Skip to main content
Log in

Biological activities and structure-activity relationship of substitution compounds of N-[2-(3-indolyl)ethyl]succinamic acid and N-[2-(1-naphthyl)ethyl]succinamic acid, derived from a new category of root-promoting substances, N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid analogs

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a previous study, it was demonstrated that N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid (PESA) derivatives form a new category of root-promoting substances which do not exhibit auxin-like activities, such as stem elongation and leaf epinasty (Soejima et al., 2000 [Plant Cell Physiol. 41s: 197]). In this study, N-[2-(3-indolyl)ethyl]succinamic acid (IESA) and N-[2-(1-naphthyl)ethyl]succinamic acid (NESA) were synthesized, and their biological activities were evaluated. In an adzuki root-promoting assay, IESA and NESA exhibited root-promoting activity equivalent to PESA. In adzuki stem elongation assays, elongation activity was not observed in the stem segments soaked in either an IESA or NESA aqueous solution, whereas the stem segments immersed in Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) or 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA) aqueous solution were clearly elongated. In an epinastic bending study, IAA and NAA exhibited leaf epinasty, whereas IESA and NESA did not, suggesting that the IESA and NESA derivatives belong to the same category of root-promoting substances as PESA derivatives and are different from auxin-like substances. In addition, eleven kinds of IESA derivatives and nineteen kinds of NESA derivatives were synthesized, and their root-promoting activities were measured. The activities of methyl ester derivatives were approximately three times higher than that of the acid compounds, with exceptions for some compounds. The partition coefficient (P) between 1-octanol and water for each IESA, NESA, and PESA derivative was measured in order to evaluate the hydrophobicity of their molecules and to determine their structure–activity relationship. The results indicate that the root-promoting activity of the acid compounds was significantly correlated with their hydrophobicity, whereas that of ester derivatives was not correlated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartel B 1997 Auxin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 51-66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brian P W, Hemming H G and Lowe D 1960 Inhibition of rooting of cuttings by gibberellic acid. Ann. Bot. 24, 407-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criley R A and Parvin P E 1979 Promotive effects of auxins, ethephon and daminozide on the rooting of Protea melifolia cuttings. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104, 592-596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis T D, Sankla N, Walsee R and Upadhyaya A 1985 Promotion of adventitious root formation on cuttings by paclobtrazol. Hort. Sci. 20, 883-884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett C H, Wain R L and Wightman F 1960 The metabolism of 3-indolylalkanecarboxic acids, and their amides, nitriles and methyl esters in plant tissues. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 152, 231-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R E, Asare-Boamah N K, Kreig L C, Hofstra G and Dumbroff E B 1988 Triadimefon stimulate rooting in bean hypocotyl. Physiol. Plant. 73, 401-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfagena T 1995 Natural and synthetic growth regulators and their use in horticultural and agronomic crops. In Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (2nd ed). Ed. P J Davies. pp. 751-773. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi M, Toriyama K, Kondo M and Nishimura M 1998 2,4-Dichlorophenoxybutyric acid-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis have defects in glyoxysomal fatty acid ß-oxidation. Plant Cell 10, 183-195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kato J 1958 Studies on the physiological effect of gibberellin. II. On the interaction of gibberellin with auxin and growth inhibitors. Physiol. Plant. 11, 10-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuhashi M, Shibaoka H and Shimokoriyama M 1969 Potulal: a rooting promoting substance in Portulaca leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 10, 715-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore T C 1989 Biochemistry and Physiology of Plant Hormones (2nd ed). Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA. pp. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan R and Zhao Z 1994 Synergistic effects of plant growth retardants and IBA on the formation of adventitious roots in hypocotyl cuttings of mung bean. Plant Growth Regul. 14, 15-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider E A, Kazakoff C W and Wightman F 1985 Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry evidence for several endogenous auxins in pea seedling organs. Planta 165, 232-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soejima H, Aoshima M, Yamashita K and Ishii K 1999a Purification and isolation of a novel root-promoting substance, N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid. pp. 75-76. Proceedings of the 34th annual symposium of the Japanese Society for Chemical Regulation of Plants, October 1999. JSCRP, Tottori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soejima H, Itagaki M, Ishii K, Eshima T and Hayashi Y 1999b Some characteristics of biological activities of the novel rootpromoting substance, N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid. pp. 77-78. Proceedings of the 34th annual symposium of the Japanese Society for Chemical Regulation of Plants, October 1999. JSCRP, Tottori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soejima H, Hayashi Y, Eshima T, Ishii K and Fujita T 1999c Structure-activity relationship of N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid derivatives. pp. 79-80. Proceedings of the 34th annual symposium of the Japanese Society for Chemical Regulation of Plants, October 1999. JSCRP, Tottori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soejima H, Hayashi Y, Itagaki M, Eshima T, Ishii K and Fujita T 2000 Biological activities of root-promoting substance, N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid, and its structure-activity relationship. Plant Cell Physiol. 41s, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styer R C and Koranski D S 1997 Plug & Transplant Production: A Grower's Guide. Ball Publishing, Batavia, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takematsu T 1967 Screening of plant growth regulators and the raphanus test. Chem. Regul. Plants 2, 132-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wain R L and Wightman F 1954 The growth-regulating activity of certain ?-substituted alkyl carboxilic acids in relation to their ß-oxidation within the plant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 142, 525-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolman B K, Yonder A and Bartel B 2000. Genetic analysis of indole-3-acetic acid responses in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals four mutant classes. Genetics 156, 1323-1337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Soejima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Itagaki, M., Soejima, H., Ishii, K. et al. Biological activities and structure-activity relationship of substitution compounds of N-[2-(3-indolyl)ethyl]succinamic acid and N-[2-(1-naphthyl)ethyl]succinamic acid, derived from a new category of root-promoting substances, N-(phenethyl)succinamic acid analogs. Plant and Soil 255, 67–75 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026117726085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026117726085

Navigation