Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Subacute Versus Chronic Status of Low Back Pain Patients' Response to a Functional Restoration Program

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated various functional capacity measures in two cohorts of patients participating in a functional restoration program: 1) subacute patients (defined as being admitted to the program within 1/2 year of injury), and 2) chronic patients (defined as being admitted after 1/2 year of injury). The main aim was to evaluate the differential effects of subacute versus chronic intervention functional outcomes of low back pain patients who participated in a functional restoration program. Findings clearly demonstrated that, compared to the chronic intervention group (n = 170), the subacute intervention group (n = 110) displayed greater functional performance gains in various tasks (e.g., range of motion, lifting capacity, etc.). These findings are consistent with recent suggestions in the literature that early intervention will produce greater therapeutic improvement in low back pain patients, with resultant health-care cost savings. Additional research is needed to further evaluate the utility of distinguishing among acute, subacute, and chronic patients as a means of predicting the degree of functional gains produced by intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mayer TG, et al. A prospective randomized two year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury utilizing objective assessment. J Am Med Assoc 1987; 258: 1763–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer TG, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine 1985; 10: 482–493.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bendix AE, et al. Multidisciplinary intensive treatment for chronic low back pain: A randomized, prospective study. Cleveland Clin J Med 1996; 63: 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hazard RG, et al. Functional restoration with behavioral support: A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 1989; 14: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Linton SJ, Bradley LA. Strategies for the prevention of chronic pain. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, eds. Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford Publications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Linton SJ, Bradley LA. An 18-month follow-up of a secondary prevention program for back pain: Help and hindrance factors related to outcome maintenance. Clin J Pain 1992; 8: 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell RI, Carmen GM. Results of a multicenter trial using an intensive active exercise program for the treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries. Spine 1990; 15: 514–521.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jordan KD, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Should disability chronicity be an exclusion criterion for tertiary rehabilitation? Socioeconomic outcomes of early vs. late functional restoration in compensation spinal disorders. Spine 1998; 23: 2110–2116.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bigos SJ, et al. Acute low back problems in adults: Assessment and treatment. Quick reference to guide clinicians. No. 14, Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Committee A.A.T.N.H., New Zealand acute low back guide. Wellington, New Zealand, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer TG, et al. Contemporary concepts in spine care rehabilitation: Secondary and tertiary nonoperative care. Spine 1995; 20: 2060–2066.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keeley J, et al. Quantification of lumbar function, Part V: Reliability of range of motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine 1986; 11: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer TG, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation: An erratum. Spine 1990; 15: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer TG, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. Part I. A standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 1988; 13: 993–997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fishbain DA, et al. Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the dictionary of occupational titles. Spine 1994; 19: 872–880.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ebbeling C, et al. Development of a single-stage submaximal treadmill walking test. Med & Sci Sports & Exerc 1991; 23(8): 966–973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. West Coast Spine Restoration Center, Riverside, California

    C. Scott Woods & Nancy D. Kishino

  2. Haider Spine Center, Riverside, California

    Thomas T. Haider & Phillip K. Kay

Authors
  1. C. Scott Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nancy D. Kishino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas T. Haider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Phillip K. Kay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woods, C.S., Kishino, N.D., Haider, T.T. et al. Effects of Subacute Versus Chronic Status of Low Back Pain Patients' Response to a Functional Restoration Program. J Occup Rehabil 10, 229–233 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026618519877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026618519877

Search

Navigation