Abstract
The naturalistic fallacy is mentionedfrequently by evolutionary psychologists as anerroneous way of thinking about the ethicalimplications of evolved behaviors. However,evolutionary psychologists are themselvesconfused about the naturalistic fallacy and useit inappropriately to forestall legitimateethical discussion. We briefly review what thenaturalistic fallacy is and why it is misusedby evolutionary psychologists. Then we attemptto show how the ethical implications of evolvedbehaviors can be discussed constructivelywithout impeding evolutionary psychologicalresearch. A key is to show how ethicalbehaviors, in addition to unethical behaviors,can evolve by natural selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R.D.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Arnhart, L.: 1998, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds): 1992, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bartlett, J.: 1992, Familiar Quotations: a Collection of Passages, Phrases and Proverbs Traced to Their Sources in Ancient and Modern Literature, 16th edn., Little, Brown, Boston.
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R. and Lycett, J.: 2002, Human Evolutionary Psychology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Boehm, C.: 1999, Hierarchy in the Forest: Egalitarianism and the Evolution of Human Altruism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: 2002, ‘Homo Reciprocans’ Nature 415, 125–128.
Buss, D.: 1990, ‘Evolutionary Social Psychology: Prospects and Pitfalls’ Motivation and Emotion 14, 265–286.
Buss, D.M.: 1999, Evolutionary Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Cartwright, J.: 2000. Evolution and Human Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.: 1988, Homicide, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Darwin, C.: 1871, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Appleton, New York.
Fehr, E. and Gachter, S.: 2002, ‘Altruistic Punishment in Humans’ Nature 415, 137–140.
Fukuyama, F.: 2002, Our Posthuman Future, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.
Gaulin, S.J.C. and McBurney, D.H.: 2001, Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Holmes, O.W.: 1897, ‘The Path of the Law’ Harvard Law Review 10, 457–478.
Hume, D.: 1779, Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford University Press 1968, Oxford.
Hrdy, S.: 1999, Mother Nature, Pantheon, New York.
Moore, G.: 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Richards, J.R.: 2000, Human Nature after Darwin, Routledge, London.
Richards, R.J.: 1986, ‘A Defence of Evolutionary Ethics’ Biology and Philosophy 1, 265–292.
Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1998, Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sober, E.: 1991, Core Questions in Philosophy, MacMillan, New York.
Sober, E.: 1994, From a Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Thornhill, R. and Palmer, C.R.: 2000, A Natural History of Rape, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Williams, B.: 1972, Morality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wilson, D.S.: 1999, ‘A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection’ Biology and Philosophy 14, 431–449.
Wilson, D.S.: 2002, Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Wilson, M. and Daly, M.: 1992, ‘The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel’ in J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 289–326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, D.S., Dietrich, E. & Clark, A.B. On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biology & Philosophy 18, 669–681 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026380825208
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026380825208