Skip to main content
Log in

External Costs of Aquaculture Production in West Virginia

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temperate hill-lands of the U.S.A. such as those in West Virginia are areas from which increasing output of farm-raised fish may be possible. However, the downstream economic impacts of current and projected future effluent as a result of aquaculture production have not been extensively studied. Using an externality framework and a combination of primary and secondary data, this study determines pollution prevention costs (PPC), and downstream pollution damage costs resulting from fish farm wastewater effluent measured as willingness to pay (WTP) for restoring water quality. PPC is estimated at $0.11 per kg of trout produced (which would add 6% to private production cost), and WTP is estimated at $0.49 per kg of trout produced (representing 25% of private production cost) at current production and price levels. This study shows that installation of filtration units is a low-cost (less than 6% of total cost) and an effective technology for controlling pollution at the source. Internalizing external costs (adding this 6% to private production costs) is one strategy that could contribute to sustainable growth of the aquaculture industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, E. E and J. B. Gratzek (1980), Fish Farming Handbook. New York, N.Y.: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, R. A. (1992), ‘Valuing Water Quality Improvements in the Monongahela National Forest Using Contingent Valuation’. M.S. thesis, West Virginia University.

  • Cropper, M. L. and W. E. Oates (1992), ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markandya, A. and J. Richardson, eds. (1992), Environmental Economics: A Reader . New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. W. (1989), Aquaculture Management. New York, N.Y.: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. S. (1992), ‘Valuing Trout Fishing in the Monongahela National Forest: A Comparison of Individual and Zonal Travel Cost Models’. M.S. thesis, West Virginia University

  • Seneca, J. J. and M. K. Taussig (1979), Environmental Economics. 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smearman, S. C. (1994), ‘An Economic analysis of Aquaculture Effluent on Water Quality in West Virginia’. M.S. thesis, West Virginia University.

  • Southern Regional Aquaculture Center (1990), ‘Budgets for Trout Production’. SRAC Pub. No. 221. Distributed courtesy of Aquaculture Info. Center, National Agricultural Library, Beltsville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1992). ‘Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation’, in A. Markandya and J. Richardson, eds., Environmental Economics: A Reader. New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press, pp. 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Aquaculture: Situation and Outlook Report. Washington, D.C. Various issues.

  • WV Division of Natural Resources (1993), ‘Aquaculture Permitting Requirements’, Water Resources Section, Industrial Branch.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smearman, S.C., D'souza, G.E. & Norton, V.J. External Costs of Aquaculture Production in West Virginia. Environmental and Resource Economics 10, 167–175 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026473221396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026473221396

Navigation