Skip to main content
Log in

Democracy, Government Spending, and Economic Growth: A Political-Economic Explanation of the Barro-Effect

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper develops a political economicargument for the recently observed inverseu-shaped relation between the level ofdemocracy and economic performance. A modelis constructed that shows why and howpolitical participation influences thespending behavior of opportunisticgovernments that can choose an optimalcombination of rents and public goods toattract political support. If the level ofdemocracy remains comparably low,governments rationally choose rents as aninstrument to assure political support.With increasing democratic participation,however, rents become an increasinglyexpensive instrument while the provision ofpublic goods becomes more and moreefficient in ensuring the incumbentgovernment's survival in power. As a consequence, an increase in democracy tends toraise growth rates of per capita income.However, the beneficial impact of democracyon growth holds true only for moderatedegrees of political participation. If –in semi-democratic countries – politicalparticipation increases further,governments have an incentive toover-invest in the provision of publicgoods. This model allows to derive and testthree hypothesis: Firstly, based on asimple endogenous growth model, weempirically substantiate our hypothesis ofa non-linear, inverse u-shaped relationbetween the level of democracy and growthof per capita income. Secondly, we showthat the impact of government spending oneconomic growth is higher in moredemocratic countries. Thirdly, wedemonstrate that the level of democracy andgovernment share of GDP are correlated in au-shaped manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, B.A. and Settle, R.F. (1999). Women's suffrage and the growth of the welfare state. Public Choice 100: 289-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1997). The politics of growth. A survey. In: Bergström, V. (Ed.), Government and growth, 11-49. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 465-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D. (1992). Income distribution and economic growth. A simple theory and some empirical evidence. In: Cukierman, A., Hercovitz, Z. and Leiderman, L. (Eds.), The political economy of business cycles and growth, 23-50. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N. and Cohen, G.D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, B. (1987). Political survival. Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 407-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1997). Determinants of economic growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.-W. (1996). International measures of schooling years and schooling quality. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 86: 218-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.-W. (1993). International comparisons of educational attainment. Journal of Monetary Economics 32: 363-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. and Walsh, P. (2000). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. Policy research working paper 2283, Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, R. (1996). Inequality and growth. In: Bernanke, B. and Rotemberg, J. (Eds.), NBER macroeconomics annual. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A. (1997). Political variables in cross-country growth analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys 11: 163-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G., and Weder, B. (1997). Credibility of rules and economic growth: Evidence from a worldwide survey of the private Sector. Policy research working paper 1760, Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno deMesquita, B., Morrow, J.D., Siverson, R.M. and Smith, A. (1999). Policy failure and political survival. The contribution of political institutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43: 147-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clague, C., Keefer, P., Knack, S. and Olson, M. (1996). Property and contract rights under democracy and dictatorship. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 243-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, J.B. and Summers, L.H. (1991). Equipment investment and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 445-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2000). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth. An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics 32: 417-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth. What do we really know? Economic Journal 108: 383-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.C. (1978). Perspectives on capital and technology in less developed countries. In Artis, M.J. and Nobay, A.R. (Eds.), Contemporary economic analysis, 15-40. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W.J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics 12: 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, T.A. and Kenny, L.W. (1997). The effect of the expansion of the voting franchise on the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 105: 54-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggers, K. and Gurr, T.R. (1995). Tracking democracy's third wave with Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32: 469-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, R. and Meguire, P.C. (1985). Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 141-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. and Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review 82: 942-963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G.N., Romer, D. and Weil, D.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 407-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.W. and Plümper, T. (2001). Regimetyp und Wirtschaftswachstum. Swiss Political Science Review 7: 45-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehru, V. and Dhareshwar, A. (1993). A new database on physical capital stock: Sources, methodology, and results. Revista de Análisis Económico 8: 37-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, H. (2001). Demokratie und Wirtschaftswachstum. Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Befunde des quantitativen internationalen Vergleichs. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 8: 321-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1991). Autocracy, democracy and prosperity. In Zeckhauser, R.J. (Ed.), Strategy and choice, 131-157. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review: 567-576.

  • Payne, J.L. (1991). Elections and government spending. Public Choice 70: 71-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. (2002). Do political institutions shape economic policy? Econometrica 70: 883-895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review 84: 600-621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plümper, T. (2001). Die Politik wirtschaftlichen Wachstums in autoritären Staaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 42: 79-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. and Limongi, F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 51-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D.P. and Wooley, J.T. (2001). Democracy and national economic performance: The preference for stability. American Journal of Political Science 45: 634-657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, F. and Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptics guide to the cross-national evidence. Mimeo. JFK School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1996). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? NBER working paper 5537. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1995). Economic Reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). I just ran 2 million regressions. American Economic Review 87: 178-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. and Wagner, A. (2001). Institutions of conflict management and economic growth in the European Union. Kyklos 54: 509-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirowy, L. and Inkeles, A. (1990). The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review. Studies in Comparative International Development 25: 126-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plümper, T., Martin, C.W. Democracy, Government Spending, and Economic Growth: A Political-Economic Explanation of the Barro-Effect. Public Choice 117, 27–50 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026112530744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026112530744

Keywords

Navigation