Abstract
This article reports on one outcome from a three-year study with pre-service primary teachers at Goldsmiths' College, University of London. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of participants' prior educational experience and beliefs about the relationship between design & technology (D&T) and science on their lesson planning for these subjects during school placements. Data from the study support a three-domain model of pre-service teachers' thinking and action. When operating within the pragmatic domain, participants are primarily concerned with survival in the classroom, resulting in short-term planning which may contradict their epistemological and curricular beliefs. In the pedagogical domain, the focus shifts from the pre-service teacher themselves and their immediate survival to the learning potential of the activities they plan. There is evidence that some participants have progressed to operating within a philosophical domain, leading to clasroom practice which reflects and re-conceptualises pre-service teachers' core beliefs about the nature of, and relationship between, D&T and science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aikenhead, G. & Ryan, A.: 1992, ‘Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science', Science Education 76(6), 559–580.
Barlex, D., Banks, F., Owen-Jackson, G., Jarvinen, E. & Rutland, M.: 2000, ‘Findings of an International Teacher Training Research Study, the DEPTH Project', Proceedings-PATT 10 Conference, The Netherlands, 23–32.
Banks, F., Leach, J. & Moon, R.: 1999, ‘New Understandings of Teachers' Pedagogic Knowledge', in Leach, J. & Moon, R. (eds.), Learners and Pedagogy, Paul Chapman Publishing, London, 89–110.
Britzman, D.: 1986, ‘Cultural Myths in the Making of a Teacher: Biography and Social Structure in Teacher Education', Harvard Educational Review 56(4), 442–446.
Cross, A. & McCormick, R.: 1986, Technology in Schools, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Davies, D. & Rogers, M.: 2000, ‘Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Planning for Science and Technology Activities-Influences and Constraints', Research in Science and Technology Education 18(2), 213–223.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE): 1998, Circular 4/98: Requirements for Course of Initial Teacher Training, DfEE, London.
Gardner, P.: 1994, ‘Representations of the Relationship between Science and Technology in the Curriculum', Studies in Science Education 24(1), 1–13.
Giere, R.: 1993, ‘Science and Technology Studies: Prospects for an Enlightened Postmodern Synthesis', Science, Technology and Human Values 18(1), 101–112.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago.
Haggerty, L.: 1995, New Ideas for Teacher Education, Cassell, London.
Hauglustiane-Charlier, B.: 1997, ‘Why Do We Want to Change Teachers' Beliefs and How Could We Support These Changes?', European Journal of Teacher Education 20(3), 227–242.
Hodson, D.: 1993, ‘Teaching and Learning about Science: Considerations in the Philosophy and Sociology of Science', In Edwards, D., Scanlon, E. & West, D. (eds.), Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Science Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Jarvis, T. & Rennie, L.: 1996, ‘Perceptions about Technology held by Primary Teachers in England', Research in Science and Technology Education 14(1), 43–55.
John, D.: 1991, ‘A Qualitative Study of British Student Teachers' Lesson Planning Perspectives', Journal of Education for Teaching 17(3), 301–320.
Johnston, J. & Hayed, M.: 1995, ‘Teachers' Perceptions of Science and Science Teaching', European Conference on Research in Science Education Proceedings, Leeds.
Kennedy, M.: 1991, An Agenda for Research on Teacher Learning, National Centre for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.
Lacey, C.: 1977, The Socialization of Teachers, Methuen, London.
Lauda, D. P.: 1985, ‘Technology Education: A Fundamental Framework for Improved Capability in Mathematics and Science', The Technology Teacher 45(2), 3–6.
Layton, D.: 1993, Technology's Challenge to Science Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Lelas, S.: 1993, ‘Science as Technology', Science as Culture 44, 423–442.
McCulloch, G., Jenkins, E. & Layton, D.: 1985, Technological Revolution? The Politics of School Science and Technology in England and Wales since 1945, Falmer Press, London.
McCormick, R. & Murphy, P.: 1994, ‘Learning the Processes in Technology', British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (BERA 94).
Miles, S., Everton, T. & Bonnett, M.: 1994, ‘Primary Partnership Matters: Some Views from the Profession', Cambridge Journal of Education 24(1), 49–65.
Mitcham, C.: 1980, ‘Philosophy of Technology', in Durbin, P. (ed.), A Guide to the Culture of Science, Technology and Medicine, MacMillan, New York.
Schon, D.: 1983, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.
Schulman, L. S.: 1987, ‘Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform', Harvard Educational Review 7(1), 1–22.
Tann, S.: 1993, ‘Eliciting Student Teachers' Personal Theories', in Calderhead, J. & Gates, P. (eds.), Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development, Falmer Press, London.
Teacher Training Agency (TTA): 2002, Standards for the Award of Qualified Teacher Status, TTA, London.
Tillema, H.: 1997, ‘Guest Editorial: Stability and Change in Student Teachers' Beliefs', European Journal of Teacher Education 20(3), 209–212.
Wolpert, L.: 1992, The Unnatural Nature of Science, Faber, London.
Ziman, J.: 1968, Public Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Zoller, U. & Ben-Chaim, D.: 1994, ‘Views of Prospective Teachers versus Practising Teachers about Science, Technology and Society Issues', Research in Science & Technological Education 12(1), 77–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, D. Pragmatism, Pedagogy and Philosophy A Model of Thought and Action in Action in Primary Technology and Science Teacher Education . International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13, 207–221 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026140422569
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026140422569