Skip to main content
Log in

Failure of the Quasiparticle Picture of X-ray Absorption?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Golden rule expression for x-ray absorption spectra (XAS) is typically calculated within a one-particle (quasiparticle) approximation and generally leads to good agreement between theory and experiment. The fact that a quasiparticle approximation works fairly well is surprising, since it neglects satellite excitations and intrinsic losses due to a suddenly created core-hole. The resolution of this paradox requires physics beyond the independent particle approximation. This is discussed here using an effective Green's function formulation based on a quasi-boson model that takes interference between inelastic losses into account. This approach shows that inelastic excitations such as multi-electron excitations tend to be suppressed, and that the XAS is given by a broadened quasiparticle particle approximation, together with weak satellite structure and edge singularity effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. J. Rehr and R. C. Albers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4927(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. Soininen and E. L. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B 64, 165112(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Bardyszewski and L. Hedin, Phys. Scripta 32, 439(1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. W. Campbell, L. Hedin, J. J. Rehr, and W. Bardyszewski, Phys. Rev. B 65, 064107(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. Lee and J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. B 11, 2795(1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. U. von Barth and G. Grossmann, Phys. Rev. B 25, 5150(1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. J. Rehr, E. A. Stern, R. L. Martin, and E. R. Davidson, Phys. Rev. B 17, 560(1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. L. Schaich, Phys. Rev. B 8, 4028(1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Muller, O. Jepsen, and J. W. Wilkins, Solid State Comm. 42, 365(1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, P. Sorantin, and S. B. Trickey, Comput. Phys. Commun. 59, 399(1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. J. Durham, J. B. Pendry, and C. H. Hodges, Comput. Phys. Commun. 25, 193(1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Ebert, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1665(1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. L. Ankudinov, J. J. Rehr, and S. I. Zabinsky, Comput. Phys. Commun. 98, 359(1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. E. Inglesfield, Solid State Commun. 40, 467; J. Phys. C 16, 403(1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Hedin and S. Lundqvist, Solid State Physics, F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehrenreich, eds. (Academic, New York, 1969), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Hedin, J. Michiels, and J. E. Inglesfield, Phys. Rev. B 58, 15565(1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rehr, J.J. Failure of the Quasiparticle Picture of X-ray Absorption?. Foundations of Physics 33, 1735–1742 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026277520940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026277520940

Navigation