Skip to main content
Log in

Early generation testing for yield and physiological components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection of superior crosses of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in early generations would increase the probability of identifying superior lines. The objective of this study was to determine the potential of selecting for physiological traits identified in a yield model [crop growth rate (C), reproductive duration (DR) and partitioning (p)] in segregating populations. Forty populations and nine parental lines were evaluated in replicated trials in 1992 (F2, 1993 (F3) and 1994 (F4) at three locations in Niger. Physiological traits were estimated from final yield and biomass as well as data on flowering and maturity. Regressions from two different parent-offspring generations (F2: F3 and F3: F4) were calculated. The results were compared to determine if early generation performance accurately predicts the performance of cross bulks in later generations. Differences were observed among populations and parents for all traits. Effects of locations were significant for C, p and DR in F2 and F3 but nonsignificant for yield and C in F4. Regression coefficients from F3: F2 were 0.10 ± 0.08 for C, 0.45 ± 0.17 for p, 0.10 ± 0.03 for DR and 0.16 ± 0.03 for pod yield. Based on F3: F4 regression, the coefficients were 0.12 ± 0.23 for C, 0.46 ± 0.17 for p and 0.57 ± 0.17 for yield. Parent-offspring correlations were in most cases similar to the regression values. It was concluded that selection for yield and model components in early generation bulks may inneffective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandyopadhayay, A., V. Arunachalan & K. Venkajah, 1985. Ef-ficient selection intensity in early generation index selection in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Gen. 71: 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.J., G.C. Wright & G.L. Hammer, 1992. Night temperature affects radiation use efficiency in peanut. Crop Sci. 32: 1329–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, J., L.K. Fussel & L. Herrmann, 1993. Soil and crop growth variability in West African semiarid tropics: a possible risk reducing factor for substance farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 45: 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffelt, T.A. & R.O. Hammonds, 1974. Correlation and heritability studies of nine characters in parental and intra-specific cross populations of Arachis hypogaea. Oléagineaux. 29: 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, W.G., R.L. McGraw & K.J. Boote, 1978. Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Sci. 18: 1015–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, G.C.J. & J.C. Miller, 1985. Estimation of heritability by parent-offspring regression. Theor. Appl. Genet. 53: 650–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K.J. & T. Horner, 1957. Heritability in standard units. Agron. J. 49: 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genstat 5 Committee, 1993. Genstat 5 release 3 Reference manual. Oxford Science Publications.

  • Greenberg, D.C., J.H.Williams & B.J. Ndunguru, 1992. Differences in yield determining processes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes in varied drought environments. Ann. Appl. Biol. 120: 557–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halward, T.M., J.C. Wynne & E.J. Monteverde-Penso, 1990. Effectiveness of early generation testing as applied to a recurrent selection program in peanut. Peanut Science 17: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iroume, R.N. & D.A. Knauft, 1987. Heritabilities and correlations for pod yield and leafspot resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Implications for early generation selection. Peanut Science 14: 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, J.J., J.C. Wynne & J.O. Rawlings, 1978. Early generation variability and heritability estimates in crosses of virginia and spanish peanuts. Oleagineux 33: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam, S.N., S.L. Dwivedi & R.W. Gibbons, 1991. Groundnut breeding, constraints, achievements and future possibilities. Plant Breeding Abst. 61: 1127–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D.H., J.P. Baudoin, J. Beaver, D.P. Coyne, D.E Halseth, P.N. Masaya, H.M. Munger, J.R. Myers, M. Silbernagel, K.S. Yourstone & R.W. Zobel, 1993. Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. & J.S. Drexler, 1981. A nondestructive method for determining peanut pod maturity. Peanut Science 8: 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.H., 1992. Concepts for the application of crop physiological models to crop breeding. In: S.N. Nigam (Ed.), Groundnut — A Global Perspective: Proceedings of an International Workshop ICRISAT Center, India, 1991, November 25. ICRISAT Patancheru, India, pp. 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.H. & N.P. Saxena, 1991. The use of non-destructive measurement and physiological models of yield determination to investigate differences in seed yield between genotypes of desi' chickpeas (Cicer arietinum). Annu. Appl. Biol. 119: 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.H., R.C. Nageswara Rao, F. Dougbedji & H.S. Talwar, 1996. Radiation interception and modelling as an alternative to destructive samples in crop growth. Ann. Appl. Biol. 129: 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, J.C., 1976. Evaluation of early generation testing in peanuts. Peanut Sci. 3: 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ntare, B. Early generation testing for yield and physiological components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 107, 141–147 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026441615872

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026441615872

Navigation