Andresen, L., Barrett, E., Powell, J. & Wieneke, C. (1985). Planning and monitoring courses: University teachers reflect on their teaching. Instructional Science 13: 305–328.
Google Scholar
Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty, Second Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Astin, A.W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel 25: 297–308.
Google Scholar
Braxton, J.M. & Hargens, L.L. (1996). Variations among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J.C. Smart, ed, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol XI. New York: Agathon Press.
Google Scholar
Donald, J.G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education 54: 31–41.
Google Scholar
Donald, J.G. (1990). University professors' views of knowledge and validation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 242–249.
Google Scholar
Dressel, P. & Marcus, D. (1982). Teaching and Learning in College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Eisner, E.W. & Vallance, E.C., eds (1974). Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum. Berkeley: McCutchan.
Google Scholar
Eljamal, M., Stark, J.S., Sharp, S., Arnold, G. & Lowther, M.A. (1998). Listening for disciplinary differences in faculty goals for effective teaching. Journal of General Education 47: 117–148.
Google Scholar
Eljamal, M., Stark, J.S., Arnold, G.L. & Sharp, S. (1999). Intellectual development: A complex teaching goal. Studies in Higher Education 24: 7–25.
Google Scholar
Franklin, J. & Theall, M. (1992). Disciplinary differences: Instructional goals and activities, measures of student performance, and student ratings of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.
Hativa, N. (1993). Attitudes towards instruction of faculty in mathematics and the physical sciences: Discipline-and situation-specific teaching patterns. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 24: 579–594.
Google Scholar
Hativa, N. (1997). Teaching in a research university: Professors' conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, March.
Lowther, M.A., Stark, J.S., Genthon, M.L. & Bentley, R.J. (1990). Comparing introductory course planning among full-time and part-time faculty. Research in Higher Education 31(6): 495–517.
Google Scholar
Nelson-Laird, T.F. (1998) Student-centered influences on planning introductory college courses: gender and disciplinary differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, Florida.
Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of Meaning: A Philosophy of the Curriculum for General Education. New York: McGraw Hill.
Google Scholar
Posner, G. & Rudnitsky, A. (1986). Course Design: A Guide to Curriculum Development for Teachers, 3rd edition. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Posner, G. & Strike, K. (1976). A categorization scheme for principles of sequencing content. Review of Educational Research 46(4): 665–689.
Google Scholar
Powell, J.P. & Shanker, V.S. (1982). The course planning and monitoring activities of a university teacher. Higher Education 11: 289–301.
Google Scholar
Smart, J.C. & Ethington, C.A. (1995). Disciplinary and institutional differences in undergraduate education goals. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich, eds, Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 64, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S. (1998). Classifying professional preparation programs. Journal of Higher Education 69(4): 353–383.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S. & Lattuca, L.R. (1997). Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Action. Needham Hghts, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S., Lowther, M.A., Bentley, R.J., Ryan, M.P., Genthon, M.L., Martens, G.G. & Wren, P.A. (1990a). Planning Introductory College Courses: Influences on Faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S., Lowther, M.A., Ryan, M.P., Bomotti, S.S., Genthon, M.L., Martens, G.G. & Haven, C.L. (1988a). Reflections on Course Planning: Faculty and Students Consider Influences and Goals. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S., Lowther, M.A., Bentley, R.J. & Martens, G.G. (1990b). Disciplinary differences in course planning. Review of Higher Education 13(2): 141–165.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S., Lowther, M.A. Ryan, M.P. & Genthon, M.L. (1988b). Faculty reflect on course planning. Research in Higher Education 29(3): 219–240.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S., Lowther, M.A., Sharp, S. & Arnold, G.L. (1997). Program-level curriculum planning: An exploration of faculty perspectives on two different campuses. Research in Higher Education 38(1): 99–130.
Google Scholar
Stark, J.S. & Shaw, K.M. (1990). Do College Faculty Report Different Influences when Planning Introductory and Advanced Courses? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Google Scholar
Thielens, W., Jr. (1987). The disciplines and undergraduate lecturing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, April.
Toombs, W. (1977–1978). The application of design-based curriculum analysis to general education. Higher Education Review 1: 18–19.
Google Scholar
Warme B. & Lundy, K. (1988). Erosion of an idea: The presence of part-time faculty. Studies in Higher Education 13(2): 201–213.
Google Scholar
Weinstein, C.E. & Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock, ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching, pp. 315–327. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar