Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Exploitation of the Arcto-Norwegian Cod Stock

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-agent model for the exploitation of the Arcto-Norwegian cod stock is developed to investigate the economic benefits that can be realized from the resource, and the effect of exploitation on stock sustainability under cooperation and non-cooperation. The two agents are identified in this study as a trawl fishery versus a coastal fishery. Unlike in Munro (1979), where conflicts in the management strategies of agents arise from differences in the perceptions of the discount factor, fishing effort costs, and consumer preferences, here conflicts arise mainly from the differences in fishing gear and grounds, and the age group of cod targeted by the two agents. Using a game theoretic framework, we show that given available data, the optimum optimorum is obtained under cooperation with side payments and no predetermined harvest shares, in which case the coastal fishery buys out the trawl fishery. However, sensitivity analysis shows that if the price premium assumed for mature cod is taken away, the trawl fishery takes over as the producer of the optimum optimorum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, L. G. (1975a), ‘Criteria for Maximizing the Economic Yield of an Internationally Exploited Fishery’, in H. G. Knight, ed., The Future of International Fisheries Management. St. Paul: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. G. (1975b), ‘Optimum Economic Yield on an Internationally Utilized Common Property Resource’, Fishery Bulletin 73, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. and J. G. Sutinen (1984), ‘A Survey of Stochastic Bioeconomics: Methods and Results’, Marine Resource Economics 1(2), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. and Flaaten, O. (1991a), Non-cooperative and Cooperative Management of Trans-boundary, Interdependent Natural Resources. Dep. of Econ. and Admin., Univ. of Tromsø Working Paper.

  • Armstrong, C. and Flaaten, O. (1991b), ‘The Optimal Management of a Transboundary Fish Resource-The Arcto-Norwegian Cod Stock’, in R. Arnason and T. Bjorndal, eds., Essays on the Economics of Migratory Fish Stocks. Studies in Contemporary Economics . Berlin: Springler-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C., H. Bergland, A. Eide, Flaaten, O. and N. J. Larsen (1991), Torskefiskets Økonomi og regulering (The Economics and Management of the Cod Fishery. In Norwegian). Rapport SR0509, FORUT, TromsØ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1982), Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. London: Chancellor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavazutti and Flåm (1992), ‘Evolution to Selected Nash Equilibria’, in E. Giannessi, ed., Nonsmooth Optimization Methods and Application. London: Gordon and Beach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway (1989-1990), Fishery Statistics. Oslo, Norway.

  • Fischer, R. D. and Mirman, L. J. (1992), ‘Strategic Dynamic Interaction: Fish Wars’. Journal of Dynamics and Control 16, 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flåm, S. D. (1993a), ‘Path to Constrained Nash Equilibria’, Applied Mathematics and Optimisation 27, 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flåm, S. D. (1993b), ‘Cournot Oligopoly; Adaptive Approximations to Stochastic Equilibrium’. Dept. of Economics, University of Bergen, Working paper No. 0393, 10

  • Hannesson, R. (1978). Tralfiske eller skreifiske? Om optimal beskatning av den norske-arktiske torkbestanden. (Trawl Fishing or Coastal Fishing for Mature Cod? On the Optimal Management of the Arcto-Norwegian Cod Stock. In Norwegian.) Universitetet i Bergen, Økonomiske skrifter nr. 12. Bergen.

  • Hannesson, R. (1993). Bioeconomic Analysis of Fisheries. London: Fishing News Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES (1992): Report of the Artic fisheries Working Group. Copenhagen.

  • ICES (1996): Report of the Artic Fisheries Working Group. Copenhagen.

  • Kaitala, V. T. (1986), ‘Game Theory Models in Fisheries Management: A Survey’, in T. Basar, ed., Dynamic Games and Applications in Economics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjelby, T. (1993), ‘Det norske torskefiskeriet som nasjonalformue’, SEFOS N OTAT 90 (In Norwegian).

  • Larsen, R. B. and B. Isaksen (1993), Size and Selectivity of Rigid Sorting Grids in Bottom Trawls for Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) and Haddock (Melanogrammus Aeglefinus), ICES Marine Science Symposium 196, 178–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Levhari, D. and L. J. Mirman (1980), ‘The Great Fish War: An Example Using a Dynamic Cournot-Nash Solution’, Bell Journal of Economics 11, 322–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, G.R. (1979), ‘The Optimal Management of Transboundary Renewable Resources’, Canadian Journal of Economics 12(8), 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, G. R. (1990), ‘The Optimal Management of Transboundary Fisheries: Game Theoretic Considerations’, Natural Resource Modelling 4, 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1953), ‘Two-Person Cooperative Games’, Econometrica 21, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila, U. R. (1995), ‘Irreversible Capital Investment in a Two-stage Bimatric Fishery Game Model’, Marine Resource Economics 10(3), 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila, U. R. (1996), ‘Strategic Dynamic Interaction: The Case of Barent Sea Fisheries’. Paper presented at an International Workshop on Assessment and Distribution of Harvest Quotas in Fisheries, July 1996, Geiranger, Norway. Marine Resource Economics, forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sumaila, U.R. Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Exploitation of the Arcto-Norwegian Cod Stock. Environmental and Resource Economics 10, 147–165 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026459309123

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026459309123

Navigation