Abstract
Electrophoretic analysis of the most abundant subtype of histone H1 (H1-1) of 301 accessions of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus) and 575 accessions of lentil (Lens culinaris) revealed allelic variants which most probably arose due to recent mutations. In each species, a single heterozygote for a mutation was taken for construction of isogenic lines carrying different H1-1 variants. Sequencing of alleles encoding H1-1 in lentil, grasspea, pea and Lathyrus aphaca showed the presence of an extended region in C-terminal tail which we termed ‘regular zone’ (RZ). It consists of 14 6-amino-acid units of which 12 (pea and Lathyrus species) or 13 (lentil) are represented by an AKPAAK sequence. The structure of the hypervariable unit 8 is species-specific. At the DNA level most AKPAAK units differ in the third codon positions, implying the action of natural selection preserving the RZ organization. In lentil, the fast variant lost two units (including unit 8), while one AKPAAK repeat of the slow variant is transformed into an anomalous SMPAAK. The mutant variant of the grasspea H1-1 differs from the standard one by duplication of an 11-amino-acid segment in N-terminal tail. The isogenic lines of lentil and grasspea were compared for a number of quantitative traits, some of them showing small (1–8%) significant differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe, S., Y. Ito & E. Davies, 1995. Isolation of a heparin sensitive, ribosome sedimenting factor from the cytoskeleton fraction from peas and corn. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 38: 463–470.
Allan, J., P.G. Hartman, C. Crane-Robinson & F.X. Aviles, 1980. The structure of histone H1 and its location in chromatin. Nature 288: 675–679.
Allan, J., N. Mitchell, L. Harborne, C. Bohm & C. Crane-Robinson, 1986. Roles of H1 domains in determining higher order chromatin structure and H1 location. J. Mol. Biol. 187: 591–601.
Barra, J.L., L. Rhounim, J.-L. Rossignol & G. Faugeron, 2000. Histone H1 is dispensable for methylation-associated gene silencing in Ascobolus immersus and essential for long life span. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 61–69.
Belyaev, A.I. & V.A. Berdnikov, 1985. Interspecies polymorphism of H1 histone of the wild Fabaceae species. Genetika+ 21: 605–613.
Berdnikov, V.A. & F.L. Gorel, 1975. A study of ratios between histone fractions. Molekulyarnaya Biologiya (USSR) 9: 699–705.
Berdnikov, V.A., V.S. Bogdanova, F.L. Gorel & S.M. Rozov, 1992. Territorial distribution of histone H1 alleles in a population of Vicia unijuga A. Br. formed after urbanization of natural habitat. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1591–1595.
Berdnikov, V.A., S.M. Rozov, S.V. Temnykh, F.L. Gorel & O.E. Kosterin, 1993a. Adaptive nature of interspecies variation of histone H1 in insects. J. Mol. Evol. 36: 497–507.
Berdnikov, V.A., V.S. Bogdanova, S.M. Rozov & O.E. Kosterin, 1993b. The geographic patterns of histone H1 allelic frequencies formed in the course of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivation. Heredity 71: 199–209.
Berdnikov, V.A., F.L. Gorel, V.S. Bogdanova, O.E. Kosterin, Y.A. Trusov & S.M. Rozov, 1999. Effect of a substitution of a short chromosome segment carrying a histone H1 locus on expression of the homeotic gene Tl in heterozygote in the garden pea Pisum sativum L. Genet. Res. 73: 93–109.
Bogdanova, V.S., S.M. Rozov, Y.A. Trusov & V.A. Berdnikov, 1994. Phenotypic effect of substitutions of short chromosomal segments containing different alleles of histone H1 genes in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Genet. Res. 64: 35–41.
Bouvet, P., S. Dimitrov & A.P. Wolffe, 1994. Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1. Gene. Dev. 8: 1147–1159.
Buard, J., A. Bourdet, J. Yardley, Y. Dubrova & A.J. Jeffreys, 1998. Complex recombination events at the hypermutable minisatellite CEB1 (D2S90). EMBO J. 13: 3203–3210.
Comeron, J.M., 1995. A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site. J. Mol. Evol. 41: 1152–1159.
Comeron, J.M., 1999. K-estimator: calculation of the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and the confidence intervals. Bioinformatics 15: 763–764.
Corpet, F., 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 10881–10890.
Deretic, V. & W.M. Konyecsni, 1990. A prokaryotic regulatory factor with a histone H1–like carboxy-terminal domain: clonal variation of repeats within algP, a gene involved in regulation of mucoidy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 172: 5544–5554.
Ellegren, H., 2000. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 16: 551–557.
Escher, D. & W. Shaffner, 1997. Gene activation at a distance and telomeric silencing are not affected by yeast histone H1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256: 456–461.
Fan, Y., A. Sirotkin, R.G. Russel, J. Ayala & A.I. Skoultchi, 2001. Individual somatic H1 subtypes are dispensable for mouse development even in mice lacking the H1(0) replacement subtype. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 7933–7443.
Gantt, J.C. & J.L. Key, 1987. Molecular cloning of a pea H1 histone cDNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 166: 119–125.
Gorel, F.L. & V.A. Berdnikov, 1993. Linkage of loci encoding H1 histone and a cotyledon protein in lentil. J. Hered. 84: 131–133. J. Biochem. 223: 693–699.
Jedrusik, M.A. & E. Schulze, 2001. A single histone H1 isoform (H1.1) is essential for chromatin silencing and germline development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 128: 1069–1080.
Johns, E.W., 1964. Studies of histones. 7. Preparative methods for histone fractions from calf thymus. Biochem. J. 92: 55–59.
Kimura, M., 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kosterin, O.E., V.S. Bogdanova, F.L. Gorel, S.M. Rozov, Y.A. Trusov & V.A. Berdnikov, 1994. Histone H1 of the garden pea (Pisum sativum L.); composition, developmental changes, allelic polymorphism and inheritance. Plant Sci. 101: 189–202.
Laybourn, P.J. & J.T. Kadonaga, 1992. Threshold phenomena and long-distance activation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science 257: 1682–1685.
Levinson, G. & G.A. Gutman, 1987. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 203–221.
Lin, Q., A. Sirotkin & A.I. Skoultchi, 2000. Normal spermatogenesis in mice lacking the testis-specific linker histone H1t. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 2122–2128.
Panyim, S. & R. Chalkley, 1969. High resolution in acrylamide gel electrophoresis of histones. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 130: 337.
Pâques, F., G.-F. Richard & J.E. Haber, 2001. Expansions and contractions in 36–bp minisatellites by gene conversion in yeast. Genetics 158: 155–166.
Prymakowska-Bosak, M., M.R. Przewloka, J. Slusarczyk, M. Kuras, J. Lichota, B. Kilianczyk & A. Jerzmanowski, 1999. Linker histones play a role in male meiosis and the development of pollen grains in tobacco. Plant Cell 11: 2317–2329.
Przewloka, M.R., A.T. Wierzbicki, J. Slusarczyk, M. Kuras, K.D. Grasser, C. Stemmer & A. Jerzmanowski, 2002. The 'drought-inducible' histone H1s of tobacco play no role in male sterility linked to alterations in H1 variants. Planta 215: 371–379.
Ramakrishnan, V., 1997. Histone structure and the organization of the nucleosome. Annu. Rev. Bioph. Biom. 26: 83–112.
Ramon, A., M.I. Muro-Pastor, C. Scazzocchio, R. Gonzalez, 2000. Deletion of the unique gene encoding a typical histone H1 has no apparent phenotype in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 35: 223–233
Rozov, S.M., V.S. Bogdanova & V.A. Berdnikov, 1986. Different chromosomal localizations of genes coding for Pisum histone H1 fractions. Genetika+ 22: 2159–2166.
Sato, M.H., K. Ura, K.I. Hohmura, F. Tokumasu, S.H. Yoshimura, F. Hanaoka & K. Takeyasu, 1999. Atomic force microscopy sees nucleosome positioning and histone H1–induced compaction in reconstituted chromatin. FEBS Lett. 452: 267–271.
Schulze, E. & B. Schulze, 1995. The vertebrate linker histone H1–0, H5, and H1–M are descendants of invertebrate 'orphon' histone H1 genes. J. Mol. Evol. 41: 833–840.
Sera, T. & A.P. Wolffe, 1998. Role of histone H1 as an architectural determinant of chromatin structure and as a specific repressor of transcription on Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 3668–3680.
Serra, J.A., 1966. Modern Genetics, Vol. 2, Academic Press, London.
Shen, X. & M.A. Gorovsky, 1996. Linker histone H1 regulates specific gene expression but not global transcription in vivo. Cell 86: 475–483.
Shen, X., L. Yu, J.W. Weir & M.A. Gorovsky, 1995. Linker histones are not essential and affect chromatin condensation in vivo. Cell 82: 47–56.
Sirotkin, A.M., W. Edelmann, H. Cheng, A. Klein-Szanto, R. Kucherlapati & A.I. Skoultchi, 1995. Mice develop normally without the H1° linker histone. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 6434–6438.
Steinbach, O.C., A.P. Wolffe & R.A. Rupp, 1997. Somatic linker histones cause loss of mesodermal competence in Xenopus. Nature 389: 395–399.
Tanaka, I., Y. Akahori, K. Gomi, T. Suzuki & K. Ueda, 1999. A novel histone variant localized in nucleoli of higher plant cells. Chromosoma 108: 190–199.
Thoma, F., R. Losa & T. Koller, 1983. Involvement of the domains of histones H1 and H5 in the structural organization of soluble chromatin. J. Mol. Biol. 167: 619–640.
Trieschmann, L., E. Schulze, B. Schulze & U. Grossbach, 1997. The histone H1 genes of the dipteran insect, Chironomus thummi, fall under two divergent classes and encode proteins with distinct intranuclear distribution and potentially different functions. Eur. J. Biochem. 250: 184–196.
Weeden, N., T.H.N. Ellis, G.M. Timmerman-Vaughan, W.K. Swiecicki, S.M. Rozov & V.A. Berdnikov, 1998. A consensus linkage map for Pisum sativum. Pisum Genet. 30: 1–4.
Woo, H.H., L.A. Brigham & M.C. Hawes, 1995. Molecular cloning and expression of mRNAs encoding H1 histone and an H1 histone-like sequences in root tips of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 1143–1147.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berdnikov, V.A., Bogdanova, V.S., Gorel, F.L. et al. Large Changes in the Structure of the Major Histone H1 Subtype Result in Small Effects on Quantitative Traits in Legumes. Genetica 119, 167–182 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026058605485
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026058605485