Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of a Fiscal Constitution When Individuals are Theoretically Uncertain

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to the contractarian approach to constitutional economics, we follow Voigt (1999) in assuming that constitutional rules are closely connected to informal institutions and that their evolution is a matter of interest group activity and implicit re-interpretation. We add to this the assumption of theoretical uncertainty of individuals regarding the working properties of constitutional rules. Collective learning processes are considered as the third driving force of constitutional evolution, and at the same time as the source of path-dependencies which allow suboptimal constitutions to persist. Finally, it is argued that direct legislation offers more protection than a written fiscal constitution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, W. B., Ermoliev, Y. M. & Kaniovski, Y. M. (1983). “A Generalized Urn Process and Its Applications.” Cybernetics. 19, 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, M. & Stutzer, A. (2002). “Are Voters Better Informed when They Have a Larger Say in Politics?” Discussion Paper, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich.

  • Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Th. (1999). Modelling Learning in Economics, Cheltenham, Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1987). “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” American Economic Review, 77, 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. & Vanberg, V. J. (1989). “Interests and Theories in Constitutional Choice.” Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. (1985). “Constitutional Change and Agenda Control.” Public Choice. 47, 183–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N. & O'Sullivan, A. (2001). “The Local Response to Tax Limitation Measures: Do Local Governments Manipulate Voters to Increase Revenues?” Journal of Law and Economics. 44, 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2001). “Rethinking Rationality.” In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (eds.), Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W. & Tietz, R. (1990). “Ultimatum Bargaining Behaviour. A Survey and Comparison of Experimental Results.” Journal of Economic Psychology. 11, 417–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. von (1973). Rules and Order. Law, Legislation and Liberty Vol. 1, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. von (1979). The Political Order of a Free People. Law Legislation and Liberty Vol. 3, London: Routlege & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G. & Werner W. Pommerehne (1993). “Low-Cost Decisions as a Challenge to Public Choice.” Public Choice. 77, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1987). “Preference Falsification, Policy Continuity and Collective Conservatism.” Economic Journal. 97, 642–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, A. & Haury, S. (1990). “A Cognitive-Evolutionary Theory of Economic Policy.” In K. Dopfer & K. F. Raible (eds.), The Evolution of Economic Systems, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2002). “The Importance of Uncertainty in a Two-Stage Theory of Constitiutions.” In G. Brennan, H. Kliemt & R. D. Tollison (eds.), Method and Morals in Constitutional Economics, Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, A., Sexton, T. A. & Sheffrin, S. M. (1995). Property Taxes and Tax Revolts. The Legacy of Proposition 13, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A. E. & Ichniowski, C. (1991). “A National Perspective on the Nature and Effects of the Local Property Tax Revolt 1976-86.” National Tax Journal. 44, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E. (1995). “Bargaining Experiments.” In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnellenbach, J. (2002). Tax Morale, Leviathan and the Political Process. Paper presented at the Annual Conferences of the Royal Economic Society (Warwick, UK, March 24-27) and the European Public Choice Society (Belgirate, Italy, April 4-7).

  • Slembeck,T. (1997). “The Formation of Economic Policy:ACognitive-Evolutionary Approach to Policy-Making.” Constitutional Political Economy. 8, 225–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987). “The Calculus: Postscript After 25 Years.” Cato Journal. 7, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. (1994). “Hayek's Constitutional Political Economy.” In V. J. Vanberg (ed.), Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. & Buchanan, J. M. (1991). “Constitutional Choice, Rational Ignorance and the Limits of Reason.” Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie. 10, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (1999). Explaining Constitutional Change. A Positive Economics Approach. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, M. (2002). “Democracy and Opinion Falsification: Towards a New Austrian Political Economy.” Constitutional Political Economy. 13, 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnellenbach, J. The Evolution of a Fiscal Constitution When Individuals are Theoretically Uncertain. European Journal of Law and Economics 17, 97–115 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026389926709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026389926709

Navigation