Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 379–400 | Cite as

When Will a Victim Be Secondarily Victimized? The Effect of Observer's Belief in a Just World, Victim's Innocence and Persistence of Suffering

  • Isabel Correia
  • Jorge Vala
Article

Abstract

According to the belief in a just world (BJW) theory, the most threatening victim for the observers' BJW is the innocent victim whose suffering persists. Consequently the innocent victim whose suffering persists should be more secondarily victimized by high-BJW participants than by low-BJW participants. However, research has never systematically tested this basic prediction of the theory. In these two studies we tried to determine the impact of the observer's BJW, the victim's innocence, and the persistence of the victim's suffering on secondary victimization. In study 1, an interaction between BJW and victim's innocence was found on the attractiveness of the victim. In study 2, an interaction between BJW, victim's innocence, and persistence of suffering was found on the derogation of the victim.

belief in a just world victim's innocence justice secondary victimization persistence of suffering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ambrosio, A. L., and Sheehan, E. P. (1991). The just world belief and the AIDS epidemic. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 6: 163-170.Google Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Wyer, R. S., and Srull, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 3, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1-40.Google Scholar
  3. Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V. C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohen, E., and Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. Am. Psychol. 37: 368-384.Google Scholar
  4. Cabral, M.V., Vala, J., and Freire, A. (2000). Orientações perante as desigualdades sociais, ICS, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
  5. Cadwell, S. (1991). Twice removed: The stigma suffered by gay men with AIDS. Special issue: Men & men's issues in social work theory & practice. Smith Coll. Stud. Soc. Work 61: 236-246.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S., and Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol. Bull. 98: 310-357.Google Scholar
  7. Comby, L., Devos, T., and Deschamps, J. C. (1995). Croyance en un monde juste: Responsabilités comportamentale et morale attribuées aux personnes séropositives. Rev. Int. Psychol. Soc. 2: 83-106.Google Scholar
  8. Correia, I. F. (2001). Concertos e desconcertos na procura de um mundo concertado: Crença no mundo justo, inocência da vítima e vitimização secundária, PhD Dissertation on Social and Organizational Psychology, ISCTE, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
  9. Correia, I., Vala, J., and Aguiar, P. (2001). The effects of BJW and victim's innocence on secondary victimization, judgements of justice and victim's deservingness. Soc. Justice Res. 14: 327-342.Google Scholar
  10. Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Soc. Justice Res. 12: 79-98.Google Scholar
  11. Dalbert, C. (2001). The Justice Motive as a Personal Resource. Dealing With Challenges and Critical Life Events. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Dalbert, C., Montada, L., and Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier skalen. Psychol. Beitrage 29: 596-615.Google Scholar
  13. Gaertner, S. L., and McLaughlin, J. P. (1983). Racial stereotypes: Associations and ascriptions of positive and negative characteristics. Soc. Psychol. Q. 46: 23-30.Google Scholar
  14. Hafer, C. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26: 1059-1073.Google Scholar
  15. Kieselbach, T. (1997). Unemployment, victimization, and perceived injustices: Future perspectives for coping with occupational transitions. Soc. Justice Res. 10: 127-151.Google Scholar
  16. Kleinke, C. L., and Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychol. Women Q., 14: 343-353.Google Scholar
  17. Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Soc. Justice Res. 1: 107-125.Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about justice. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 247-270.Google Scholar
  20. Lerner, M. J., and Goldberg, J. H. (1999). When do decent people blame victims?: The differing effects of the explicit/rational and implicit/experiential cognitive systems. In Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. (eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203-210.Google Scholar
  22. Lipkus, I. M. (1992). A heuristic model to explain perceptions of unjust events. Soc. Justice Res. 5: 359-384.Google Scholar
  23. Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., and Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22: 666-677.Google Scholar
  24. Maes, J. (1994). Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice? Soc. Justice Res. 7: 69-90.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, D. T. (1977). Altruism and threat to a belief in a just world. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 113-126.Google Scholar
  26. Mohiyeddini, C., and Montada, L. (1998). BJW and self-efficacy in coping with observed victimization: Results from a study about unemployment. In Montada, L. and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 41-54.Google Scholar
  27. Montada, L. (1998). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and self-interest? In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 217-246.Google Scholar
  28. Mummendey, A., Simon, B., Dietze, C., Grunert, M., Haeger, G., Kessler, S., Lettgen, S., and Schaferhoff, S. (1992). Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28: 125-144.Google Scholar
  29. Nishimura, H., and Takahashi, Y. (1988). A study on victimization and its correlates among the aged: I. Various aspects of victimization and the vulnerability of victims to harms. Rep. Nat. Res. Inst. Police Sci. 29: 44-61.Google Scholar
  30. Penfold, P. S. (1992). Sexual abuse by therapists: Maintaining the conspiracy of silence. Can. J. Commun. Ment. Health 11: 5-15.Google Scholar
  31. Peters, G., and Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive—negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. In Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, W. (eds), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 33-60.Google Scholar
  32. Pettigrew, T. F., and Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 25: 57-75.Google Scholar
  33. Reichle, B., Schneider, A., and Montada, L. (1998). How do observers of victimization preserve their belief in a just world cognitively or actionally? Findings from a longitudinal study. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 55-64.Google Scholar
  34. Rosewater, L. B. (1993). Counseling battered women. Special issue: Psychotherapy with women from a feminist perspective. J. Train. Pract. Prof. Psychol. 7: 67-80.Google Scholar
  35. Ross, L. T., Lutz, C. J., and Lakey, B. (1999). Perceived social support and attributions for failed support. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 896-909.Google Scholar
  36. Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? J. Soc. Issues 31: 65-89.Google Scholar
  37. Simmons, C. W., and Pilliavin, J. A. (1972). Effects of deception on reactions to a victim. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21: 56-60.Google Scholar
  38. Stahly, G. B. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of the stigma of cancer: An overview. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 6: 3-27.Google Scholar
  39. Walton, E. (1994). The Confrontation Clause and the child victim of sexual abuse. Child Adolesc. Soc. Work J. 11: 195-207.Google Scholar
  40. Weiner, B., Perry, R., and Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 55: 738-748.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISCTE – Departamento de Psicologia Social e das OrganizaçõesLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations