Skip to main content
Log in

The distribution of a generalized diversity index due to Good

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good (1953, 1982) proposed a generalized diversity index which includes as special cases both Shannon's and Simpson's indices. This index can be further generalized as described in Baczkowski et al. (1997, 1998). In this paper the first four moments of this generalized index are derived for both a general species abundance distribution and the case with all species abundances equal, the equiprobable case. This allows the skewness and kurtosis of the index to be determined and thus gives information about the distribution of the index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baczkowski, A.J. (1996) Moments of a generalized diversity index due to Good. Unpublished Internal Report STAT 96/18, December 1996. Department of Statistics, University of Leeds.

  • Baczkowski, A.J. (1998) Applications of Good's generalized diversity index. Unpublished Internal Report STAT 98/11, September 1998, Department of Statistics, University of Leeds.

  • Baczkowski, A.J., Joanes, D.N., and Shamia, G. (1997) Properties of a generalized diversity index. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 188, 207-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baczkowski, A.J., Joanes, D.N., and Shamia, G.M. (1998) Range of validity of αand βfor a generalized diversity index H(α, β) due to Good. Mathematical Biosciences, 148, 115-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basharin, G.P. (1959) On a statistical estimate for the entropy of a sequence of independent random variables. In Theory of Probability and its Applications, Volume IV, (Translation of Teoriya Veroyatnosteii ee Pvimeneniya), N. Artin (ed), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 333-6.

  • Berger, W.H. and Parker, F.L. (1970) Diversity of planktonic forminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168, 1345-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, T.N. and Uppuluri, V.R.R. (1976) Population disagreement and Gini's index of diversity. General Systems, 21, 101-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, K.O., Hutcheson, K., Odum, E.P., and Shenton, L.R. (1971) Comments on the distribution of indices of diversity. International Symposium of Statistical Ecology, 3, 315-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A.C. and Whitford, H.J. (1986) How to use the two sample t-test. Biometrical Journal, 28, 131-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. (1982) Comment on the paper by G.P. Patil and C. Taillie. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 561-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S.H. (1956) The measurement of linguistic diversity. Language, 32, 109-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heip, C. and Engels, P. (1974) Comparing species diversity and evenness indices. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 54, 559-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54, 427-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanes, D.N. and Gill, C.A. (1992) Interval estimation of a measure of diversity. Journal of Applied Statistics, 19, 323-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanes, D.N. and Gill, C.A. (1998) Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. The Statistician, 47, 183-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanes, D.N., Gill, C.A., and Baczkowski, A.J. (1994) Simulation of a Bayesian interval estimate for a heterogeneity measure. In COMPSTAT 1994, Proceedings in Computational Statistics, R. Dutter and W. Grossman (eds), Physica-Verlag, 187-92.

  • Kendall, M. and Stuart, A. (1977) The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume I, (4th edition), Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, J. and Strayer, D. (1988) Patterns of the abundance of species: a comparison of two hierarchical models. Oikos, 53, 235-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N.I. and Hutcheson, K. (1979) Distributional properties of Simpson's index of diversity. Communications in Statistics — Theory and Methodology, A8, 569-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. (1957) On the relative abundance of bird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 43, 293-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E.S. and Hartley, H.O. (1954) Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E.S. and Merrington, M. (1951) Tables of the 5% and 0.5% point of Pearson curves (with argument β 1and β 2) expressed in standard measure. Biometrika, 38, 4-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E.C. (1975) Ecological Diversity, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E.C. (1977) Mathematical Ecology, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E.H. (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara, G. (1980) Minimal community structure: an explanation of species abundance patterns. The American Naturalist, 116, 770-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R.R. (1990) Comparing the means of two independent groups. Biometrical Journal, 32, 771-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.B. (1964) Pattern in the Balance of Nature, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baczkowski, A., Joanes, D. & Shamia, G. The distribution of a generalized diversity index due to Good. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 7, 329–342 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026567414861

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026567414861

Navigation