Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reading's Impact on Democratic Citizenship in America

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polls conducted for the Times Mirror/Pew Research Center for The People & The Press enable us to explore reading's impact on democratic citizenship in the United States. After exploring literacy's meaning and significance, we assess how much Americans read and how reading affects key facets of democratic citizenship: attention to, knowledge of, and participation in public affairs and tolerance for unpopular groups. A measure of time spent reading the day before being interviewed is a significant predictor of democratic citizenship, even when other key factors' effects are taken into account. Reading remains essential to the quality of citizenship in modern democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adoni, Hanna (1995). Literacy and reading in a multimedia environment. Journal of Communication 45(2): 152–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, Duane F. (1991). Family of origin and cohort differences in verbal ability. American Sociological Review 56: 625–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batstone, David, and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds.) (1999). The Good Citizen. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, G. Kylene (1996a). No time, no interest, no way: the 3 voices ofaliteracy, part I. School Library Journal 42(2): 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, G. Kylene (1996b). No time, no interest, no way: the 3 voices ofaliteracy, part II. School Library Journal 42(3): 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen E. (1986). Apathy in America, 1960–1984. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen E. (1995). Americans’ knowledge ofideology, 1980–1994. American Politics Quarterly 23: 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard [1949] (1954). What “missing the newspaper” means. In iDaniel Katz, Dorwin Cartwright, Samuel Eldersveld, and Alfred McClung Lee (eds.), Public Opinion and Propaganda, pp. 263–270. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkerts, Sven (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, Leo (1989). Press and Public: Who Reads What, When, Where, and Why in American Newspapers, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botstein, Leon (1990). Damaged literacy: illiterates and American democracy. Daedalus119(2): 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, John (1993). The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation.Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Richard D. (1989). Knowledge is Power: The Diffusion of Information in Early America, 1700–1865. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Richard D. (1996). The Strength of a People: The Idea of an Informed Citizenry in America, 1650–1870. Chapel Hill: University ofNorth Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Jerome (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, Hadley D., with Strunk, Mildred (eds.) (1951). Public Opinion, 1935–1946.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Richard G., and Zeller, Edward A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment(Sage Professional Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–017). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob, and Cohen, Patricia (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In Angus Campbell and Philip E. Converse (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change, pp. 263–337. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1990). Popular representation and the distribution ofinf ormation.In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes, pp. 369–388. Urbana: University ofIllinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (2000). Assessing the capacity ofmass electorates. In Nelson W. Polsby (ed.), Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 3, pp. 331–353. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Stephen C., and Bennett, Stephen Earl (eds.) (1997). After the Boom: The Politics of Generation X. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • De Castell, Suzanne, and Luke, Allan [1983] (1988). Defining “literacy” in North American schools: Social and historical conditions and consequences. In Eugene R. Kintgen, Barry M. Kroll, and Mike Rose (eds.), Perspectives on Literacy, pp. 159–174. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, Robert F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, George H. (1989). Principal components analysis. (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–069). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll Monthly (1991). Signs encouraging for an upsurge in reading in America. The GallupPoll Monthly, 305: 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, William J. (1989). Reading Becomes a Necessity of Life: Material and Cultural Life in Rural New England, 1780–1855. Knoxville: University ofTennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, Norval D. (1994). Television watching, newspaper reading, and cohort differences in verbal ability. Sociology of Education 67: 216–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, Jack, and Watt, Ian [1963] (1988). The consequences ofliteracy. In Eugene R. Kintgen, Barry M. Kroll, and Mike Rose (eds.), Perspectives on Literacy, pp. 3–27. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication 40(3): 134–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris A. (1996). Wrong questions, wrong answers: measuring political knowledge. Presented at the annual meeting ofthe Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, Harvey J. (1995). The Labyrinths of Literacy: Reflections on Literacy Past and Present. Revised and expanded ed. Pittsburgh: University ofPittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E. (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, William V. (1989). Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Roderick. (2000). Campaign Talk: Why Elections Are Good for Us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Kevin A., and Hughes, John E. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, C. Richard, Sticht, Thomas G., and Hofstetter, Carolyn Huie (1999). Knowledge, literacy, and power. Communication Research 26(1): 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart, Richard (1961). The Uses of Literacy: Changing Patterns in English Mass Culture. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, Barry A. (1994). Patterns in the exposure and influence of the old news and the new news. Mass Comm Review 21(3 & 4): 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, Barry A. (1996). Talk radio: predictors of use and effects on attitudes about government. Journalism and Communication Quarterly 73: 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, Herbert H., Wright, Charles R., and Reed, John Sheldon (1975). The Enduring Effects of Education. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestle, Carl F. (1991a). Studying the history ofliteracy. In Carl F. Kaestle, Helen Damon-Moore, Lawrence C. Stedman, Katherine Tinsley, and William Vance Trollinger, Jr. (eds.), Literacy in the United States: Readers and Reading since 1880, pp. 3–32. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestle, Carl F. (1991b). The history ofreaders. In Carl F. Kaestle, Helen Damon-Moore, Lawrence C. Stedman, Katherine Tinsley, and William Vance Trollinger, Jr. (eds.), Literacy in the United States: Readers and Reading since 1880, pp. 33–72. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm ofpolitics. In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 778–867. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary (1986). How not to lie with statistics: avoiding common mistakes in quantitative political science. American Journal of Political Science 30: 666–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, Jonathan (1985). Illiterate America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert E. (1965). Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics,revised ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Kendall, Patricia L. (1948). Radio Listening in America. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Merton, Robert K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. In Lymon Bryson (ed.), The Communication of Ideas,pp. 95–118. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Thomas C. (1986). The Power of the Press: The Birth of American Political Reporting. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Thomas C. (1995). News for All: America's Coming-of-Age with the Press.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Daniel [1958] (1964). The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockridge, Kenneth A. (1974). Literacy in Colonial New England: An Enquiry into the Social Context of Literacy in the Early Modern West. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, Robert C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior 12: 331–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra L. (1995). With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGerr, Michael E. (1986). The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North 1865–1928. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man.Toronto: University ofToronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., Miller, Arthur H., and Schneider, Edward J. (1980). American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1995). Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. Russell (1991). The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. Russell, Just, Marion R., and Crigler, Ann N. (1992). Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Meaning. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Junn, Jane, and Stehlik-Barry, Kenneth (1996). Education and Democratic Citizenshipin America. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, David R. (1994). The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Steven A. (1990). Political Behavior: Patterns in Everyday Life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center (1996, May 13). TV news viewership declines: fall off greater among young adults and computer users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for The People & The Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center (1998, June 8). Internet takes off: event-driven news audiences. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for The People & The Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center (1999, November). Retro-Politics. The Political Typology: Version 3.0.Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for The People & The Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center (2000, June 11). Internet sapping broadcast news audience: investors go online for quotes, advice. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for The People & The Press. Available at http://www.peoplepress.org/media00rpt.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, Austin (1990). Broadcasting, narrowcasting, and politics. In Anthony King (ed.), The New American Political System, 2nd version, pp. 175–201. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhine, Staci L., Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Flickinger, Richard S. (1998). Americans’ exposure and attention to public affairs in the mass media: What they listen to, read, watch, and care about. Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association's Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, April 23–26.

  • Robinson, John P., Barth, Kevin, and Kohut, Andrew (1997). Personal computers, mass media, and use oftime. Social Science Computer Review 15: 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John P., and Godbey, Geoffrey (1999). Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time, 2nd ed. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  • Robinson, John P., and Levy, Mark R. (1986). The Main Source: Learning from Television News. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael (1978). Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael (1998). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, Deborah (1989). American reading habits (and education) on the rise. Library Journal 114(9): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, Garrett Ward (1991). The Political Philosophy of Thomas Jefferson. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Stratford P. (1991). America won't win till it reads more. Fortune, November 18, 1991: 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward (1966). Political Development in the New States. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltow, Lee, and Stevens, Edward (1981). The Rise of Literacy and the Common School in the United States: A Socioeconomic Analysis to 1870. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Harold W., and Niemi, Richard G. (1998). Vital Statistics on American Politics, 1997–1998. Washington, DC: C.Q. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, Samuel A. (1955). Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E. (1982). Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimmesch, Nick (ed.) (1984). Aliteracy: People Who Can Read ButWon't. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis F. (1970). The Democratic Citizen: Social Science and Democratic Theory in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Mirror(1990, July 15). The American Media: Who Reads, Who Watches, Who Listens, Who Cares. Washington, DC: Times Mirror Center for The People & The Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Mirror(1994, May). Technology in the American Household: The Role of Technology in American Life. Washington, DC: Times Mirror Center for The People & The Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Mirror(1995, October 16). Technology in the American Household: Americans Going Online... Explosive Growth, Uncertain Destinations. Washington, DC: Times Mirror Center for The People & The Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (1998). Human Development Report 1998. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples, Douglas, Berelson, Bernard, and Bradshaw, Franklyn R. (1940). What Reading Does to People. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Michael (1990). The Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, Richard A., and Carmines, Edward G. (1980). Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link between Theory and Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, 161 Chipmunk Lane, Blowing Rock, North Carolina, 28605

    Stephen Earl Bennett

  2. Department of Political Science, Wittenberg University, USA

    Staci L. Rhine & Richard S. Flickinger

Authors
  1. Stephen Earl Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Staci L. Rhine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard S. Flickinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, S.E., Rhine, S.L. & Flickinger, R.S. Reading's Impact on Democratic Citizenship in America. Political Behavior 22, 167–195 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026616029255

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026616029255

Search

Navigation