Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 395–418 | Cite as

Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience

  • Elizabeth Shove


Many commentators analyse green consumption as if it were an expression of individual environmental commitment. Such approaches suppose that the adoption of more sustainable ways of life depends upon the diffusion of "green" beliefs and actions through society. In this article, the author explores the idea that patterns of resource consumption (especially of energy and water) reflect what are generally inconspicuous routines and habits. Are such conventions evolving or standardising in ways that are increasingly resource intensive? In addressing this question with reference to three domains of daily life: comfort, cleanliness, and convenience, four simple models of change are outlined, two of which imply an inexorable escalation of resource consumption, two of which do not. The purpose of this illustrative exercise is to demonstrate the importance of understanding the systemic redefinition of "normal practice." Rather than taking individual behaviour to be the central unit of analysis, the case is made for an approach that concentrates on the construction and transformation of collective convention. This theoretical reorientation opens the way for programmes of research and policy informed by an appreciation of the technological and the commercial as well as the symbolic and cultural dimensions of more and less resource-intensive ways of life.


Simple Model Economic Policy Individual Behaviour Resource Consumption Cultural Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albaum, M. (1997). Das Kundenbuch. Menschen und ihr Einkaufsverhalten bei Bekleidung. Frankfurt/Main: Deutscher Fachverlag.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. (Ed.) (1990). Concise Oxford dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biermeyer, P. (2001). Coming changes in the U.S. clothes washer market. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  4. Bijker, W. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bode, M. (2000). Clothing care function: Germany, SusHouse Project final report. Delft: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology Policy and Management.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of judgement and taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brager, G., & de Dear, R. (2000). A standard for natural ventilation. ASHRAE Journal, October, pp. 21-27.Google Scholar
  8. Consumers Union (1950). Washing machines. Consumer Reports, June, pp. 258-263.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, G. (1998). Air conditioning America: Engineers and the controlled environment, 1900–1960. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Crowley, J. (2001). The invention of comfort. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. DEFRA (1999). Tumble dryers in the UK. Reference Number: wttd4031; Issue Date: 11 November, 1999. Available at: (01.05.02).Google Scholar
  13. DEFRA (2000). Washing machines in the United Kingdom: A sector review paper on projected energy consumption for the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. WTWM4031, October 2000. Available at: http://www.mtprog. com/wet/wash_mach/wtwmdown4031.pdf (14.4.02).Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, M. (1984). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Environment Agency (2001). Environment information. Available at: http://www. (14.04.02).Google Scholar
  16. Fanger, O. (1970). Thermal comfort-Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fine, B., & Leopold, E. (1993). The world of consumption. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, C. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Forty, A. (1986). Objects of desire: Design and society since 1750. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  20. Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (1998). The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis. European Sociological Review, 14, 69-85.Google Scholar
  21. Handley, S. (1999). Nylon: The manmade fashion revolution. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  22. Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Humphreys, M. (1995). Thermal comfort temperatures and the habits of Hobbits. In: F. Nicol, M. Humphreys, O. Sykes, & S. Roaf (Eds), Standards for thermal comfort, pp. 3-14. London: E & F N Spon.Google Scholar
  25. Kaufmann, J. C. (1998). Dirty linen: Couples and their laundry. London: Middlesex University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Leete, L., & Schor, J. (1994). Assessing the time-squeeze hypothesis: Hours worked in the United States 1969–1989. Industrial Relations, 33, 25-43.Google Scholar
  27. Lupton, E., & Miller, J. (1992). The bathroom, the kitchen and the aesthetics of waste: A process of elimination. New York: Kiosk.Google Scholar
  28. Parr, J. (1999). Domestic goods: The material, the moral, and the economic in the postwar years. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  29. Plumbing and Mechanical (1994). The stand-up bath. Available at: http://www. (12.04.02).Google Scholar
  30. Rip, A., & Groen, A. (2001). Many visible hands. In: R. Coombs, K. Green, V. Walsh, & A. Richards (Eds.), Technology and the market: Demands, users and innovation, pp. 12-37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In: S. Rayner & E. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: Resources and technology, Volume 2, pp. 327-392. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways that Americans use their time. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sams, P. (2001). Clothes care-Sending the right signals. Paper given at the International Appliance Technical Conference, Columbus, Ohio, March 27.Google Scholar
  34. Schor, J. (1992). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  36. Schot, J., Hoogma, R., & Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system. Futures, 26, 1060-1076.Google Scholar
  37. Southerton, D. (2001). Squeezing time: Allocating practices, co-ordinating networks and scheduling society. Time & Society, 12, 5-25.Google Scholar
  38. Southerton, D., Shove, E., & Warde, A. (2001). Harried and hurried: Time shortage and co-ordination of everyday life. Manchester: The University of Manchester and UMIST. CRIC Discussion Paper No. 47.Google Scholar
  39. Spaargaren, G. (1997). The ecological modernisation of production and consumption: Essays in environmental sociology. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Landbouw Universitiet Wageningen.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, C. (1996). Caring consumers: Gendered consumption meanings and the juggling lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 388-407.Google Scholar
  41. Vigarello, G. (1998). Concepts of cleanliness: Changing attitudes in France since the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Warde, A. (1999). Convenient food: Space and timing. British Food Journal, 101, 518-527.Google Scholar
  43. Warde, A., Shove, E., & Southerton, D. (1998). Convenience, schedules and sustainability. Paper given at the European Science Foundation Workshop on Consumption, Everyday Life and Sustainability, Lancaster University, 27–29 March. Available at Scholar
  44. Yorkshire Water (2001). Latest news. Ref: NR105/2001. Date 18.05.01. (accessed on 01.05.02).Google Scholar
  45. Zerubavel, E. (1979). Patterns of time in hospital life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Zerubavel, E. (1985). The seven day circle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Shove
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Cartmel CollegeLancaster UniversityLancasterU.K. E-mail

Personalised recommendations