Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards More Efficient Compensation Programmes for Tourists' Benefits From Agriculture in Europe

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper covers nonmarket services provided by farmers for recreational purposes in several Central European regions. A regionally specified general equilibrium model is used to derive the efficiency conditions for a competitive equilibrium to guarantee a Pareto optimal outcome. Moreover, we present green agricultural compensation programmes in Europe and their assessment from an economic perspective. The empirical analysis focuses on tourists' willingness to pay (WTP) for the provision of agricultural landscape-enhancing services in Austria. A comparison of these measures with current voluntary compensation payments made to farmers for the preservation of an agricultural countryside in several Austrian tourism communities suggests that the hypothetical contingent valuation (CV) results represent a valid order of magnitude for the value of recreation-related agricultural services. As far as agricultural policy is concerned, environmental improvement, the stabilization of agricultural income levels, diminishing intrasectoral income differences, and the development of economically disadvantaged rural regions can be expected from directly subsidizing farmers for the provision of countryside amenities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993), ‘Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation’, Federal Register 58(10).

  • Baumol, W. J. and W. E. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy. Second edition, Cambridge University Press.

  • Braden J. B. and C. D. Kolstad (1991), Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. North Holland.

  • Cropper, M. L. and W. E. Oates (1992), ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R. G., G.W. Harrison and R. E. Rutstrom (1995), ‘Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive Compatible?’, American Economic Review 85, 260–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. and J. A. Hausman (1994), ‘Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4/8, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, L. (1992), ‘The Non-market Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 19, 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubgaard, A. (1994), ‘Valuing Recreation Benefits from the Mols Bjerge Area, Denmark’, in A. Dubgaard, I. Bateman and M. Merlo, eds., Identification and Valuation of Public Benefits from Farming and Countryside Stewardship. Bruxelles, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. (1994), The Conceptual Underpinnings of the Contingent Valuation Method. Paper presented at DOE/EPA Workshop on Using Contingent Valuation to Measure Non-Market Values, Herndon, Virginia 1994.

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1994), ‘Contingent Valuation and Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4/8, 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlo, M. and F. Della Puppa (1994), ‘Public Benefit Valuation in Italy. A Review of Forestry and Farming Applications’, in A. Dubgaard, I. Bateman and M. Merlo, eds., Identification and Valuation of Public Benefits from Farming and Countryside Stewardship. Bruxelles, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. Baltimore: John Hopkins University for Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navrud, S. (1992), Pricing the European Environment. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, H. R., R. G. Cummings, P. T. Ganderton, G.W. Harrison and T. McGuckin (1994), ‘Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments’, Land Economics 70(2), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruckner, G. J. (1995), ‘Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria. An Application of the CVM’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 22(2), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seip, K. and J. Strand (1992), ‘Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: A Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment’, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, A-4040, Linz, Austria

    Franz Hackl & Gerald J. Pruckner

Authors
  1. Franz Hackl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerald J. Pruckner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hackl, F., Pruckner, G.J. Towards More Efficient Compensation Programmes for Tourists' Benefits From Agriculture in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics 10, 189–205 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026480123406

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026480123406

Search

Navigation