Skip to main content
Log in

The Gambling Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: An Initial Psychometric Evaluation

  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instruments to assess individuals' self-efficacy for the control of addictive behaviors have been useful for monitoring behavior change, predicting maintenance of treatment gains, and identifying potential relapse situations. The Gambling Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (GSEQ) was developed to assess perceived self-efficacy to control gambling behavior. A demographically diverse sample of 309 adult gamblers completed an initial set of 42 items, of which 16 were selected to form the final version of the GSEQ. The GSEQ showed high internal consistency (α = .96) and good test-retest reliability (r = .86). A factor analysis provided some support for a unitary factor structure. As expected, GSEQ scores were negatively correlated with reports of problematic gambling behavior. Participants experiencing problems related to their gambling behavior scored significantly lower on the GSEQ than those who were not experiencing gambling problems. This psychometric examination of the GSEQ supported its potential utility for treatment planning and outcome evaluation with problem gamblers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allsop, S., Saunders, B., & Phillips, M. (2000). The process of relapse in severely dependent male problem drinkers. Addiction, 95, 95-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annis, H. M., & Davis, C. S. (1988). Self-efficacy and the prevention of alcoholic relapse: Initial findings from a treatment trial. In T. B. Baker & D. Cannon (Eds.), Addictive disorders: Psychological research on assessment and treatment (pp. 88-112). New York: Praeger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annis, H. M., & Graham, J. M. (1988). Situational Confidence Questionnaire (SCQ) user's guide. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. S., Holt, C. S. & Lichtenstein, E. (1986). Self efficacy and smoking reexamined: construct validity and clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 846-852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. S. & Lichtenstein, E. (1988). Cognitive assessment. In D. M. Donovan & G. A. Marlatt (Eds.) Assessment of addictive behaviors (pp. 189-213). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., Dunalo, V., & Lange, M. (1997). How much do you spend gambling? Ambiguities in survey questionnaire items. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 237-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. C. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coletti, G., Supnick, J. A., & Payne T. J. (1985). The Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ): Preliminary scale development and validation. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 249-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condiotte, M. M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1981). Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 648-658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, C. C. (1981). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation maintenance: A preliminary report. Cognitive Research and Therapy, 5, 175-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Self-efficacy and the addictive behaviors. [Special issue: Self-efficacy theory in contemporary psychology]. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 302-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, C. C., Fairhurst, S. K., & Piotrowski, N. A. (1995). Self-efficacy and addictive behaviors. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory research, and application (pp. 109-138). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. F., Hufford, M. R., Vagge, L. M., Muenz, L. R., Costello, M. E., & Weiss, R. D. (2000). The relationship of self-efficacy expectancies to relapse among alcohol dependent men and women: a prospective study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 345-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W., & Mosteller, F. (1979). Representative sampling: II: Scientific literature, excluding statistics. International Statistical Review, 47, 111-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Situational determinants of relapse and skill-training interventions. In G. A. Marlatt & J. R. Gordon (Eds.), Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors (pp. 71-127). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. O., Lichtenstein, E., & Mermelstein, R. J. (1983). Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 5, 632-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Opinion Research Center. (1999). Overview of national survey and community database research on gambling behavior: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, P. W. (1987). Cognitive correlates of bulimia: The Bulimic Thoughts Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 593-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, F., & Waltzl, H. (1983). Self-assessment of relapse risk and assertiveness in relation to treatment outcome of female alcoholics. Addictive Behaviors, 8, 121-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounds-Bryant, J. L., Flynn, P. M., & Craighead, L. W. (1997). Relationship between self-efficacy perceptions and in-treatment drug use among regular cocaine users. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 383-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & VanderBilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., Scanlan, K. M., & Cummings, T. N. (1994). Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts Gambling Screen (MAGS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 339-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (1993). Problem Drinkers: Guided self-change treatment. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 65, 727-732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symes, B. A., & Nicki, R. M. (1997). A preliminary consideration of cue-exposure, response-prevention treatment for pathological gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 145-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. (1997). Gambling and problem gambling in Mississippi: A report to the Mississippi Council on Compulsive Gambling. Hattiesburg, MS: Social Science Research Center of Mississippi State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

May, R.K., Whelan, J.P., Steenbergh, T.A. et al. The Gambling Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: An Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Gambl Stud 19, 339–357 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026379125116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026379125116

Navigation