Skip to main content
Log in

A review of MHC‐based mate preferences and fostering experiments in two congenic strains of mice

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review our studies of mate choice with two MHC‐congenic strains of mice. This work was stimulated by findings from Yamazaki and colleagues showing that male mice exhibited mate preferences for females whose MHC‐haplotype was different from their own, while female mice exhibited either no preference or a weak preference for males of a particular MHC‐haplotype (see Beauchamp et al., 1988). Since these findings were unexpected (mate choice theory predicts that females will be more selective than males), we studied the preferences of mice from two additional MHC‐congenic strains to assess the generality of the previous findings. Specifically, the goals of our research were: (1) to determine the mate preferences of congenic mice with MHC‐haplotypes derived from wild populations, (2) to compare the mate preferences of male and female mice in a test situation where each sex has a clear opportunity to make a choice, and (3) to estimate effects of cross‐fostering on each sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, G.K., K. Yamazaki, J. Bard & E.A. Boyse, 1988. Preweaning experience in the control of mating preferences by genes in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Behav. Genet. 18: 537-547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.E., P.B. Singh & B. Roser, 1987. The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats. Physiol. Behav. 40: 65-73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egid, K. & J.L. Brown, 1989. The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice. Anim. Behav. 38: 548-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, A., K. Egid & J.L. Brown, 1991. The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences of male mice. Anim. Behav. 42: 693-694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., 1974. Biological signals for self-identification, pp. 239-247 in Progress in Immunology II, edited by L. Brent and J. Holoborow. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R.L., 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection, pp. 136-179 in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871- 1971, edited by B. Campbell. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeland, E.K. & J. Klein, 1979. The histocompatibility-2 system in wild mice: VII. Serological analysis of 29 wild-derived H-2 haplotypes using antisera to inbred I-region antigens. Immunogenetics 8: 27-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, M., K. Yamazaki, G.K. Beauchamp, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1981. Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 5817-5820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, K., E.A. Boyse, V. Mike, H.T. Thaler, B.J. Mathieson, J. Abbot, J. Boyse & Z.A. Zayas, 1976. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J. Exp. Med. 144: 1324-1335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, K., M. Yamaguchi, L. Baranoski, J. Bard, E.A. Boyse & L. Thomas, 1979. Recognition among mice. J. Exp. Med. 150: 755-760.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, K., G.K. Beauchamp, D. Kupniewski, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1988. Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240: 1331-1332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arcaro, K.F., Eklund, A. A review of MHC‐based mate preferences and fostering experiments in two congenic strains of mice. Genetica 104, 241–244 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026465421201

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026465421201

Navigation