Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 61–71 | Cite as

Propagation of trembling aspen and hybrid poplar for agroforestry: potential benefits of elevated CO2 in the greenhouse

  • Kendall A. Tupker
  • Barb R. ThomasEmail author
  • S. Ellen Macdonald


We examined the usefulness of elevated CO2 in the greenhouse to aid in early selection of genotypes and in the propagation of Populus tremuloides Michaux (aspen) and hybrid poplars for agroforestry, afforestation, or reclamation. Growth in elevated (800 ppm) vs ambient (375 ppm) CO2 for 95 days resulted in greater height (14%), stem caliper (16%), overall biomass, and proportional allocation of biomass to roots as well as elevated net assimilation and water-use-efficiency. Aspen clones selected for superior growth (based on phenotypic selection) broke bud significantly earlier than unselected clones under both CO2 levels; superior clones were also taller with greater stem caliper under both CO2 treatments (but not significant). Under ambient CO2 male aspen were taller than females while under elevated CO2 female aspen were taller than males and also had greater caliper (but not significant). Hybrid poplar grown under elevated (vs ambient) CO2 broke bud significantly earlier and had significantly greater net assimilation and water-use efficiency; they were also taller with greater caliper (but not significant). Differences in performance among the eight hybrid clones were enhanced by growth under elevated CO2. Under ambient CO2, P38P38 was the clone that broke bud earliest, was tallest with greater caliper and had a lower shoot:root biomass ratio. Sargentii, on the other hand, was the shortest with the smallest caliper. The implications of these results need to be considered in the context of using aspen and hybrid poplar for large-scale agroforestry, afforestation and reclamation across Canada.

Ambient CO2 Biomass Gas exchange Phenotypic selection Superior clone 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bourdeau P.F. 1958. Photosynthetic and respiratory rates in leaves of male and female quaking aspen. Forest Science 4: 331-334Google Scholar
  2. Brown K.R. and van den Driessche R. 2002. Growth and nutrition of hybrid poplars over 3 years after fertilization at planting. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 226-232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cantin D., Tremblay M.F., Lechowicz M.J. and Potvin C. 1997. Effects of CO2 enrichment, elevated temperature, and nitrogen availability on the growth and gas exchange of different families of jack pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 510-520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceulemans R., Jiang X.N. and Shao B.Y. 1995. Growth and physi-ology of one-year old poplar _Populus_ under elevated atmo-spheric CO2 levels. Ann. Bot. 75: 609-617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceulemans W. and Mousseau M. 1994. Effects of elevated atmo-spheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytol. 127: 425-446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceulemans R., Shao B.Y., Jiang X.N. and Kalina J. 1996. First-and second-year aboveground growth and productivity of two Popu-lus hybrids grown at ambient and elevated CO2. Tree Physiol. 16: 61-68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis P.S. and Teeri J.A. 1992. Seasonal responses of leaf gas ex-change to elevated carbon dioxide in Populus grandidentata. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1320-1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis P.S. and Wang X.Z. 1998. A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299-313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DesRochers A., van den Driessche R. and Thomas B.R. 2003. Ni-trogen fertilization of trembling aspen seedlings grown on soils of different pH. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 552-560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickmann D.L.I., Isebrands J.G., Eckenwalder J.E. and Richard-son J. 2001. Poplar culture in North America. NRC Research Press, 397 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Dickson R.E., Coleman M.D., Riemenschneider D.E., Isebrands J.G., Hogan G.D. and Karnosky D.F. 1998. Growth of 5 hybrid poplar genotypes exposed to interacting elevated CO2 and O3. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1706-1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grant M.C. and Mitton J.B. 1979. Elevational gradients in adult sex ratios and sexual differentiation in vegetative growth rates of Populus tremuloides Michx. Evolution 33: 914-918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Walter W. and Wolfinger R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 633 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Michael D.A., Isebrands J.G., Dickmann D.I. and Nelson N.D. 1988. Growth and development during the establishment year of Populus clones with contrasting morphology and phenology. Tree Physiol. 4: 139-152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mortensen L.M. 1987. Review: CO2 enrichment in greenhouses, crop responses. Scientia Hort. 33: 1-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson E.B. and Peterson N.M. 1992. Ecology, management and use of aspen and balsam poplar in the prairie provinces. For. Can. Northwest Reg. North. For Cent. Edmonton, Alberta. Spec. Rep. 1 252 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Radoglou K.M. and Jarvis P.G. 1990a. Effects of CO2 enrichment on four poplar clones. I. Growth and leaf anatomy. Ann. Bot. 65: 617-626Google Scholar
  18. Radoglou K.M. and Jarvis P.G. 1990b. Effects of CO2 enrichment on four poplar clones. I. Leaf surface properties. Ann. Bot. 65: 627-632Google Scholar
  19. Rogers H.H., Runion G.B. and Krupa S.V. 1994. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Pollut. 83: 155-189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas B.R. 1996. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in trembling aspen _Populus tremuloides Michaux_. PhD. Diss. Dept. of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmon-ton, AB, Canada, 162 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Thomas B.R., Macdonald S.E. and Dancik B.P. 1997. Variance components, heritabilities and gain estimates for growth cham-ber and field performance of Populus tremuloides: growth pa-rameters. Silvae Genetica 46: 317-326Google Scholar
  22. Tupker K.A. 2001. Response of trembling aspen _Populus tremu-loides Michaux_ and hybrid poplar _Populus spp._ to increased CO2 in the greenhouse. MSc Diss. Dept. of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 117 pp.Google Scholar
  23. von Caemmerer S. and Farquhar G.D. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376-387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang S. and Curtis P.S. 2001. Gender-specific responses of Popu-lus tremuloides to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. New Phytolo-gist 150: 675-684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang S. Curtis P.S. Pregitzer K.S. and Zak D.R. 2000. Genotypic variation in physiological and growth responses of Populus tremuloides to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Tree Phys. 20: 1019-1028Google Scholar
  26. Wullschleger S.D., Ziska L.H. and Bunce J.A. 1994. Respiratory responses of higher plants to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Physiol. Plantarum 90: 221-229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zak D.R., Pregitzer K.S., Curtis P.S., Vogel C.S., Holmes W.E. and Lussenhop J. 2000. Atmospheric CO2, soil-N availability, and allocation of biomass and nitrogen by Populus tremuloides. Ecol. Applic. 10: 34-46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeleznik J.D. and Skousen J.G. 1996. Survival of three tree spe-cies on old reclaimed surface mines in Ohio. J. Environ. Qual. 25: 1429-1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zsuffa L. 1992. Experiences in vegetative propagation of Populus and Salix and problems related to clonal strategies. In: Baker F.W.G. _ed._, Rapid Propagation of Fast-growing Woody Species. Redwood Press Ltd., London, pp. 86-97Google Scholar
  30. Zsuffa L., Giordano E., Pryor L.D. and Stettler R.F. 1996. Trends in poplar culture: some global and regional perspectives. In: Stettler R.F., Bradshaw H.D. Jr., Heilman P.E. and Hinckley T.M. _eds_, Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press. Ottawa, pp. 515-539Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kendall A. Tupker
    • 1
  • Barb R. Thomas
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Ellen Macdonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Renewable ResourcesUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, ABCanada

Personalised recommendations