Skip to main content
Log in

Intertemporal Effects of Environmental Mandates

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental mandates can impose large costs on the businesses that must comply with them. Understanding the effects of those costs on production decisions may require a dynamic framework if environmental damages (and the costs of complying with mandates) depend on cumulative production or the passage of time. This paper focuses on the time dimension of general categories of fixed and variable costs arising from different types of mandates. The paper develops an optimal control model to predict how such costs may jointly affect current production rates, plant closure dates, and cumulative production. Theoretical results, derived from the comparative statics of the system of equations describing the solution to that model, identify circumstances in which the policy goals of greater production and greater environmental protection may not always be at odds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cropper, M. L. and W. E. Oates (1992), ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey', J.E.L. 30, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. F. and B. Hool (1981), ‘Resource Taxation with Heterogeneous Quality and Endogenous Reserves', J.Publ.Econ. 16, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deily, M. E. and W. B. Gray (1991), ‘Enforcement of Pollution Regulations in a Declining Industry', J.Environ.Manag. 21(3), 260–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. M. (1988), ‘ATest of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: Results fromthe Petroleum Industry', Rev.Econ.and Statis. 70(1), 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaps, T. (1985), ‘The Taxation of Nonreplenishable Natural Resources Revisited', J.Environ.Econ. Manag. 3(1), 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. G., A. K. Kashyap, and T. M. Whited (1993), ‘Internal Finance and Firm Investment', National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., Working Paper No. 4392.

  • Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz (1978), ‘Optimal Exhaustible Resource Depletion with Endogenous Technical Change', Rev.Econ.Studies 45(139), 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz (1981), Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. North Holland, New York.

  • Levhari, D. and N. Liviatan (1977), ‘Notes on Hotelling's Economics of Exhaustible Resources', Canad.J.of Econ. 10(2), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1996), ‘Costly Pollution Abatement, Competitiveness, and Plant Location Deci-sions', National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., Working Paper No. 5490.

  • Milliman, S. R. and R. Prince (1989), ‘Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control', J.Environ.Econ.Manag. 17, 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, F. M. (1978), ‘A Model of Mining and Exploring for Exhaustible Resources', J.Environ. Econ.Manag. 5(3), 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1980), ‘Uncertainty and Exhaustible Resource Markets, J.P.E. 88(6), 1203–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. D. (1974), ‘The Optimal Use of Non-Renewable Resources: The Theory of Extraction', J.Environ.Econ.Manag. 1(1), 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, F. and C. Withagen (1991), ‘Pollution Control and the Ramsey Problem', Environ-mental and Resource Economics 1(2), 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FARMER, R.D. Intertemporal Effects of Environmental Mandates. Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 365–381 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026435321238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026435321238

Navigation