Skip to main content
Log in

Large Group Intervention to Encourage Dialogue Between Directors and Workers in the Context of Organizational Ambiguity

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

In the postmodern era the entire sphere of employment is undergoing changes that create feelings of ambiguity. These changes are reflected in the use of defense mechanisms such as splits between management and employees, and alienation and dissociation. Occupational social workers are also experiencing insecurity. Although their function is to assist individuals and the organization during crises, they are not able to detach themselves from their experiences. It is more difficult for them resort to bridging and dialogue in order to ameliorate feelings of anxiety. This article will describe how a large group intervention can provide practical experience that raises self-awareness and facilitates coping with organizational ambiguity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Agazarian, Y., M., & Carter, F. B. (1993). Discussion on the large group, Group, 17(4), 210–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzieu, D. (1984). The group and the unconscious. International library of group psychotherapy and group process: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargal, D. (1984). Social work in the world of work. Monograph series, Israeli Council of Social Work and Akadamon (Hebrew).

  • Bargal D., Back, A., & Ariav, P. (1992). Occupational social work and prolonged job insecurity in a declining organization. Administration in Social Work, Vol. 16(1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargal. D., & Katan, J. (1998). Social Work in the world of work: The Israeli case, In F. M. Loewenberg (Ed.), Social Work. Israel: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1961). Experience in Groups. London: Tavistock

    Google Scholar 

  • Briar, K. (1988). Social Work and The Unemployed. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoff on survivors: Research, theory and practice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, B. B. & Alban B. T. (1998). Large group intervention engaging the whole system for rapid change. New York: Warner Burke, Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (1993). Some consequences of conceiving society as a large group. Group, 17(4), 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., E. (1967). Large therapeutic group critique and appraisal of selected literature. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy (17), 536.

  • De Maré, P. (1982). Large group perspective. In M. Pines and L. Rafaelsen (Eds.), The individual and the group boundaries interrelation. N.Y: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maré P., Piper R., & Thompson, S. (1991). Koinonia: From hate, through dialogue to culture in the large group. London: Karnac books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster B., & Schore, L. (1990). Job loss and occupational social work. In Ashenberg, Stranssner, Shulamit, & Lala (Eds.), Occupational social work today, (pp. 77-95). Haworth Press.

  • Foulkes, S.H. (1975). Problems of the large group from a group analytic point of view. In L. Kreeger (Ed.), The large group dynamics and therapy. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstone, J., & Raynolds, T. (1997). Single session group work intervention in response to employee stress during workplace transformation. Social Work With Groups, 20(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (1996). The Social Unconscious in Clinical Work. Mikbatz 2(2), 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawel Y., & Gechtman V. (1995). Invite for a dream: The future anatomy that exists today here and now. Human Resources, 8-22.

  • Kernberg, O. F. (1993). Paranoiagenesis in organizations. In Kaplan, H.I. & Sadock, B.J. (Eds.), Comprehensive group psychotherapy (3rd ed., pp. 45–57). Baltimore: Williams and Willkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klien, E. B. (1993). Large groups in treatment and training settings. Group, 17(4), 198–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, W. (1996). Bold new world: The essential map to the twenty first century. Harvard Capital group.

  • Kreeger, L. (1975). The large group: Dynamics and therapy. Illinos: Peacock Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, P.A., & Akabas, S.H. (1993). Work and well being: The occupational social work advance. National Association of Social Workers, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawence, G.W. (1993). Signals of transcendence in large groups as a system. Group, 17(4), 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. W., Bain, A. & Gould, L. (1996). The fifth basic assumption. Free Associations, 6(1), No. 37, 28–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (1997). Occupational social work practice. In Reisch M. and Gambrill E. (Eds.), Social work in the 21st century. Pine Porge Press.

  • Main, T. (1975). Some psychodynamics of large groups. In L. Kreeger (Ed.), The large group dynamics and therapy. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, S., & Glassman, S. (1969). Large and small group therapy in a state mental health center. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 19 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turquet, P. M. (1974). Leadership: The individual and the group. In Gibbard, G.S. et al. (Eds.). The large group: Therapy and dynamics. San Francisco and London: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, L.S. (1997). Social work and the workplace. In Reisch M. & Gambrill E. (Eds.), Social work in the 21st century. Pine Porge Press.

  • Wax, J. (1965). Analyzing a therapeutic community meeting. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 15(1).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuttman-Shwartz, O., Shay, S. Large Group Intervention to Encourage Dialogue Between Directors and Workers in the Context of Organizational Ambiguity. Group 24, 279–288 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026612525872

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026612525872

Navigation