Abstract
The conservation of energy is necessary for accuracy oflong-term simulations, and also guarantees energystability, which is sought to alleviate any stabilityrestrictions on the time integration step size. We discusssome issues regarding the integration of stiff nonlineardynamics with traditional dissipative and energy andmomentum conserving methods and we introduce a new 2-stagemethod which is an adaptation of the time integrationscheme presented in [1] for rigid multibody dynamics. Bycombining an energy conserving scheme with a substageacceleration filter, we devise an implicit method thatpreserves the energy map and is capable of integratingstiff flexible multibody systems that require numericaldissipation. In order to avoid the artificial stiffnessand the resulting instabilities caused by the enforcementof kinematic constraints, a joint coordinate formulationis adopted to model the rigid components of the system,while a total Lagrangian approach is adopted to model theflexible elements in the system. As the resulting model istypically characterized by a large number of degrees offreedom, we also demonstrate how the method may beextended to incorporate a form of domain decomposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, S., Tortorelli, D.A. and Hansen, J.M., ‘Unconditionally energy stable implicit time integration: Application to multibody system analysis and design’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 48, 2000, 791–822.
Thomsen, J.J., ‘Nonlinear dynamic interactions: Tools, examples, cases’, Technical Report, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark, 1997.
Kuhl, D. and Crisfield, M.A., ‘Energy-conserving and decaying algorithms in non-linear structural dynamics’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 45, 1999, 569–599.
Chen, S., ‘Analysis and design of nonlinearly constrained dynamic systems’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000.
Crisfield, M.A., Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Volume 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991.
Simo, J.C., Tarnow, N. and Wong, K., ‘Exact energy-momentum conserving algorithms and symplectic schemes for nonlinear dynamics’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 100, 1992, 63–116.
Stander, N. and Stein, E., ‘An energy-conserving planar finite beam element for dynamics of flexible mechanisms’, Engineering Computations 6, 1996, 60–85.
Gonzalez, O. and Simo, J.C., ‘On the stability of symplectic and energy-momentum algorithms for nonlinear hamiltonian systems with symmetry’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 134, 1996, 197–222.
Cardona, A. and Geradin, M., ‘Time integration of the equations of motion in mechanism analysis’, Computers & Structures 33, 1989, 801–820.
Kuhl, D. and Ramm, E., ‘Conservation of energy and momentum for implicit single step time integration schemes’, in Structural Dynamics — EURODYN'96, Borri and Spinelli Augusti (eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam, 1996, 349–456
Gonzalez, O., ‘Mechanical systems subject to holonomic constraints: Differential-algebraic formulations and conservative integration’, Physica D 132, 1999, 165–174.
Betsch, P. and Steinmann, P., ‘Conservation properties of a time fe method — Part II: Timestepping schemes for non-linear elastodynamics’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 50, 2001, 1931–1955.
Farhat, C. and Roux, F.-X., ‘A method of finite element tearing and interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 32, 1991, 1205–1227.
Farhat, C., Chen, P.-S. and Mandel, J., ‘A scalable lagrange multiplier based domain decomposition method for time-dependent problems’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 38, 1995, 3831–3853.
Fish, J., Belsky, V. and Pandheeradi, M., ‘Iterative and direct solvers for interface problems with Lagrange multipliers’, Computing Systems in Engineering 6(3), 1995, 261–273.
Nikravesh, P.E. and Gim, G., ‘Systematic construction of the equations of motion for multibody systems containing closed kinematic loops’, Advances in Design Automation 3, 1989, 27–33.
Hughes, T.J.R., Caughey, T.K. and Liu, W.K., ‘Finite-element methods for nonlinear elastodynamics which conserve energy’, Journal of Applied Mechanics 45, 1978, 366–370.
Hairer, E. and Wanner, G., Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
Geradin, M., ‘Automatic step size control during time integration of constrained systems’, Technical Report, International Graduate School in Applied Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 1997.
Goodwin, G.C. and Sin, K.S., Adaptive Filtering: Prediction and Control, Academic Press, New York, 1992.
Farhat, C., Crivelli, L. and Geradin, M., Implicit time integration of a class of constrained hybrid formulations — Part I: Spectral stability theory', Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 125, 1995, 71–107.
Ciarlet, P.G., Mathematical Elasticity, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Tortorelli, D.A. An Energy-Conserving and Filtering Method for Stiff Nonlinear Multibody Dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics 10, 341–362 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026237902561
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026237902561