Skip to main content
Log in

Disciplinary Practices in Nebraska's Public Schools

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing rates of youth violence and crime have exerted pressure on schools to maintain an orderly learning environment. Exclusionary measures, a common disciplinary procedure, however, have been under intense scrutiny. Our study examined disciplinary practices in elementary and secondary schools by surveying building administrators. Findings indicate strong correlation between level (secondary) and size of school, and socioeconomic status of students and rates of disciplinary actions; significant differences between school levels on disciplinary action for similar offenses and on availability of support programs; and differences in beliefs between elementary and secondary level administrators on the consequences of exclusionary actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Blyth, E. & Milner, J. (1993). Exclusion from school: A first step in exclusion from society? Children and Society, 7, 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Positive Change. (1992). Keeping children in school: Sounding the alarm on suspension. Oakland, CA: Urban Strategies Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRidder, L. (1991, February). How suspension and expulsion contribute to dropping out. The Education Digest, 45–47.

  • Elam, S.M., Rose, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. (1996). The 28th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitude toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. (1997). Safe and drug-free schools: Balancing accountability with state and local flexibility. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D.C. (1997). School-based crime prevention. In L. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising (pp. 5–1–5–74). College Park, MD: Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (1994). Primary age children excluded from school: A multi-agency focus for concern. Children and Society, 8, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. & Friedland, B. (1996). Suspension, a wake up call: Rural educator's attitudes toward suspension. In rural goals 2000: Building programs that work. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig v. Doe, 108 S. Ct. 592 (1988).

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Public Law 105–17, 20 U.S.C. Chapter 33, Section 1415 et seq. (EDLAW, 1997).

  • Katsiyannis, A. & Maag, W.J. (1998). Disciplining students with disabilities: Practice considerations for implementing IDEA '97. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, G. (1995). Preventing antisocial behavior in the schools. Journal of Applied Analysis, 28, 467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R.R., Pollard, C.J., & Meers, G.D. (1995). A sociological, psychological and educational profile of adjudicated youth with disabilities. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 17 (2), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pungello, E.P., Kupersmidt, J.B., Burchinal, M.R., & Patterson, C.J. (1996). Environmental risk factors and children's achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 32, 755–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, L.C., Gallup, A.M., & Elam, S.M. (1997). The 29th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitude toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safer, D. (1986). The stress of secondary school for vulnerable students. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 15, 500–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • School Board of Prince William County v. Malone, 762 F.2d 1210 (4th Cir. 1985).

  • Taylor-Greene, S., Brown, D., Nelson, L., Longton, J., Gassman, T., Cohen, J., Swartz, J., Horner, R., Sugai, G., & Hall, S. (1997). School-wide behavioral support: Starting the year off right. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R.E., Masse, B., Perron, D., Leblanc, M., Schwartzman, A.E., & Ledingham, J.E. (1992). Early disruptive behavior, poor school achievement, delinquent behavior, and delinquent personality longitudinal analyses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (1996). Dropout rates in the United States: 1994. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (1997). The Condition of Education, 1997 (NCES 97–388).Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H.M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Pink, W., Crain, R., & Moles, O. (1982). Student suspension: A critical appraisal. Urban Review, 14, 245–303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winbinger, B., Katsiyannis, A. & Archwamety, T. Disciplinary Practices in Nebraska's Public Schools. Journal of Child and Family Studies 9, 389–399 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026452709160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026452709160

Navigation