Abstract
In 1998, the Credit Union Services Corporation Australia Limited (CUSCAL) recommended that Australian credit unions with assets below $5 million should consider merging with larger credit unions. This industry position is at odds with empirical studies, which find little evidence of increasing returns to scale in credit unions. However, an important bias in previous studies of scale economies in credit unions has been the omission of credit union subsidies. This paper shows that the failure to account for subsidies biases the results toward finding diseconomies of scale. After correcting for the subsidy bias, there is very strong evidence of increasing returns to scale in a sample of New South Wales credit unions, supporting the industry recommendation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baur, P.W., A.N. Berger, G.D. Ferrier, and D.B. Humphrey. “Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods.” Journal of Economics and Business 50 (1998), 85-114.
Berger, A.N. “Distribution-Free Estimates of Efficiency in the U.S. Banking Industry and Tests of the Standard Distributional Assumptions.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 4 (1993), 261-292.
Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey. “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In: Z. Griliches, E.R. Berndt, T.F. Bresnahan, and M.E. Manser, eds, Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 245-300.
Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey. “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research.” European Journal of Operational Research 98, no. 2 (1997), 175-212.
Berger, A.N. and L.J. Mester. “Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions?” Journal of Banking and Finance 21 (1997), 895-947.
Brown, R. and I. O'Connor. “Measurement of Economies of Scale in Victorian Credit Unions.” Australian Journal of Management 20, no. 1 (1995), 1-24.
Crapp, H.R. “Scale Economies in the NSW Credit Union Industry.” Australian Journal of Management 1, (1983), 33-43.
Credit Union Services Corporation (Australia) Limited. “Review of Movement Performance and Future Structure.” Issues paper, CUSCAL, 1998a.
Credit Union Services Corporation (Australia) Limited. Review of Movement Performance and Future Structure. Interim report, CUSCAL, 1998b.
Esho, N. “The Determinants of Efficiency in New South Wales Credit Unions.” Ph.D. thesis, The University of New South Wales, 1998a.
Esho, N. “The Determinants of Cost Efficiency in New South Wales Credit Unions: 1985-1993.” The University of New South Wales, School of Banking and Finance, Working Paper Series 1998-05 1998b.
Esho, N. and I.G. Sharpe. “Long-Run Estimates of Technological Change and Scale Economies in a Dynamic Framework: Australian Permanent Building Societies, 1974-1990.” Journal of Banking and Finance 19 (1995), 1135-1157.
Fixler, D.J. and K.D. Zieschang. “User Costs, Shadow Prices and the Real Output of Banks.” In: Z. Griliches, ed., Output Measurement in the Services Sector. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 219-243.
Flannery, M.J. “An Economic Evaluation of Credit Unions in the United States.” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Research Report no. 54 (1974).
Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell, and P.V. Eeckaut. “Evaluating the Performance of U.S. Credit Unions.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, (1993), 251-265.
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1993.
Hardwick, P. “Multiproduct Cost Attributes: A Study of U.K. Building Societies.” Oxford Economics Papers 2 (1990), 446-461.
Hughes, J.P., W. Lang, L.J. Mester, and C.-G. Moon. “Efficient Banking Under Interstate Branching.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28 (1996), 1045-1071.
Ivaldi, M., N. Ladoux, H. Ossard, and M. Simioni. “Comparing Fourier and Translog Specifications of Multiproduct Technology: Evidence from an Incomplete Panel of French Farmers.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (1996), 649-667.
Kim, Y.H. “Economies of Scale and Economies of Scope in Multiproduct Financial Institutions: Further Evidence from Credit Unions.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 18, no. 2 (1986), 220-226.
Koot, R.S. “On Economies of Scale in Credit Unions.” The Journal of Finance 33, no. 4 (1978), 1087-1094.
Lang, G. and P. Welzel. “Efficiency and Technical Progress in Banking. Empirical Results for a Panel of German Cooperative Banks.” Journal of Banking and Finance 20 (1996), 1003-1023.
McAllister, P.H. and D. McManus. “Resolving the Scale Efficiency Puzzle in Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17 (1993), 389-405.
Mitchell, K. and N.M. Onvural. “Economies of Scale and Scope at Large Commercial Banks: Evidence from the Fourier Flexible Functional Form.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, no. 2 (1996), 178-199.
Murray, J.D. and R.B. White. “Economies of Scale and Deposit-Taking Financial Institutions in Canada, A Study of British Columbia Credit Unions.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 12, no. 1 (1980), 58-70.
Murray, J.D. and R.B. White. “Economies of Scale and Economies of Scope in Multiproduct Financial Institutions, Study of British Columbia Credit Unions.” The Journal of Finance 281, no. 3 (1983), 887-902.
Pope, R.D. “Estimating Functional Forms with Special Reference to Agriculture: Discussion.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984), 223-225.
Shaffer, S. “A Revenue-Restricted Cost Study of 100 Large Banks.” Applied Financial Economics 4 (1994), 193-205.
Shaffer, S. “Translog Bias Under Declining Average Costs.” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper No. 95-13, May 1995.
Westley, G.D. and S. Shaffer. “Credit Union Policies and Performance in Latin America.” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, no. 9 (1999), 1303-1329.
Wolken, J.D. and F.J. Navratil. “Economies of Scale in Credit Unions: Further Evidence.” The Journal of Finance 25, no. 3 (1980), 769-775.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Esho, N. Scale Economies in Credit Unions: Accounting for Subsidies Is Important. Journal of Financial Services Research 18, 29–43 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026523506546
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026523506546