Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Triangulation in a Study of Refugee Well-Being

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article illustrates the use of triangulation in a study of refugee well-being. While the study was driven by a qualitative paradigm, information and data from qualitative and quantitative methods were integrated in order to fully explore, describe and understand the phenomena being studied. Hence, through triangulating information and data from an ethnographic interview, demographic and health questionnaires, and observations, the subjective and objective aspects of refugee experience and well-being were fully revealed. The advantages of triangulation, its pitfalls, and the controversy surrounding this methodology within the scientific health community are discussed. Finally, the author offers recommendations pertaining to the use of methodological triangulation for other investigators who might consider employing this design in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unravelling the Mystery of Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aroian, K.J. & Potsdaughter, C.A. (1989, Summer). Multiple-method, cross-cultural assessment of psychological distress. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 21(2).

  • Blalock, M.M. (1984). Sociological Theory and Research: A Critical Appraisal. NewYork: The Free Press, pp. 373–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research, Chapter 6. London, U.K.: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, N. (1989, Winter). Standards for qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly 2(1): 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J.W. (1993, August). Linking qualitative and quantitative methods: Integrating cultural factors into public health. Qualitative Health Research 3(3): 198–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P.N. & Yaros, P.S. (1988). Research blenders: Commentary and response. Nursing Science Quarterly 1(4): 147–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1970). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., pp. 271–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.W. (1991). Stress and Adaptation in the Context of Culture: Depression in a Southern Black Community. Albany: State of University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M.E. (1987, Fall). Methodological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 19(3): 130–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, J.M. & Maclean, H.M. (1993, April). A critical perspective on research and knowledge development in health promotion. Canadian Journal of Public Health 83(S1): S72-S76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, C., & Prein, G. (1997). Triangulation: Validity and empirically-based hypothesis construction. Quality and Quantity: An International Journal of Methodology 31: 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N.G. & Fielding, J.L. (1986). Linking Data: The Articulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, J.A. (1993). The use of across-method triangulation in the study of sleep concerns in healthy older adults. Advances in Nursing Science 16(2): 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. & Howard, P. (1992). The use of ethnography and structured observations in the study of risk factors for the transmission of diarrhea in highland Papua New Guinea. Medical Anthropology 15: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, J.B. (1992, April). Health promotion through healthy public policy: The contribution of complimentary research methods. Canadian Journal of Public Health 83(S1): S11-S18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madey, D.L. (1982). Benefits of qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation with illustrations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 4: 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.E. (1986, April). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science 8(3): 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, J. (1996). The uneasy engagement of human development and ethnography. In: R. Jessor, A. Colby, & A. Shweder (eds), Ethnography and Human Development.Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M. (1991, March/April). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research 40(1): 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noshpitz, J.D. & Coddington, D.R. (1990). Stressors and the Adjustment Disorders. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, S.A. & Polifroni, C.E. (1990, Winter). The nature of scientific truth. Nursing Science Quarterly 5(4): 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pender, N.J. (Fall, 1990). Expressing health through lifestyle patterns. Nursing Science Quarterly 3(3): 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1988). Sociological Theory (2nd edn). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G.B. & Wilson, B.L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review 9: 627–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, S.D. (1978). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1335–1359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B.N. (1980). The refugee experience: Defining the parameters of a field of study. International Migration Review 15(1): 320–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.H. (1991). The Structure of Sociological Theory (5th edn). Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopinak, J.K. The Use of Triangulation in a Study of Refugee Well-Being. Quality & Quantity 33, 169–183 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026447822732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026447822732

Keywords

Navigation