Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual Indicators of Environmental Health, Future Land Use, and Stewardship

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are important linkages between the health of humans and theenvironment, restoration of degraded lands, and long-term stewardship of public lands, yet most environmental indicators deal only with assessing the physical and biological aspects ofecosystems. In this article, we examine the ratings of perceptionsof several environmental problems for their utility as indicatorsof environmental quality, and examine perceptions of future land use by people interviewed in Santa Fe, New Mexico, near the Department of Energy's (DOE) Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Overall, people with lower incomes rated environmental problems as more severe than others, were more willing to spend federal funds to solve them, and were consistent in their ratingsof severity of environmental problems and their willingness to spend federal funds. Cleaning up LANL and other Department of Energy sites, received the highest rating for expenditure of federal funds. The highest rated future uses for DOE sites were for recreation and for National Environmental Research Parks. People with less education generally gave higher ratings to mostfuture land uses for DOE than did those with more education. However, those with higher education gave higher ratings to nuclear reprocessing, and nuclear material storage. Where there were differences, the people interviewed at Santa Fe rated all environmental problems (except pesticides) as more severe than did those previously interviewed in Albuquerque (located fartherfrom the LANL site), and they were more willing to spend federalfunds on these problems. Ratings for all future land uses did notdiffer between the Santa Fe and Albuquerque respondents. These perception-based indicators show general agreement among peopleliving close and farther away from LANL with respect to cleaningup LANL and the future land uses for the site. These indicators should be considered by regulators, site personnel, and policy makers in future management and land use decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binney, S. E., Mason, R., Martsolf, S. and Detweiler, J. H.: 1996, 'Credibility, public trust, and the transport of radioactive waste through local communities', Environ. Behav. 28, 283-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiko, P, Morrill, R. L., Flynn, J., Faustman, E. M., VanBelle, G. and Omenn, G.: 1996, 'Who holds the stakes? A case study of stakeholder identification at two nuclear weapons production sites', Risk Anal. 16, 237-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.: 1998, 'Environmental attitudes and perceptions of future land use at the Savannah River Site: Are there racial differences?', J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 53, 255-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.: 1999, 'American Indians, hunting and fishing rates, risk, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory', Environ. Res. 80, 317-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.: 2000a, 'Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: Long-term stewardship at the Department of Energy', Environ. Manage. 26, 469-478

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.: 2000b, 'Recreation and risk around Los Alamos: Are Hispanics more at risk?', J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 61, 265-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Sanchez, J., Gibbons, J. W. and Gochfeld, M.: 1997, 'Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen', Risk Anal. 17, 313-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Stephens, W., Boring, S., Kuklinski, J., Gibbons, J. W. and Gochfeld, M.: 1999a, 'Ethnicity and risk: Fishing and consumption in people fishing along the Savannah River', Risk Anal. 19, 421-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Kirk Pflugh, K., Lurig, L., Von Hagen, L. A. and Von Hagen, S.: 1999b, 'Fishing in urban New Jersey: Ethnicity affects information sources, perception, and compliance', Risk Anal. 19, 217-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Roush, D. E., Ramos, R. and Gochfeld, M.: 2000a, 'Risk perception, land use, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: Attitudes of the Shoshone-Bannock and other American Indians', Environ. Res. 83, 298-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J, Roush Jr., D. E., Sanchez, J., Ondrof, J., Ramos, R., McMahon, J. and Gochfeld, M.: 2000b, 'Attitudes and perceptions about ecological resources, hazards, and future land use of people living near the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory', Environ. Monitor. Assess. 60, 145-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Myers, O., Boring, C. S., Dixon, C., Leonard, J., Lord, C., McMahon, M., Ramos, R., Shukla, S. and Gochfeld, M.: 'Perceptions of environmental problems and concerns regarding the Los Alamos National Laboratory: Hispanics are more concerned than whites attending a gun show', Environ. Manage. (in press.)

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1994, National Environmental Research Parks, Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1995, Environmental Management 1995, Department of Energy (DOE/EM 0228), Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1996a, Charting the Course: The Future Use Report, Department of Energy (DOE/EM-0283), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1996b, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory: Comprehensive Facility and Land Use Plan, Department of Energy (DOE/EM-0283), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1999a, From Cleanup to Stewardship, Department of Energy (DOE/EM-0466), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1999b, Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Department of Energy (DOE/EIS-0238), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Stern, P. C. and Guagnano, G. A.: 1998, 'Social structure and social psychological bases of environmental concern', Environ. Behav. 30, 450-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A.: 1978, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L. E., Watkins, S., Kadermann, R., Levin, B., Ayyar, D. R., Bizzio, M., Stephens, D. and Bean, J. A.: 1995, 'Mercury exposure in humans through food consumption from the Everglades of Florida', Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 80, 41-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J. H. and Oishi, S. M.: 1995, 'How to Conduct Interviews by Telephone and in Person, Vol. 4 of The Survey Kit, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. G. and Harper, B. L.: 1998, 'Native American exposure scenarios and a tribal risk model', Risk Anal. 17, 789-795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenni, K. I., Merkhofer, M. W. and Williams, C.: 1995, 'The rise and fall of a risk-based priority system: Lessons from DOE's environmental restoration priority system', Risk Anal. 15, 397-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL): 1999, Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Management Plan: Overview, Department of Energy (LALP-98/112), Los Alamos, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linthurst, R. A., Bourdeau, P. and Tardiff, R. G.: 1995, Methods to Assess the Effects of Chemicals on Ecosystems, Wiley & Sons, Chicester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, K. and Greenberg, M.: 2000, The Meaning of Stewardship: Implications for DOE Long-term Stewardship Planning, Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, Social and Economic Center, Rutgers Univ. Unpubl., pp. 1-24.

  • Lynn, F. M. and Busenberg, J. J.: 1995, 'Citizen advisory committees and environmental policy: What we know, what's left to discover', Risk Anal. 15, 147-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1994, Building Consensus Through Risk Assessment and Management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1995, Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE's Environmental Management Program, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 2000, Long-term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • President's Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management: 1997, Report of the Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, U.S. Congress: Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute: 1995, User's Guide to SAS, SAS Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth Jr., J. F. and Brown, R. B.: 1997, 'Racial and gender meanings of why people participate in recreational fishing', Leisure Sci. 19, 129-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. L., Brown, S., Greenberg, M. and Kahn, M. A.: 1999, 'Risk perception in context: The Savannah River Site stakeholder study', Risk Anal. 19, 1019-1035.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Burger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burger, J., Myers, O., Boring, C.S. et al. Perceptual Indicators of Environmental Health, Future Land Use, and Stewardship. Environ Monit Assess 89, 285–303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026151432175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026151432175

Navigation