Skip to main content
Log in

Scale Economies in Credit Unions: Accounting for Subsidies Is Important

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1998, the Credit Union Services Corporation Australia Limited (CUSCAL) recommended that Australian credit unions with assets below $5 million should consider merging with larger credit unions. This industry position is at odds with empirical studies, which find little evidence of increasing returns to scale in credit unions. However, an important bias in previous studies of scale economies in credit unions has been the omission of credit union subsidies. This paper shows that the failure to account for subsidies biases the results toward finding diseconomies of scale. After correcting for the subsidy bias, there is very strong evidence of increasing returns to scale in a sample of New South Wales credit unions, supporting the industry recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baur, P.W., A.N. Berger, G.D. Ferrier, and D.B. Humphrey. “Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods.” Journal of Economics and Business 50 (1998), 85-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. “Distribution-Free Estimates of Efficiency in the U.S. Banking Industry and Tests of the Standard Distributional Assumptions.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 4 (1993), 261-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey. “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In: Z. Griliches, E.R. Berndt, T.F. Bresnahan, and M.E. Manser, eds, Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 245-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey. “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research.” European Journal of Operational Research 98, no. 2 (1997), 175-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. and L.J. Mester. “Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions?” Journal of Banking and Finance 21 (1997), 895-947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and I. O'Connor. “Measurement of Economies of Scale in Victorian Credit Unions.” Australian Journal of Management 20, no. 1 (1995), 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crapp, H.R. “Scale Economies in the NSW Credit Union Industry.” Australian Journal of Management 1, (1983), 33-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Credit Union Services Corporation (Australia) Limited. “Review of Movement Performance and Future Structure.” Issues paper, CUSCAL, 1998a.

  • Credit Union Services Corporation (Australia) Limited. Review of Movement Performance and Future Structure. Interim report, CUSCAL, 1998b.

  • Esho, N. “The Determinants of Efficiency in New South Wales Credit Unions.” Ph.D. thesis, The University of New South Wales, 1998a.

  • Esho, N. “The Determinants of Cost Efficiency in New South Wales Credit Unions: 1985-1993.” The University of New South Wales, School of Banking and Finance, Working Paper Series 1998-05 1998b.

  • Esho, N. and I.G. Sharpe. “Long-Run Estimates of Technological Change and Scale Economies in a Dynamic Framework: Australian Permanent Building Societies, 1974-1990.” Journal of Banking and Finance 19 (1995), 1135-1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixler, D.J. and K.D. Zieschang. “User Costs, Shadow Prices and the Real Output of Banks.” In: Z. Griliches, ed., Output Measurement in the Services Sector. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 219-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M.J. “An Economic Evaluation of Credit Unions in the United States.” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Research Report no. 54 (1974).

  • Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell, and P.V. Eeckaut. “Evaluating the Performance of U.S. Credit Unions.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, (1993), 251-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, P. “Multiproduct Cost Attributes: A Study of U.K. Building Societies.” Oxford Economics Papers 2 (1990), 446-461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.P., W. Lang, L.J. Mester, and C.-G. Moon. “Efficient Banking Under Interstate Branching.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28 (1996), 1045-1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivaldi, M., N. Ladoux, H. Ossard, and M. Simioni. “Comparing Fourier and Translog Specifications of Multiproduct Technology: Evidence from an Incomplete Panel of French Farmers.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (1996), 649-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.H. “Economies of Scale and Economies of Scope in Multiproduct Financial Institutions: Further Evidence from Credit Unions.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 18, no. 2 (1986), 220-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koot, R.S. “On Economies of Scale in Credit Unions.” The Journal of Finance 33, no. 4 (1978), 1087-1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, G. and P. Welzel. “Efficiency and Technical Progress in Banking. Empirical Results for a Panel of German Cooperative Banks.” Journal of Banking and Finance 20 (1996), 1003-1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, P.H. and D. McManus. “Resolving the Scale Efficiency Puzzle in Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17 (1993), 389-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. and N.M. Onvural. “Economies of Scale and Scope at Large Commercial Banks: Evidence from the Fourier Flexible Functional Form.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, no. 2 (1996), 178-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J.D. and R.B. White. “Economies of Scale and Deposit-Taking Financial Institutions in Canada, A Study of British Columbia Credit Unions.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 12, no. 1 (1980), 58-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J.D. and R.B. White. “Economies of Scale and Economies of Scope in Multiproduct Financial Institutions, Study of British Columbia Credit Unions.” The Journal of Finance 281, no. 3 (1983), 887-902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R.D. “Estimating Functional Forms with Special Reference to Agriculture: Discussion.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984), 223-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, S. “A Revenue-Restricted Cost Study of 100 Large Banks.” Applied Financial Economics 4 (1994), 193-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, S. “Translog Bias Under Declining Average Costs.” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper No. 95-13, May 1995.

  • Westley, G.D. and S. Shaffer. “Credit Union Policies and Performance in Latin America.” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, no. 9 (1999), 1303-1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolken, J.D. and F.J. Navratil. “Economies of Scale in Credit Unions: Further Evidence.” The Journal of Finance 25, no. 3 (1980), 769-775.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esho, N. Scale Economies in Credit Unions: Accounting for Subsidies Is Important. Journal of Financial Services Research 18, 29–43 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026523506546

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026523506546

Navigation