Skip to main content
Log in

Low level of selfing found in a sample of crosses in Australian sugarcane breeding programs

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In sugarcane breeding programs, parents used in crosses are classified as male or female based on relative amounts of viable pollen produced. Usually the ‘female’ parent produces some pollen, albeit at a lower level than the ‘male’ parent. The possibility of selfing and associated problems have long been recognised by breeders. A high level of selfing may seriously bias estimates of breeding value of parents and affect the reliability of family means for identifying superior crosses. However, there is no reliable information reported indicating the level to which selfing is occurring in sugarcane crosses. The level of selfing was evaluated in eight Australian sugarcane crosses using RAPD markers. The crosses were selected as exhibiting variable levels of performance, as judged by measurements of commercial cane sugar (CCS), cane yield (TCH) and sugar yield (TSH) in plots consisting of random progeny clones. Five to eight male-specific RAPD bands were identified for each cross and used to screen twenty-eight to thirty-eight progeny from each cross. Selfed progeny were identified in each cross on the basis of absence of any male-specific RAPD bands after screening with at least 5 such RAPDs. Levels of selfing ranged from 0 to17.6%, with most of the crosses exhibiting zero or low levels of selfing. Although only a limited number of sugarcane crosses have been studied, this survey suggests that unwanted selfing is not a significant problem in the Australian sugarcane breeding program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cassalett, C., C.A. Viveros & L.R. Pizza, 1996. Self pollination in sugarcane hybrids, Saccharum sp. Proc Int Soc Sugarcane Technol 22: 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divinagracia, N.S., 1980. Emasculation of sugarcane flowers: Steam method. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 17: 1287–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D.J. & T.L. Tew, 1987. Hybridization Procedures. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed.), Sugarcane Improvement Through Breeding, pp. 313–342. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, D.M., 1980. The effect of accidental selfing on the analysis of a diallel cross with sugar cane. Euphytica 29: 737–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, J.R., D.I. Walker, J.A. Bressiani & J.A. Goncalves da Silva, 1996. Emasculation of sugarcane tassels using hot water. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 22: 346–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof, M.A., K.M. Soliman, R.A. Jorgensen & R.W. Allard, 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Nat Acad Sciences USA 81: 8014–8018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, J.C., 1959. Controlled pollination of sugar cane. Bur Sugar Exp Stn (QLD) Tech Com 1, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, G.C., 1965. Genetics and Breeding of Sugarcane. Longmans, London, 284 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y., J.M. Manners, M.M. Ludlow & R.G. Henzell, 1993. DNA polymorphisms in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Theor Appl Genet 86: 679–688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, C., Jackson, P. Low level of selfing found in a sample of crosses in Australian sugarcane breeding programs. Euphytica 117, 245–249 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026527617892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026527617892

Navigation