Skip to main content

Developmental aspects of kin recognition

Genetica volume 104, pages 199–205 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

The ability to recognise kin requires the individual to possess a variety of abilities. Individuals must produce a cue which indicates relatedness, they must process this cue to determine relatedness and then must act on this cue. Research has concentrated on the first and final stage of this process, i.e., the cues of kinship and kin correlated behaviour. Little attention has been paid to how individuals process cues to determine relatedness. This paper discusses how individuals ‘recognise’ kin, the exhibition of kin correlated behaviour and considers the role of the MHC in these processes. Two broad theories have emerged to explain how individuals recognise their kin: either a recognition gene(s) or some experiential mechanism. In mammals there is no evidence to suggest that recognition (the processing of the cue) is under genetic control but rather is the result of experience, learning about related individuals during development. Moreover studies on kin recognition in the domestic dog suggest that all kin are not recognised by the same process but different classes of kin, parents, siblings may well be recognised using different means. Studies of kin correlated behaviour suggest that the behaviour exhibited towards kin by Mongolian gerbils is mediated by the environment. Factors of environmental familiarity, sex and developmental age all affect the response of individuals to kin and non‐kin. In these situations the ability to recognise kin does not change but the exhibition of kin correlated behaviour changes according to environmental conditions. These studies indicate that kin recognition may not be the ‘unified’ process previously thought and thus any explanations of the proximate and ultimate causation of kin recognition need to encompass this complexity. The question remains of whether the MHC is complex enough to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abrams, R.M., K.J. Gerhardt & A.J.M. Peters, 1995. Transmission of sound and vibration to the fetus, pp. 315-330 in Fetal Development. A Psychobiological Perspective, edited by J.P. Lecanuet, W.P. Fifer, N.A. Krasnegor and W.P. Smotherman. LEA, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.J., 1991. Kinship and social behaviour: the trouble with relatives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 310-312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P.P.G., 1979. How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Anim. Behav. 27: 470-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P.P.G., 1981. Control of sensitivity to the environment during development, pp. 432-453 in Behavioral Development. The Bielefield Interdisciplinary Project, edited by K. Immelmann, G.W. Barlow, L. Petrinovich and M. Main. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyse, E.A., G.K. Beauchamp, K. Yamazaki & J. Bard, 1991. Genetic components of kin recognition in mammals, pp. 148- 161 in Kin Recognition, edited by P.G. Hepper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.L., 1983. Some paradoxical goals of cells and organisms: the role of the MHC, pp. 111-124 in Ethical Questions in Brain and Behavior, edited by D.W. Pfaff. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.L. & A. Eklund, 1994. Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. Am. Natur. 143: 435-461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. & M. Bekoff, 1986. What does ‘kin recognition’ mean. Ethology 72: 342-345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J.A., 1993. Parent-offspring interactions in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. PhD Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.

  • Colgan, P., 1983. Comparative Social Recognition. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., 1982. The Extended Phenotype. W.H. Freeman, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCasper, A.J. & W.P. Fifer, 1980. Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science 208: 1174-1176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D.J.C. & C.D. Michener, 1987. Kin Recognition in Animals. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A., 1990. Do animals really recognise kin? Anim. Behav. 39: 42-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, H.J., 1982. Kin recognition in white-footed deermice (Peromyscus leucopus). Anim. Behav. 30: 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, P., 1988. On beyond neuronal specificity: problems in going from cells to networks and from networks to behavior. Adv. Neural Behav. Dev. 3: 1-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D., 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theo. Biol. 7: 1-16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D., 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behaviour II. J. Theo. Biol. 7: 17-52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1983. Sibling recognition in the rat. Anim. Behav. 31: 1177-1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1986a. Can recognition genes for kin recognition exist? pp. 31-35 in The Individual and Society, edited by L. Passera and J.-P. Lachaud. Privat, IEC, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1986b. Kin recognition: functions and mechanisms. A review. Biol. Rev. 61: 63-93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1987. The amniotic fluid: an important priming role in kin recognition. Anim. Behav. 35: 1343-1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1990. Fetal olfaction, pp. 282-288 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V, edited by D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze and S.E. Natynzcuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1991a. Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1991b. Recognizing kin: ontogeny and classification, pp. 259-288 in Kin Recognition, edited by P.G. Hepper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1992a. Fetal psychology. An embryonic science, pp. 129-156 in Fetal Behaviour, edited by J.G. Nijhuis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P.G., 1992b. Comparative prenatal learning and behaviour. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 44B (special issue).

  • Hepper, P.G., 1994. Long-term retention of kinship recognition established during infancy in the domestic dog. Behavioural Processes 33: 3-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W.G. & P.W. Sherman, 1983. Kin recognition in animals. American Scientist 71: 46-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareem, A.M. & C.J. Barnard, 1982. The importance of kinship and familiarity in social interactions between mice. Anim. Behav. 30: 594-601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, D.A., J. Zemmour, P.D. Ennis & P. Parham, 1990. Evolution of class 1MHCgenes and proteins: from natural selection to thymic selection. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 8: 23-63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, J.W. & D. Renouf, 1987. Bonding and weaning in Harbor seals, Phoca vitulina. J. Mammal. 68: 445-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. & A.L. Hughes, 1990. Polymorphism and evolution of the major histocompatibility complex loci in mammals, pp. 222-247 in Evolution at the Molecular Level, edited by R.K. Selander, A.G. Clark and T.S, Whittam. Sinauer, Mass.

  • Porter, R.H., J.A. Matochik & J.W. Makin, 1983. Evidence for phenotype matching in spinymice (Acomys cahirinus). Anim. Behav. 31: 978-984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R.H., 1988. The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: superfamily Muroidea. Behav. Genet. 18: 483-494.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Querlen, D., X. Renard, C. Boutteville & G. Crepin, 1989. Hearing by the human fetus? Seminars in Perinatology 13: 409-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. & A. Grafen, 1981. Are green beard genes outlaws? Anim. Behav. 29: 954-955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B., P. Orgeur & C. Arnould, 1995. Olfactory preferences in newborn lambs: possible influence of prenatal experience. Behaviour 132: 351-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R.J., 1991. Kin recognition as a functional concept. Anim. Behav. 41: 1093-1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, B. 1987. Mechanisms of kin recognition. J. Theo. Biol. 128: 159-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, K., G.K. Beauchamp, D. Kupniewski, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1988. Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240: 1331-1332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, The Queen‘s University of Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, N, Ireland, UK

    Peter G. Hepper & Jennifer Cleland

Authors
  1. Peter G. Hepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer Cleland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hepper, P.G., Cleland, J. Developmental aspects of kin recognition. Genetica 104, 199–205 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026477724836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026477724836

  • kin recognition
  • kin correlated behaviour
  • MHC