Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Employers' Disability Management Activities: Descriptors and an Exploratory Test of the Financial Incentives Hypothesis

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes and analyzes results from a survey of disability management activities of 273 employers. Respondents were primarily medium and large firms from all regions of the country and a variety of industries. Results indicated that two disability management strategies recently endorsed in the literature, frontline manager involvement and contracting with outside vendors to integrate disability management responsibilities, were implemented only by a minority of respondents. Statistical analyses were used to test the hypothesis that financial incentives, and (specifically) employers' perceived exposure to disability and other fringe benefit costs, would predict implementation of disability management efforts. Almost all statistically significant findings supported this general hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owens P. The full cost of disability: Results, trends and assessment. Broker World 1997; March: 46, 48, 124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kazel R. Integrated disability called a cost saver. Bus Ins 1998; 32(18): 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shrey DE, Hursh NC. Workplace disability management: International trends and perspectives. J Occup Rehab 1999; 9(1): 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lipoff E, Kirchner K, Orrick S. Introduction. In: The annual review of disability management. Washington, DC: Washington Business Group on Health/Institute for Rehabilitation and Disability Management, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galvin D. The disability management research review. Washington, DC: Washington Business Group on Health/Institute for Rehabilitation and Disability Management, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McMahon C. Disability management triumphs. Ben Canada 1999; 23(4): 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Budkiewicz DF. Integrated approach is key to disability management. Nat Underwriter Prop Cas 1999; 103(10): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saroki FJ, Welch EM. Return to work–proof that it works. On Workers' Comp 1997; April: 9–10.

  9. Schwartz GE, Watson SD, Galvin DE, Lipoff E. The disability management sourcebook. Washington, DC: Washington Business Group on Health/Institute for Rehabilitation and Disability Management, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer RA, Graham ES. Simplifying the return-to-work maze. Risk Manag 1995; 42: 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fenelle C. New trends and approaches: Keeping track of disability management. Risk Manag 1997; 44: 76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duff S. PepsiCo awash in integration savings. Emp Ben News 1999; 13(6): 1, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Watson Wyatt. Staying @ work: Increasing shareholder value through integrated disability management, Third Annual Survey Report. Bethesda, MD: Watson Wyatt Worldwide, 1998/99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employee benefits in medium and large private establishments, 1995. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, 1998; Bulletin 2496: Table 26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chelius JR. Role of workers' compensation in developing safer workplaces. Monthly Labor Rev 1991; September: 22–25.

  16. Victor RB, Fleischman CA. How choice of provider and recessions affect medical costs in workers' compensation. Cambridge, MA: Workers' Compensation Research Institute, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller RH, Luft HS. Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care? Health Affairs 1997; 16(5): 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caldwell B. ADA creates conflicts with laws, union contracts. Emp Ben Plan Rev 1995; 49: 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akabas SH. Disability management: a longstanding trade union mission with some new initiatives. J Appl Rehab Couns 1986; 17(3): 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jovanovic B. Firm-specific capital and turnover. J Pol Econ 1979; 87(6): 1246–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kerns WL. Cash benefits for short-term sickness, 1970-1994. Soc Sec Bull 1997; 60(1): 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ceniceros R. Disability integration makes slow gains, study shows. Bus Ins 1998; 16:32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cutting jobs? Watch your disability expenses grow. Manag Rev 1997; 86: 9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salkever, D.S., Shinogle, J. & Purushothaman, M. Employers' Disability Management Activities: Descriptors and an Exploratory Test of the Financial Incentives Hypothesis. J Occup Rehabil 10, 199–214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026614418969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026614418969

Navigation