Skip to main content
Log in

On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The naturalistic fallacy is mentionedfrequently by evolutionary psychologists as anerroneous way of thinking about the ethicalimplications of evolved behaviors. However,evolutionary psychologists are themselvesconfused about the naturalistic fallacy and useit inappropriately to forestall legitimateethical discussion. We briefly review what thenaturalistic fallacy is and why it is misusedby evolutionary psychologists. Then we attemptto show how the ethical implications of evolvedbehaviors can be discussed constructivelywithout impeding evolutionary psychologicalresearch. A key is to show how ethicalbehaviors, in addition to unethical behaviors,can evolve by natural selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnhart, L.: 1998, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds): 1992, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J.: 1992, Familiar Quotations: a Collection of Passages, Phrases and Proverbs Traced to Their Sources in Ancient and Modern Literature, 16th edn., Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L., Dunbar, R. and Lycett, J.: 2002, Human Evolutionary Psychology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C.: 1999, Hierarchy in the Forest: Egalitarianism and the Evolution of Human Altruism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: 2002, ‘Homo Reciprocans’ Nature 415, 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.: 1990, ‘Evolutionary Social Psychology: Prospects and Pitfalls’ Motivation and Emotion 14, 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M.: 1999, Evolutionary Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, J.: 2000. Evolution and Human Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. and Wilson, M.: 1988, Homicide, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1871, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and Gachter, S.: 2002, ‘Altruistic Punishment in Humans’ Nature 415, 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 2002, Our Posthuman Future, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S.J.C. and McBurney, D.H.: 2001, Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O.W.: 1897, ‘The Path of the Law’ Harvard Law Review 10, 457–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1779, Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford University Press 1968, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S.: 1999, Mother Nature, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.: 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.R.: 2000, Human Nature after Darwin, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.J.: 1986, ‘A Defence of Evolutionary Ethics’ Biology and Philosophy 1, 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1998, Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1991, Core Questions in Philosophy, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1994, From a Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. and Palmer, C.R.: 2000, A Natural History of Rape, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.: 1972, Morality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1999, ‘A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection’ Biology and Philosophy 14, 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 2002, Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. and Daly, M.: 1992, ‘The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel’ in J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 289–326.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, D.S., Dietrich, E. & Clark, A.B. On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biology & Philosophy 18, 669–681 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026380825208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026380825208

Navigation