What university teachers teach and how they teach it
In this article we make three related arguments. The first isthat different teachers have different intentions concerning whatstudents will learn and consequently in their teaching they constitutethe topic or subject to be taught quite differently. The second is thata teacher's intentions concerning what it is that students should learnis closely aligned with a teacher's expectation of how students learnand how they can be helped to learn through teaching. The third is thatwhen teachers focus specifically on the teaching of a particular topic,within a specific context, there is a close relationship between theirintentions and their teaching practice. In this article we explore thesearguments through an empirical study which considers the different waysin which 26 university teachers intended to constitute a subject ortopic for their students to study, how they then taught the subject andsubsequently how consistent were their intentions and their practice.The analysis shows that when the context of teaching and learning istightly defined there is a clear relationship between a teacher'sintention and their practice. In particular, university teachers whoadopt more conceptual change and student-focussed approaches to teachingconstitute objects of study which are more relational and focus on thestudent's knowledge. Approaches which are more information transmissionand teacher-focussed constitute objects of study which are moremulti-structural and have a focus on knowledge which is as constitutedas being external to the student.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Biggs, J.B. & Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, H. & Habeshaw (1986). 53 Interesting Ways to Assess Your Students. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.Google Scholar
- Martin, E. & Balla, M. (1991). Conceptions of teaching and implications for learning. Research and Development in Higher Education 13: 298–304.Google Scholar
- Martin, E. & Ramsden, P (1998). Approaches to teaching creative writing. In B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis, eds, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
- Marton, F. and Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Patrick, K. (1992). Teachers and curriculum at year 12: Constructing an object of study. Paper presented at the joint conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria.Google Scholar
- Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction 4: 217–231.Google Scholar
- Prosser M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education 27: 75–84.Google Scholar
- Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to Learning. Higher Education 37: 57–70.Google Scholar