The Emergent Properties of SSM in Use: A Symposium by Reflective Practitioners
- 336 Downloads
Two careers, in industry and in university teaching at postgraduate level, have led to the development of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) in a 30-year program of action research. The most cogent comments on SSM come from reflective practitioners, and in this symposium I have asked eight such users of SSM to reflect on their experience and to address the question of what it is that happens when the approach is used in real-world problem situations. Their responses reflect their different backgrounds, experience, and ways of working, but a broad general picture emerges. This suggests that SSM (whose process does not necessarily have to be made explicit to participants in a study) can engender a process of on-going (cyclic) coherent structured learning which feels natural, and which can surface previously unexamined assumptions, thus creating an arena in which accommodations can emerge which enable and motivate "action to improve" to be taken.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adams, G. B., Forester, J., and Catron, B. L. (eds.) (1987). Policymaking, Communication and Social Learning: Essays of Sir Geoffrey Vickers, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, C. J. (1984). Metaphor and Systemic Praxis, Ph.D. dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-Year Retrospective, John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Claxton, G. (1997). Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind, Fourth Estate, London.Google Scholar
- Vickers, G. (1987). Communication and appreciation. In Adams, G. B., Forester, J., and Catron, B. L. (eds.), Policymaking, Communication and Social Learning: Essays of Sir Geoffrey Vickers, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar