Skip to main content
Log in

Research Methods and Types of Evidence for Research in Educational Technology

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent concern about lack of scientific rigor in educational research has led to a reexamination of educational research methods. Methodology requires particular attention when researchers study learning in complex learning environments such as classrooms or computer-driven environments that simulate complex processes. This article reaffirms the importance of experimental research for answering some research questions. It argues that nonexperimental methods, such as design experiments and methods applied to the study of large-scale educational programs, such as randomized field trials, are useful for answering other kinds of research questions about learning in complex settings. This article discusses the validity of evidence gathered using these nonexperimental methods. Finally, it suggests that the study of the dynamics of learning can help integrate data from experiments that reveal details about learning and data from nonexperimental research that reveal how learning occurs in complex settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boruch, R., de Moya, D., and Snyder, B. (2002). The importance of randomized field trials in education and related areas. In Mosteller, F., and Boruch, R., (eds.), Evidence Matters: Randomized Field trials in Education Research, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 50–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical, and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J. Learn. Sci. 2(2): 141–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev. Educ. Res. 53: 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition, and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development, Erlbaum, Mawah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T., and Payne, M. R. (2002). Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In Mosteller, F., and Boruch, R. (eds.), Evidence Matters: Randomized Field Trials in Education Research, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csiko, G. A. (1989). Unpredictability, and indeterminism in human behavior: Arguments, and implications for educational research. Educ. Res. 18(3): 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K. R. (1985). Two dogmas of educational research. Educ. Res. 14(8): 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowich, J. M., and Young, M. F. (2001). Locating an ecological psychology method of situated action. J. Learn. Sci. 10(1/2): 165–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). The case for evidence-based practice, and issue-driven research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 15(4): 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (1983). After the wake: Postpositivism in educational thought. Educ. Res. 12(5): 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (2001). Situating cognition. J. Learn. Sci. 10(1/2): 27–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R., and Towne, L. (eds.) (2002). Scientific Research in Education National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T., and Port, R. F. (1995). It's about time. In Port, R. F., and Van Gelder, T. (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. D. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev.14(3): 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. D. (2003). Learning in artificial environments: Embodiment, embeddedness, and dynamic adaptation. Technol. Instr. Cognit. Learn. 1(1): 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. D. (in press). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications, and Technology (2nd edn.), Erlbaum, Mawah, NJ.

  • Winn, W. D., Windschitl, M., Fruland, R., and Lee, Y. L. (2002). When does immersion in a virtual environment help students construct understanding? In Bell, P., Stevens, R., and Satwitz, T. (eds.), Keeping Learning Complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Erlbaum, Mawah, NJ, pp. 150–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Winn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winn, W. Research Methods and Types of Evidence for Research in Educational Technology. Educational Psychology Review 15, 367–373 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026131416764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026131416764

Navigation