Skip to main content
Log in

Principles and Problems in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Health Care

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A remarkable surge in efforts to assess the quality of life of patients has occurred in recent years in medical research. Philosophical discussions of these developments have focused, on the one hand, on epistemological reservations about the plausibility of measuring quality of life and, on the other hand, on moral and ethical qualms about the meaning of life conveyed in such assessments. Whilst providing an important note of caution, such critiques fail to recognise two basic principles of quality of life in medical research. Firstly it is intended to provide understanding about groups and categories of patients rather than individuals. Secondly the purpose of such research is to produce generalisations about the relative costs and benefits of specific health care interventions rather than absolute judgements regarding the quality of life of patients per se. Selecting a good quality of life measure for a clinical trial requires balancing criteria such as validity with practical feasibility. Such measures will play an increasingly central role in providing research evidence to improve health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barry, M., Cherkin, D., Chang, Y., Fowler, F., Skates, S., A Randomised Trial of a Multimedia Shared Decision-making Program for Men Facing a Treatment Decision for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Disease, Management and Clinical Outcomes 1 (1997) pp. 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, N., Why we need Observational Studies to evaluate the Effectiveness of Health Care, Br Med J 312 (1996) pp. 1215–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleehen, N., Girling, D., Machin, D., Stephens, R., A Randomised Trial of Three or Six Courses of Etoposide Cyclophosphamide Methotrexate and Vincristine or Six Courses of Etoposide and Ifosfamide in Small Lung Cancer (SCLC). II Quality of Life, Br J Cancer 68 (1993) pp. 1157–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A., Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Hill, R., Assumptions of the QALY Procedure, Soc Sci Med 29 (1989) pp. 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Spiegelhalter, D., Jones, D., Quality of Life Assessment: Can we keep it simple? J Roy Stat Soc 155 (1992) pp. 353–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croog, S., Levine, S., Testa, M., Brown, B., Bulpitt, C., Jenkins, C., et al., The Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on the Quality of Life, N Engl J Med 314 (1986) pp. 1657–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyo, R., The Quality of Life, Research, and Care, Ann Intern Med 114 (1991) pp. 695–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers, P., Hand, D., Factor Analysis, Causal Indicators and Quality of Life, Qual Life Res 6 (1997) pp. 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, R., Alternative Approaches to the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life, in A. Offer (ed.), In Pursuit of the Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996a, pp. 140–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, R., Patient-Centred Approaches to the Evaluation of Health Care, in K. Fulford, S. Ersser, T. Hope (eds.), Essential Practice in Patient-Centred Care. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1996b, pp. 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, R., Ziebland, S., Jenkinson, C., Mowat, A., Mowat, A., The Importance of Sensitivity to Change as a Criterion for Selection of Health Status Measures, Qual Health Care 1 (1992) pp. 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T., Feinstein, A., A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality of Life Measurements, JAMA 272 (1994) pp. 619–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, K., Mooney, G., QALY League Tables: Handle with Care, Health Economics 2 (1993, pp. 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G., Cook, D., Health Status, Quality of Life, and the Individual, JAMA 272 (1994) pp. 630–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helewa, A., Bombardier, C., Goldsmith, C., Menchions, B., Smythe, H., Cost-effectiveness of Inpatient and Intensive Outpatient Therapy for Patients with Arthritis - a Randomised Controlled Trial, Arth Rheum 32 (1989) pp. 1505–1514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, P., Stephens, R., Machin, D., Approaches to the Analysis of Quality of Life Data: Experiences gained from a Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party Palliative Chemotherapy Trial, Qual Life Res 3 (1994) pp. 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Measurement of Health-related Quality of Life in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease, in S. Walker, R. Rosser (eds.), Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993, pp. 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juniper, E., Guyatt, G., Wilan, A., Griffith, L., Determining a Minimal Important Change in a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, J Clin Epidem 47 (1994) pp. 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazis, L., Callahan, L., Meenan, R., Pincus, T., Health Status Reports in the Care of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, J Clin Epidem 43 (1990) pp. 1243–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M., Ashmore, M., Pinch, T., Measuring the Quality of Life: A Sociaological Invention concerning the Application of Economics to Health Care, Sociology 21 (1987) pp. 541–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L., Introduction, in L. Nordenfelt (ed.), Concepts and Measurement of Quality of Life in Health Care. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorabeck, C., Bourne, R., Laupacis, A., Feeny, D., Wong, C., Tugwell, P., et al., A Double-Blind Study of 250 Cases Comparing Cemented with Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.Cost-effectiveness and its Impact on Health-related Quality of Life, Clin Orthop 210 (1994) pp. 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, M., Olschewski, M., Schulgen, G., Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials, Stat Med 10 (1991) pp. 1915–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilker, B., (ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D., Norman, G., Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki, G., Daltroy, L., Katz J., Johannesson, M., Liang, M., Interpretation of Change Scores in Ordinal Scales and Health Status Measures: The Whole may not Equal the Sum of the Parts, J Clin Epidem 49 (1996) pp. 711–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M., Simonson, D., Assessment of Quality of Life Outcomes, New Engl J Med 334 (1996) pp. 835–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugwell, P., Bombardier, C., Buchanan, W., Goldsmith, C., Grace, E., Bennett, K., et al., Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Impact on Quality of Life Assessed by Traditional Standard-Item and Individualized Patient Preference Health Status Questionnaires, Arch Intern Med 150 (1990) pp. 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderBurg, M., Measuring the Quality of Life of Patients with Angina, in S. Walker, R. Rosser (eds.), Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993, pp. 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fitzpatrick, R. Principles and Problems in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Health Care. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2, 37–46 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026466916100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026466916100

Navigation