Skip to main content
Log in

Institutional Researchers' Perceptions of Effectiveness

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the results of a research study that investigated institutional researchers' perceptions regarding their effectiveness in influencing policy changes at their institution. Data were obtained from a mailed survey sent to 304 researchers in the Northeast; a response rate of 73 percent was achieved. Results revealed that those whose work is used in executive decision making, who include policy recommendations in reports, conduct follow-up studies on the impact of their work, have a doctorate, are part of a strong, professional network, and describe their positions as challenging perceive themselves as more effective. The discriminant function including these variables explained 48 percent of the variance and accurately predicted the perceived policy effectiveness for 84 percent of the participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bagshaw, M. (Winter 1999). Teaching institutional research to the learning-inhibited institution. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 73-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, A. M. (1997). The role of institutional research in higher education: enabling researchers to meet new challenges. Research in Higher Education 38(1): 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (Spring 1995). Managing in tomorrow's academic environment. New Directions for Institutional Research (85): 59-64.

  • Knight, W. E., Moore, M. E., and Coperthwaite, C. A. (1997). Institutional research: knowledge, skills, and perceptions of effectiveness. Research in Higher Education 38(4): 419-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, S. B. (Winter 1999). A profile of institutional researchers from AIR national membership surveys. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 41-50.

  • Lohmann, D. (May 1998). Positioning institutional research as a major player in policy decisions: problems to solve, actions to take. Paper presented at the 38th annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

  • Matier, M. W., Sidle, C. C., and Hurst, P. J. (1994, May). How it ought to be: Institutional researchers' roles as we approach the 21st century. Paper presented at the 34th annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Muffo, J. A. (Winter 1999). A comparison of findings from regional studies of institutional research offices. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 51-59.

  • Peterson, M. W. (Winter 1999). The role of institutional research: from improvement to redesign. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 83-103.

  • Sanford, T. R. (Spring 1995). Higher education and institutional research: what lies ahead. New Directions for Institutional Research (85): 85-87.

  • Schmidtlein, F. A. (Winter 1999). Emerging perspectives on organizational behavior: implications for institutional researchers. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 61-71.

  • Terenzini, P. T. (Winter 1999). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 21-29.

  • Volkwein, J. F. (Winter 1999). The four faces of institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research (104): 9-19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delaney, A.M. Institutional Researchers' Perceptions of Effectiveness. Research in Higher Education 42, 197–210 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026525620109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026525620109

Navigation