Abstract
Participatory plant breeding (PPB) methods were used to develop two farmer-accepted, cold-tolerant rice varieties in Nepal — Machhapuchhre-3 (M-3) and Machhapuchhre-9 (M-9). Both were derived from the cross Fuji 102/Chhomrong Dhan. Following the introduction of these varieties, the changes in the rice landraces and varieties that farmers grew were studied in ten villages. In seven of them for which data were analysed for both 1996 and 1999, adopting farmers grew 18 landraces and four modern varieties of which three, M-3, M-9 and Lumle-2, were the products of PPB. These three varieties covered 10% of the total rice area and 33% of the rice area of the adopting farmers in the seven study villages in the 1999 survey. The adoption of the PPB varieties impacted most on the more commonly grown landraces. With the exception of two villages, the varietal richness among adopting farmers was either static or increased, and there was an overall increase in allelic diversity. However, in future, the increasing adoption of M-3 and M-9 could result in significant reductions in varietal richness, although, allelic diversity may not be greatly reduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellon, M.R. & S.B. Brush, 1994. Keepers of maize in Chiapas. Econ Bot 48: 196-209.
Brush, S., 1995. In situ conservation of landraces in centres of crop diversity. Crop Sci 35: 346-354.
Chemjong, P.B., B.H. Baral, K.C. Thakuri, P.R. Neupane, R.K. Neupane & M.P. Upadhaya, 1995. The impact of Pakhribas Agricultural Centre research in the Eastern Hills of Nepal: Farmer adoption of nine agricultural technologies. Pakhribas Agricultural Centre, Dhankuta, Nepal.
Cromwell, E. & C. Almekinders, 2000. The impact of seed supply interventions on the use of crop genetic diversity. In: C. Almekinders & W. De Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity, pp. 223-226. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
Frankel, O.H., A.H.D. Brown & J.J. Burdon, 1995. The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain, pp. 299.
Gupta, S.R., M.P. Upadhaya & T. Katsumoto, 1996. Status of Plant Genetic Resources in Nepal. Paper presented at the 19th summer crops workshop, held at National Rice Research Programme, Parwanipur, Bara, Nepal, 27-29 February 1995. Parwanipur, Nepal: National Rice Research Programme.
IPGRI, 1996. Proceedings of the IDRC/IPGRI Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 28-30 July, International Agricultural Research Centre, Wageningen. P. Eyzaguirre & M. Iwanaga (Eds.), IPGRI, Rome, Italy.
Joshi, K.D., B.R. Sthapit, R.B. Gurung, M.P. Gurung & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Proposal for release of rice variety Machhapuchre-3. Lumle Agricultural Research Centre, Kaski, Nepal.
Joshi, K.D., D.K. Rijal, R.B. Rana, S.P. Khatiwada, P. Chaudhary, K.P. Shrestha, A. Mudawari, A. Subedi & B.R. Sthapit, 1999.Adding benefits I. Through participatory plant breeding (PPB), seed networks and grassroots strengthening. In: D. Jarvis, B. Sthapit & L. Sears (Eds.), Conserving Agricultural Biodiversity In Situ: A Scientific Basis for Sustainable Agriculture. Proc 3rd Global Meeting of in situ Crop Conservation Project, 5-12 July 1999, Pokhara, Nepal.
Joshi, K.D., B.R. Sthapit & J.R. Witcombe, 2001. How narrowly adapted are the products of decentralised breeding? The spread of rice varieties from participatory plant breeding programme in Nepal. Euphytica 122: 589-597.
LARC, 1995. The adoption and diffusion and incremental bene-fits of fifteen technologies for crops, horticulture, livestock and forestry in the Western Hills of Nepal. LARC Occasional Paper 95/1. Lumle Agricultural Research Centre, Pokhara, Nepal.
Lohar, D.P. & R.B. Rana, 1998. The dichotomy of crop diversity management issues in subsistence and commercial hill farming systems in Nepal. In: Tej Pratap & B. Sthapit (Eds.), Managing Agrobiodiversity-Farmers' Changing Perspectives and Institutional Responses in the Hindu-Kush-Himalayan Region, pp. 183-197. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) Rome.
Smale, M., P.W. Heisey & M.D. Leather, 1995. Maize of the ancestors and modern varieties: the microeconomics of high yielding variety adoption in Malawi. Econ Devel Cult Change 43: 351-368.
Sthapit, B.R., K.D. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. III. Participatory plant breeding, A case study for high altitude rice in Nepal. Expl Agric 32: 479-496.
Weltzein, E., M. Smith, L.S. Meitzner & L. Sperling, 2000. Technical issues in participatory plant breeding from the perspective of formal plant breeding. A global analysis of issues, results and current experiences. Working Document no. 3. CGIAR, Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.
Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R., Sthapit, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I.Methods for varietal selection and breeding and their impact on biodiversity. Expl Agric 32: 453-468.
Witcombe, J.R., 2001. The impact of decentralised and participatory plant breeding on the genetic base of crops. In: H.D. Cooper, C. Spillane & T. Hodgkin (Eds.), Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production, pp. 407-417. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, K., Witcombe, J. The impact of participatory plant breeding (PPB) on landrace diversity: A case study for high-altitude rice in Nepal. Euphytica 134, 117–125 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026151017274
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026151017274