Skip to main content
Log in

The Contributions and Impact of Professor William H. Riker

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the significant and extensive impactof W.H. Riker's works on the study of political science andpublic choice. We provide a citation analysis, peer reviews,and commentaries from former colleagues and students. Thecitation analysis shows that Riker's work has been cited morethan 3700 times by over 2000 different scholars in more than500 different journals. Peers, former colleagues and studentshighly respected him as a scholar and a person. Riker's mostsignificant intellectual contributions include using gametheory to analyze political behavior and incorporatingrational interest theory as a basis for the scientific studyof politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, J. (2002). William H. Riker. Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Forthcoming.

  • Amadae, S.M. and Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1999). The Rochester School: The origins of positive political theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 269-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1963). Social choice and individual values. London: Yale University Press. Second edition (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision making. Journal of Political Eocnomy 56: 23-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Shepsle, K. (2001). William Harrison Riker: 1920-1993. Biographical Memoirs 79. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. and Sturges, P. (1986). Who's who in economics: A biography of major economists, 1700-1981. Second U.S. edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden, G.C. and Ellis, L.V. (1993). A method for identifying the most influential articles in an academic discipline. Atlantic Economic Journal 21: 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden, G.C., Ellis, L.V. and Millsaps, S.W. (1991). Gordon Tullock: His Journal and his scholarship. Public Choice 71: 171-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden, G.C. and Millsaps, S.W. (1996). James Buchanan's contributions to social and economic thought: Citation counts, self-assessment, and peer review. Constitutional Political Economy 7: 133-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.P. and Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B.T., Austin, R., Brooks, J. and Moore, J.B. (1984). Economics departmental rankings: Comment. American Economic Review 74: 822-826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koford, K. (1991). On dimensionalizing roll call votes in the United States Congress. American Political Science Review 85: 955-975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D.N. (1986). A ranking of the top U.S. economics departments by research productivity of graduates. Journal of Economic Education 17: 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S.I. and Palmer, J.P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature 22: 77-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, G. (2001). Is democracy impossible?: Riker's mistaken accounts of antebellum politics. Paper presented at the Public Choice Society, San Antonio, Texas 2001.

  • Mackie, G. (2001). The coherence of democracy. Canberra. Unpublished manuscript.

  • McKelvey, R.D. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I. (2002). William H. Riker and the invention of heresthetic(s). British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.

  • McLean, I. and Bustani, C. (1999). Irish potatoes and British politics: Interest, ideology, heresthetic and the repeal of the corn laws. Political Studies 47: 817-836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medoff, M.H. (1989). The ranking of economists. Journal of Economic Education 20: 405-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.C. (1988). Virginia, Rochester, and Bloomington: Twenty-five years of public choice and political science. Public Choice 56: 101-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1976). Public choice: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 14: 395-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, S.C. (1989). Persuasion, manipulation, and dimension. The Journal of Politics 51: 36-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, R.E. (1976). Some quantitative aspects of the economics journal literature. Journal of Political Economy 84: 741-755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, operation, maintenance. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1980). Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. American Political Science Review 74: 432-446, 456-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1982a). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1982b). The two-party system and Duverger's Law: An essay on the history of political science. American Political Science Review 76: 753-766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1983). Political theory and the art of heresthetics. In A.W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline, 47-67. Washington: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1984). The heresthetics of constitution making: The presidency in 1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice. American Political Science Review 78: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1988). The place of political science in public choice. Public Choice 37: 247- 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1996). The strategy of rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62: 25-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1973). Introduction to positive political theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (1997). Generic existence of a core for Q-rules. Economic Theory 9: 219-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1995). Rational choice and political economy. Critical Review 9: 189-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2000). Ideology, party and interest in the British Parliament of 1841-1947. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1984). Uncovered sets and sophisticated voting outcomes with implications for agenca institutions. American Journal of Political Science 28: 49-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1995). Positive theories of congressional institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1981). Why so much stability? Public Choice 37: 189-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maske, K., Durden, G. The Contributions and Impact of Professor William H. Riker. Public Choice 117, 191–220 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026117828869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026117828869

Keywords

Navigation