Abstract
Physicists share a general consensus on theformal treatment of time within their theories, whichdoes not preclude, however, the possibility ofdifferences in understanding and interpretation, asshown on several examples, taken mainly from theso-called 'special' and'general' theories of relativity. Thehistorical roots of the pitiful neglect of thisconceptual variability are sketched. We are finally led to wonder about the possibility ofalternative theorizations of time in physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, Aux contraires (Gallimard, 1996), Chapter IV, pp. 117-144.
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, Galilei group and Galilean invariance, in Group Theory and Applications, E. Loebl, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1971).
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, Nonrelativistic particles and wave equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 6, 286 (1967); Enigmas of the Sp(h)in(x), in Foundations of Quantum Theory, P. Mittelstaedt and P. Lahti, eds. (1993); see also Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond and Françoise Balibar, Quantics, Vol. 1, Rudiments (North-Holland, 199 0), Chapter 3.
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, On the conceptual nature of the physical constants, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 7, 187 (1977).
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, Did the big bang begin? Am. J. Phys. 58, 156 (1990); The unbegun big bang, Nature 342, 6177 (1988).
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, La pierre de touche (Gallimard, 1996), pp. 93-116.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levy-Leblond, JM. About Time. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38, 3039–3047 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026616401227
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026616401227