastroparesis frequently presentchallenging clinical, diagnostic, and therapeuticproblems. Data from 146 gastroparesis patients seen oversix years were analyzed. Patients were evaluated at the time of initial diagnosis and at themost recent follow-up in terms of gastric emptying andgastrointestinal symptomatology. The psychologicalstatus and physical and sexual abuse history in female idiopathic gastroparesis patients wereascertained and an association between those factors andgastrointestinal symptomatology was sought. Eightytwopercent of patients were females (mean age: 45 years old). The mean age for onset of gastroparesiswas 33.7 years. The etiologies in 146 patients are: 36%idiopathic, 29% diabetic, 13% postgastric surgery, 7.5%Parkinson's disease, 4.8% collagen vascular disorders, 4.1% intestinal pseudoobstruction,and 6% miscellaneous causes. Subgroups were identifiedwithin the idiopathic group: 12 patients (23%) had apresentation consistent with a viral etiology, 48% had very prominent abdominal pain. Othersubgroups were gastroesophageal reflux disease andnonulcer dyspepsia (19%), depression (23%), and onset ofsymptoms immediately after cholecystectomy (8%).Sixty-two percent of women with idiopathic gastroparesisreported a history of physical or sexual abuse, andphysical abuse was significantly associated withabdominal pain, somatization, depression, and lifetime surgeries. At the end of the follow-up period,74% required continuous prokinetic therapy, 22% wereable to stop prokinetics, 5% had undergone gastrectomy,6.2% went onto gastric electrical stimulation (pacing), and 7% had died. At some point 21%had required nutrition support with a feedingjejunostomy tube or periods of parenteral nutrition. Agood response to pharmacological agents can be expected in the viral and dyspeptic subgroups ofidiopathics, Parkinson's disease, and the majority ofdiabetics, whereas a poorer outcome to prokinetics canbe expected in postgastrectomy patients, those withconnective tissue disease, a subgroup of diabetics, andthe subset of idiopathic gastroparesis dominated byabdominal pain and history of physical and sexual abuse.Appreciation of the different etiologies andpsychological status of the patients may help predictresponse to prokinetic therapy.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Malagelada J-R, Stanghelini V: Manometric evaluation of functional upper gut symptoms. Gastroenterology 88:1273- 1281, 1985Google Scholar
- 5.McCallum RW: Motor function of the stomach in health and disease. InGastrointestinal Disease—Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. MH Sleisinger and JS Fordtran (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co., 1989, pp 675-713Google Scholar
- 8.Butler RW, Satz P: Personality assessment of adults and children. InComprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry/VI. HI Kaplan, BJ Sadock (eds). Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1995, pp 544-562Google Scholar
- 9.Canadian National Survey, Committee on Sexual Offenses Against Children and Youth: Sexual Offenses Against Children. Ottawa, Canadian Government Publishing Centre, 1984Google Scholar
- 10.Derogatis LR: SCL-90-R Administration, Scoring and Procedures. Manual II for the revised version. Towson, Maryland, Clinical Psychometric Research, 1983Google Scholar
- 11.Weber FH, McCallum RW: Gastric motor disorders. InConsultations in Gastroenterology. WJ Snape (ed). WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1996, pp 247-259Google Scholar
- 22.Ibrarullah M, Mittal BR, Agarwal DK, Das BK, Kaushik SP: Gastric emptying in patients with gallstone disease with or without dyspepsia: Effect of cholecystectomy. Aust NZ J Surg 64:247-250, 1994Google Scholar
- 27.Silvers D, Kipnes M, Broadstone V, Patterson D, Quigley EM, McCallum R, Leidy NK, Farup C, Liu Y, Joslyn A, DOMUSA-5 Study Group: Domperidone in the management of symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis: Efficacy, tolerability, and quality-of-life outcomes in a multicenter controlled trial. Clin Ther 20(3):438-453, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar