Skip to main content
Log in

Zoophilia in Men: A Study of Sexual Interest in Animals

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a study of 114 self-defined zoophile men who were researched primarily through the use of an on-line questionnaire. We describe how the participants acquired the identity label of zoophile, what it meant to them, and their relationships among themselves. Also examined are how they eroticized animals and how human and feral characteristics combined to form this object choice. Finally, participants' sexual profiles with animals and humans, and how the balance of animal and human desires creates different forms of zoophilia, are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittleman, M., & Rouleau, J. L. (1988). Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry, and Law, 16, 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allgeier, E. R., & Allgeier, A. R. (2000). Sexual interactions (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, W. A., & Freinhar, J. P. (1991). A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 38, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic, and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Beastly passions. (2000, December 3). The Independent on Sunday, pp. 32–33.

  • Beck, A. M., & Katcher, A. H. (1996). Between pets, and people. The importance of animal companionship. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2000). Rethinking bestiality: Towards a concept of interspecies sexual assault. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. A. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals, and us: Exploring the relationships between people, and pets (pp. 313–331). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. D., & Snizek, W. (1993). On the trail of the centaur. Society, 30, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornog, M., & Perper, T. (1994). Bestiality. In V. L. Bullough & B. Bullough (Eds.), Human sexuality: An encyclopedia (pp. 60–63). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, M. (2000). Dearest pet. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, K. F., & Bryant, C. D. (2002). Log on to sex: Erotic cyberspace as a new frontier. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Deviance, and social control (pp. 185–194). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earls, C. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2000). A case study of preferential bestiality (zoophilia). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research, and Treatment, 14, 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, P. H. (1965). Situational factors affecting human sexual behavior. In F. A. Beach (Ed.), Sex, and behavior (pp. 483–495). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. T., & Holmes, R. M. (2002). Sex crimes: Patterns, and behavior (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2000). Setting the boundaries: Reforming the law on sex offences. London: Home Office Communications Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humane Society of the United States. (2001). Available from www.hsus.org

  • Hunt, M. M. (1974). Sexual behavior in the 1970's. Chicago: Playboy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (Ed.). (1994). What is an animal? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S., & Schockman, H. E. (1998). Democratizing Internet access in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual communities. In B. Ebo (Ed.), Cyberghetto of cybertopia: Race, class, and gender on the Internet (pp. 170–184). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenius, S. (2001). Bisexuals, and BDSM: Bisexual people in a pansexual community. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W., Johnson, V., & Kolodny, R. C. (1995). Human sexuality. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (1994). The horseman. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miletski, H. (2002). Understanding bestiality, and zoophilia. Germantown, MD: Ima Tek Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, G. H. (1999). Inside the animal mind. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A., & Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A guide to America's sex laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Tikkanen, T., & Mansson, S. A. (2000). Differences between internet samples, and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: Implications for research, and HIV interventions. Social Science, and Medicine, 51, 749–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M. (1999, December 15). All opposed, say neigh. Riverfront Times, p. 10.

  • Savishinsky, J. (1983). Pet ideas: The domestication of animals, human behavior, and human emotions. In A. H. Katcher & A. M. Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 112–131). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2001). Retrieved from www.nerve.com/Opinions/Singer/heavyPetting/main.asp?

  • Strong, B., DeVault, C., Sayad, B. W., & Yarber, W. L. (2002). Human sexuality: Diversity in contemporary America. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1983). Man, and the natural world. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, C. E. (2001). Bestiality. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Encyclopedia of criminology, and deviant behavior (pp. 19–22). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Calhan, C. (1995). “If the shoe fits...”: Exploring male homosexual foot fetishism. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual attraction: Understanding bisexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin S. Weinberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, C.J., Weinberg, M.S. Zoophilia in Men: A Study of Sexual Interest in Animals. Arch Sex Behav 32, 523–535 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026085410617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026085410617

Navigation