Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Numerical Methods for the Integration of Natural Satellite Systems

  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a new implementation of the recurrent power series (RPS) method which we have developed for the integration of the system of N satellites orbiting a point-mass planet. This implementation is proved to be more efficient than previously developed implementations of the same method. Furthermore, its comparison with two of the most popular numerical integration methods: the 10th-order Gauss–Jackson backward difference method and the Runge–Kutta–NystrRKN12(10)17M shows that the RPS method is more than one order of magnitude better in accuracy than the other two. Various test problems with one up to four satellites are used, with initial conditions obtained from ephemerides of the saturnian satellite system. For each of the three methods we find the values of the user-specified parameters (such as the method's step-size (h or tolerance (TOL)) that minimize the global error in the satellites' coordinates while keeping the computer time within reasonable limits. While the optimal values of the step-sizes for the methods GJ and RKN are all very small (less than T/100, the ones that are suitable for the RPS method are within the range: T/13<h<T/6 (T being the period of the innermost satellite of the problem). Comparing the results obtained by the three methods for these step-sizes and for the various test problems we observe the superiority of the RPS method over GJ in terms of accuracy and over RKN both in accuracy and in speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broucke, R.: 1971, ‘Solution of the N-Body Problem with Recurrent Power Series’, Celest. Mech. 4, 110–115.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Deprit, A. and Henrard, J.: 1967, ‘A Manifold of Periodic Orbits’, Boeing Scientific Research Laboratories, Document D1–82–0622, pp. 133–143.

  • Deprit, A. and Price, J. F.: 1965, ‘The Computation of Characteristic Exponents in the Planar Restricted Problem of Three Bodies’, Astron. J. 70, 836–846.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Deprit, A. and Zahar, R. V. M.: 1966, ‘Numerical Integration of an Orbit and Its Concomitant Variations by Recurrent Power Series’, ZAMP 17, 425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormand, J. R., El-Mikkawy, M. E. A. and Prince, P. J.: 1987, ‘High-Order Embedded Runge–Kutta–Nystrom Formulae’, IMA J. Num. Analysis 7, 423–430.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elipe, A. and Lara, M.: 1993, ‘Recurrent Power Series in Integration of Orbits’, AAS/AIAA 85, 2357–2368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emslie, A. G. and Walker, I. W.: 1979, ‘Studies in the Application of Recurrence Relations to Special Perturbation Methods V’, Celest. Mech. 19, 147–162.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K.: 1984, ‘Numerical Integration of the Equations of Motion of Celestial Mechanics’, Celest. Mech. 33, 127–142.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gousidou-Koutita, M.: 1980, ‘Elliptic Restricted Problem of Three Bodies, with Applications to the Dynamics of Lunar Satellites’, PhD Thesis, Univ. of Manchester.

  • Herrick, S.: 1972, ‘Astrodynamics’ Vol. 2, Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Kinoshita, H.: 1976, ‘Third-Order Solution of an Artificial-Satellite Theory’, in D. Szebehely (ed.), Dynamics of Planets and Satellites and Theories of Their Motions, Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 241–257.

  • Królikowska, M. and Sitarski, G.: 1996, ‘Evolution of the Orbit of Comet 46P/Wirtanen During 1947–2013’, Astron. Astrophys. 310, 992–998.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Milani, A. and Nobili, A. M.: 1988, ‘Integration Error Over Very Long Time Spans’, Celest. Mech. 43, 1–34.

    MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck, O.: 1992, ‘Numerical Integration of Orbital Motion Using Taylor Series’, AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Paper AAS 92–195, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

  • Quinn, T. and Tremaine, S.: 1990, ‘Roundoff Error in Long-Term Planetary Orbit Integrations’, Astron. J. 99, 1016–1023.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. E., Moran, P. E. and Black, W.: 1972, ‘Studies in the Application of Recurrence Relations to Special Perturbation Methods I’, Celest. Mech. 6, 468–482.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. T. and Taylor, D. B.: 1985, ‘Analysis of the Orbits of Titan, Hyperion and Iapetus by Numerical Integration and by Analytical Theories’, Astron. Astrophys. 147, 241–246.

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, J. F.: 1957, ‘On the Problem of Three Bodies in the Plane’, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dansk. Vid. Selskap. 31, No.3.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of Thessaloniki, 540 06, Thessaloniki, Greece

    K. G. Hadjifotinou & M. Gousidou-Koutita

Authors
  1. K. G. Hadjifotinou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Gousidou-Koutita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadjifotinou, K.G., Gousidou-Koutita, M. Comparison of Numerical Methods for the Integration of Natural Satellite Systems. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 70, 99–113 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026475908041

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026475908041

Search

Navigation