Skip to main content
Log in

An Investigation of Treatment Integrity and Outcomes in Wraparound Services

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on wraparound services has been generally positive, but has failed to include data regarding treatment integrity. Without such data, conclusions drawn from such studies are weakened. This study followed 28 children and adolescents receiving wraparound services in rural central Pennsylvania. Treatment integrity was defined as the percentage of service hours prescribed vs. received, and behavioral outcomes were defined as Total Problem Behavior T Scores on the Child Behavior Checklist. Preliminary analyses failed to reveal significant differences in sample means between included subjects and those excluded due to missing data. Outcome behavior ratings were significantly improved over baseline ratings. Regression analyses, however, failed to find a significant effect for treatment integrity when used in an outcome prediction equation for Therapeutic Support Staff, Mobile Therapy services, or Behavioral Specialist wraparound services. These results suggest that adherence to prescribed treatment hours may not be related to behavioral outcomes in a wraparound service setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Achenbach, T. & Edelbrock, C. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/ 4–18. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E., Burchard, J., & Yoe, J. (1995). Evaluating the Vermont system of care: Outcomes associated with community-based wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J., Burchard, S., Sewell, R., & VanDenBerg, J. (1993). One kid at a time: Evaluative case studies and description of the Alaska youth initiative demonstration project. National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health. Center for Child Health and Mental Health Policy, Georgetown University Child Development Center.

  • Clark, H., Lee, B., Prange, M., & McDonald, B. (1996). Children lost within the foster care system: Can wraparound services improve placement outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., Schaefer, M., Burchard, J., & Welkowitz, J. (1992). Wrapping community-based mental health services around children with a severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of project wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., Osuch, R., & Reddit, C. (1996). School-based applications of the wraparound process: Early results on service provision and student outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F.M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F., Gansle, K., & Noell, G. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollin, C.R. (1995). The meaning and implications of 'Programme integrity'. In J. McGuire (Ed.). What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 195–208). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V.S. (1981). Staff drift: A problem in program integrity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. & McClelland, G. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt-Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A., Sondheimer, D. (1994). Building the research base for children's mental health services: Special series: Center for mental health service research projects. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders, 2, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky L. & DeRubeis, R. (1984). The use of psychotherapy treatment manuals: A small revolution in psychotherapy research style. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncher, F. & Prinz, R. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L., Homer, A., & Wonderlich, S. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, A. (1996). Bows and ribbons, tape and twine: Wrapping the wraparound process for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salend, S.J. (1984). Therapy outcome research: Threats to treatment integrity. Behavior Modification, 8, 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J.E. (1993). Integration of individualized mental health services into the system of care for children and adolescents. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 20, 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toffalo, D.A.D. An Investigation of Treatment Integrity and Outcomes in Wraparound Services. Journal of Child and Family Studies 9, 351–361 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026496524181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026496524181

Navigation