Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regenerating rural economies: The case of Limehill, South Africa

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of the quality of life of rural South Africans has become a key focus of attention of the national and provincial governments in postapartheid South Africa. This focus stems from legislation that enshrines concurrent responsibility for rural development to both these spheres of government. However, post-1995 legislation including the introduction of wall-to-wall municipal authorities and the subsequent initiatives by municipalities to assume responsibility for service delivery in their areas have infused considerable complexity into the development landscape at the local level. Within this context and against the background of different perspectives and strategies for rural development, this paper examines, in a case study of the Limehill Complex within the Ndaka Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal, the specific development problems that the `deep' rural communities experience. The paper then discusses strategic interventions that the Ndaka Municipality, in conjunction with other role players and the different spheres of government, needs to consider for implementation in order to regenerate the rural economy of the Limehill Complex and assist in the alleviation of widespread poverty in the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen T. and Thomas A. (eds), 2000: Poverty and development in the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank L., 2001: Living together, moving apart: Home-made agendas, identity politics and urban-rural linkages in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 19(1): 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank L., 2002: Beyond red and school: Gender, tradition and identity in the rural Eastern Cape. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28(3): 631–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya S., 2001: Capitalist development, peasant differentiation and the state: Survey findings from West Bengal. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 28(4): 95–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bob U., 2000: Gender, the role of the chieftaincy and rural women's access to land under the land reform programme in KwaZulu-Natal, 7(2): 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley D.B., 1986: The case study method in psychology and related disciplines. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplovitz D., 1983: The stages of social research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee J.K., Graaff J., Hendricks F. and Wood G. (eds), 2001: Development: theory, policy, and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Totman and Associates, 2000a: Emnambithi subregional plan-Land use management plan. (No place of publication given).

  • David Totman and Associates, 2000b: Emnambithi subregional plan-Phase three report-Implementation plan. (No place of publication given).

  • Desai A., 2001: The Poors of Chatsworth-Race, class and social movements in postapartheid South Africa. Madiba Publishers, Durban.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux S., 2001: Livelihood insecurity and social protection: A reemerging issue in rural development. Development Policy Review, 19(4): 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerman A., 2001: From 'abaixo' to 'chiefs of production': Agrarian change in Nampula Province, Mozambique, 1975-87. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 28(2): 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolny H., 2001: Banking on change. Sandton (South Africa): Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond J., 1992: Towards a geography of development for the rural periphery. In: Rogerson C. and McCarthy J.J. (eds), Geography in a changing South Africa, pp. 265–280. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen M., 2001: Rural nonfarm employment: Agricultural versus urban linkages-Some evidence from Kerala State, India. World Development, 28(3): 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar G., 1992: Imagining a postdevelopment era. Social Text, 31, 20–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteva G., 1992: Development. In: Sachs W. (ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power, pp. 6–25. Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis E., 1999: Learning from the local: Rural livelihoods in Ditsobotla, North West Province, South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 17(1), 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim C., 1987: Research design: Strategies and choices in the design of social research. Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison P.A., 2002: The impact of tourism on agriculture in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Unpublished masters dissertation, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella J., Wilson S., de Jong F. and Renting H., 2000: Pluriactivity as a livelihood strategy in Irish farm households and its role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4): 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Administration, 1998: An integrated rural development white paper for KwaZulu-Natal. KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Administration.

  • Leutner C.E., 1999: The economic development approach to legal reform for rural women: A methodological alternative. Development Southern Africa, 16(1): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhanya E.M. and Ngidi M.M., 1999: Poverty and rural livelihoods in Umzumbe. The South African Geographical Journal, 81(1): 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbele T., 1998: What does a rural destination area look like? Institutions and livelihoods in KwaDumisa. Development Southern Africa, 15(4): 669–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam S.B., 1988: Case study research in education-A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metroplan, 2000: Implementation plan for the Okhahlamba subregion of the uThukela Regional Council. Pietermaritzburg.

  • Motteux N., Binns T., Rowntree K. and Nel E., 1999: Empowerment for development: Taking participatory appraisal further in rural South Africa. Development in Practice, 9(3): 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntsebeza L., 2001: Traditional authorities and rural development in postapartheid South Africa: The case of the Transkei region of the Eastern Cape. In: Coetzee J.K., Graaff J., Hendricks F. and Wood G. (eds), Development: Theory, policy, and practice, pp. 317–330. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr A. and Mwale B., 2001: Adapting to adjustment: Smallholder livelihood strategies in Southern Malawi. World Development, 29(8): 1325–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pycroft C., 2000: Integrated development planning and rural local government in South Africa. Third World Planning Review, 22(1): 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema M., 1997: Towards post-development: Searching for signposts, a new language and new paradigms. In: Rahnema M. and Bawtree V. (eds), The Post Development Reader, pp. 377–403. Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, 1996: Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act, No. 108 of 1996. Government Printer, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, 1998a: Local Government: Municipal Demarcation Act (Act 27 of 1998). Government Printer, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, 1998b: Municipal Structures Act. Government Printer, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, 2002: Local Government: Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2002). Government Printer, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles W., 2001: The landless rural workers movement in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 28(2), 146–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson C., 2001: Tourism and spatial development initiatives-The case of the Maputo development corridor. South African Geographical Journal, 83(2), 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland A.M., 2001: Population as a determinant of local outcomes under decentralization: Illustrations from small municipalities in Bolivia and Mexico. World Development, 29(8): 1373–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins M., 1997: The original affluent society. In: Rahnema M. and Bawtree V. (eds), The Post Development Reader, pp. 3–21. Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmen L.F., 1987: Listen to the people: Participant-observer evaluation of development projects. Oxford, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer A., 1992: Methods in social science-A realist approach (2nd Ed.). Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman F.J., 1993: Beyond the impasse: New directions in development theory. Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Wilson Planning and Economics, 2000: uMtshezi subregional development plan: Final implementation plan. Durban.

  • Shackleton C.M., Shackleton S.E. and Cousins B., 2001: The role of land-based strategies in rural livelihoods: The contribution of arable production, animal husbandry and natural resource harvesting in communal areas in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 18(5): 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley R., 2002: Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 23: 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sithole P., 2000: Development, clubs and committees: Local versions of development discourse in the Msinga district of northern KwaZulu-Natal. Alternation, 7(2): 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John S. and Willmore L., 2001: Two legs are better than three: New Zealand as a model for old age pensions. World Development, 29(8): 1291–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner S., 2001: Tourism, the environment, and rural development. In: Coetzee J.K., Graaff J., Hendricks F. and Wood G. (eds), Development: Theory, Policy, and Practice, pp. 361–375. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen J.H. and Naicker K., 2000: Nature-based tourism on communal land: The Mavhulani experience. Development Southern Africa, 17(1): 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W.J., 1990: The truly disadvantaged-The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R.K., 1984: Case study research: Design and methods.Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Fort Hare, 5700, Alice, Republic of South Africa

    Cecil Seethal

Authors
  1. Cecil Seethal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seethal, C. Regenerating rural economies: The case of Limehill, South Africa. GeoJournal 57, 61–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026079121023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026079121023

Keywords

Search

Navigation