Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Binary Data: An Application to the Intergroup Prisoner's Dilemma Game
- 79 Downloads
The intergroup prisoner's dilemma game was suggested by Bornstein (1992, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 7, 597–606) for modelling intergroup conflicts over continuous public goods. We analyse data of an experiment in which the game was played for 150 rounds, under three matching conditions. The objective is to study differences in the investment patterns of players in the different groups. A repeated measures analysis was conducted by Goren and Bornstein (1999, Games and Human Behaviour: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport, pp. 299–314), involving data aggregation and strong distributional assumptions. Here we introduce a nonparametric approach based on permutation tests. Two new measures, the cumulative investment and the normalised cumulative investment, provide additional insight into the differences between groups. The proposed tests are based on the area under the investment curves. They identify an overall difference between the groups as well as pairwise differences. A simultaneous confidence band for the mean difference curve is used to detect the games which account for any pairwise difference.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bornstein, G. (1992). “The Free Rider Problem in Intergroup Conflicts Over Step-Level and Continuous Public Goods.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.7, 597–606.Google Scholar
- Cox, D.R. and Snell, E.J. (1989). Analysis of Binary Data. 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, L. and Steffens, F.E. (1996). “The Use of Permutation Techniques in Evaluating the Outcome of a Randomised Storm Seeding Experiment.” Journal of Applied Meteorology. 35, 1546–1550.Google Scholar
- Good, P. (1995). Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypothesis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Goren, H. and Bornstein, G. (1999). “Reciprocation and Learning in the Intergroup Prisoners' Dilemma (IPD) Game.” In D. Budescu, I. Erev, and R. Zwick (eds.), Games and Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 299–314.Google Scholar
- Hand, D. and Crowder, N. (1996). Practical Longitudinal Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, P.E. (1995). “Randomization Tests in Econometrics.” Journal of Business and Econometric Statistics. 13, 85–94.Google Scholar
- Koziol, J.A., Maxwell, D.A., Fukushima, M., Colmerauer, M.E.M., and Pilch, Y.H. (1981). “A Distribution-Free Test for Tumor Growth Curve Analyses with Application to an Animal Tumor Immunotherapy Experiment.” Biometrics. 37, 383–390.Google Scholar
- Nirel, R. and Gorfine, M. (2000). “Analysing Data of Intergroup Prisoner's Dilemma Game.” Discussion paper No. 214. Jerusalem, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
- Switzer, P. (1974). “Confidence Sets for a Shift Parameter Derived from Fisher's Two-Sample Permutation Test.” Technical report no. 67. Stanford, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Venkatraman, E.S. and Begg, C.B. (1996). “A Distribution-Free Procedure for Comparing Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves From a Paired Experiment.” Biometrika. 83, 835–848.Google Scholar
- Zerbe, G.O. and Walker, S.H. (1977). “A Randomization Tests for Comparison of Groups of Growth Curves with Different Polynomial Design Matrices.” Biometrics. 33, 653–657.Google Scholar