Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Antioxidant BHT on the Proteolytic Apparatus of Aging Coleoptiles of Wheat Seedlings Grown in Light

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamics of changes in total proteolytic activity and activities of various groups of proteases in the coleoptiles of 3- to 12-day-old wheat seedlings grown in light with and without antioxidant BHT (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) was studied. It was established that the specialized proteases that easily hydrolyze specific synthetic substrates and the enzymes actively hydrolyzing histone H1 dominate in young coleoptiles of 3- to 4-day-old seedlings. Proteases that degrade equally well the majority of the studied substrates are accumulated in the cells of old coleoptiles of 11- to 12-day-old seedlings. Under the effect of BHT, the plants grown in the light (in comparison with etiolated seedlings) demonstrated a somewhat changed dynamics of proteolytic activity in young coleoptiles and the disappearance of proteases active toward histone H1. An inhibitory analysis revealed a relative domination of cysteine proteases in young coleoptiles at the initial development stage of seedlings, whereas the fraction of serine proteases markedly increased in old coleoptiles. We presume that the revealed quantitative and qualitative changes in the proteolytic apparatus of the coleoptile cells induced by BHT may be largely responsible for the retardant and geroprotective effect of this antioxidant in plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bleecker, A.B. and Patterson, S.E., Plant Cell, 1997, vol. 9, pp. 1169–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas, H. and Stoddart, J.L., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 1980, vol. 31, pp. 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gan, S. and Amasino, R.M., Science, 1995, vol. 270, pp. 1986–1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grbic, V. and Bleecker, A.B., Plant J., 1995, vol. 8, pp. 595–602.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bleecker, A.B., Estelle, M.A., Somerville, C., and Kende, H., Science, 1988, vol. 241, pp. 1086–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gan, S. and Amasino, R.M., Plant Physiol., 1997, vol. 113, pp. 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vanyushin, B.F., Usp. Biol. Khim., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Skulachev, V.P., Exp. Gerontol., 2001, vol. 36, pp. 995–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fedoreeva, L.I., Aleksandrushkina, N.I., Dunaevskii, Ya.E., Belozerskii, M.A., and Vanyushin, B.F., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 2002, vol. 68, pp. 570–576.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shorning, B.Yu., Smirnova, E.G., Yaguzhinskii, L.S., and Vanyushin, B.F., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 2000, vol. 65, pp. 1612–1617.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bakeeva, L.E., Zamyatnina, V.A., Shorning, B.Yu., Aleksandrushkina, N.I., and Vanyushin, B.F., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 2001, vol. 66, pp. 1048–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shorning, B.Yu., Poleshchuk, S.V., Gorbatenko, I.Yu., and Vanyushin, B.F., Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk., Ser. Biol., 1999, no. 1, pp. 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaufmann, S.H., Cancer Res., 1989, vol. 49, pp. 5870–5878.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erlanger, B.F., Kokowsky, N., and Cohen, W., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1961, vol. 95, pp. 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Habeeb, T.S., Anal. Biochem., 1966, vol. 14, pp. 328–336.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J., J. Biol. Chem., 1957, vol. 193, pp. 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunaevskii, Y.E., Aleksandrushkina, N.I., Smirnova, T.A. et al. Effect of Antioxidant BHT on the Proteolytic Apparatus of Aging Coleoptiles of Wheat Seedlings Grown in Light. Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry 29, 459–463 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026005710330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026005710330

Navigation