Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Aircraft and Ground-Based FluxMeasurements during OASIS95

  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aircraft and ground-based measurements made during the1995 Australian OASIS field campaign are compared. The aircraft data were recorded during low-level flightsat 6 m above ground level and grid flights at altitudes of between 15 and 65 m, allin unstable atmospheric conditions. The low-level flights revealed an inadequate temperaturesensor response time, a correction for which was determined from subsequent work ina wind tunnel. Aircraft and ground-based measurements of mean wind speed, wind directionand air temperature agree to within 0.2 m s-1, 4° and 0.9 °C respectively.Comparisons between aircraft and ground-based observations of the standarddeviations of vertical velocity, horizontal wind speed, air temperature and specifichumidity have slopes of 0.96, 0.97, 0.92 and 0.99 respectively but the observed scatter isroughly twice the random error expected due to the averaging length of the aircraft data andthe averaging period of the ground-based data. For the low-level flights, the ground-basedand aircraft measurements of sensible and latent heat flux show mean differences of 27 and-25 W m-2 respectively, which reduce to 11 and -4 W m-2 respectivelywhen analysis of aircraft data is limited to areas immediately adjacent to the fluxtowers. For the flights at 15 to 65 m above ground level, the mean differences between theground-based and aircraft measurements of sensible and latent heat flux are -22 and-1 W m-2 respectively and these change to -1 and -7 W m-2 respectively oncethe effect of surface heterogeneity is included. Aircraft and ground-based measurementsof net radiation agree to within 6% at one ground-based site but differ by 20% at a second.Aircraft measurements of friction velocity at 6 m above the ground agree well withground-based data, but those from flights between 15 and 65 m above ground level do not.This is because at these heights the aircraft measurements provide the local shear stress,not the surface shear stress. Overall, the level of agreement allows confidence in the aircraftdata provided due care is taken of instrument response times and differences in thesurfaces sampled by aircraft and ground-based systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auble, D. L. and Meyers, T. P.: 1992, 'An Open Path, Fast Response Infrared Absorption Gas Analyser for H2O and CO2', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 59, 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleugh, H. A., Raupach, M. R., Briggs, P. R., and Coppin, P. A.: 2004, 'Regional-Scale Heat and Water Vapour Fluxes in an Agricultural Landscape: An Evaluation of CBL Budget Methods at OASIS', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 110, 99–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, T. L., Dobosy, R. J., McMillen, R. T., Vogel, C. A., and Hicks, B. B.: 1996, 'Air-Surface Exchange Measurement in Heterogeneous Regions: Extending Tower Observations with Spatial Structure Observed from Small Aircraft', Global Change Biol. 2, 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, R. L., Hart, R. L., MacPherson, J. I., Schuepp, P. H., and Verma, S. B.: 1992, 'Aircraft-and Tower-Based Fluxes of Carbon Dioxide, Latent, and Sensible Heat', J. Geophys. Res. 97(D17), 18,477–18,485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, R. L., MacPherson, J. I., Shuepp, P. H., and Karanja, F.: 1989, 'An Evaluation of Aircraft Flux Measurements of CO2, Water Vapour and Sensible Heat', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 47, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobosy, R. J., Crawford, T. L., MacPherson, J. I., Desjardins, R. L., Kelly, R. D., Oncley, S. P., and Lenschow, D. H.: 1997, 'Intercomparison among Four Flux Aircraft at BOREAS in 1994', J. Geophys. Res. 102(D24), 29,101–29,111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, A. J., Garratt, J. R., Francey, R. J., McIlroy, I. C., Bacon, N. E., Hyson, P., Bradley, E. F., Denmead, O. T., Tsvang, L. R., Volkov, Y. A., Koprov, B. M., Elagina, L. G., Sahashi, K., Monji, N., Hanafusa, T., TsuKamoto, O., Frenzen, P., Hicks, B. B., Wesely, M., Miyake, M., and Shaw, W.: 1982, 'An International Turbulence Comparison Experiment (ITCE 1976)', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 24, 181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, D., Lamb, B., Leclerc, M. Y., and Horst, T. W.: 1996, 'Experimental Evaluation of Analytical and Lagrangian Surface-Layer Flux Footprint Models', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 80, 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. E., Judd, M. J., McAneney, K. J., Astill, M. S., and Prendergast, P. T.: 1994, 'A Rapid Response 2-D Drag Anemometer for Atmospheric Turbulence Measurements', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 57, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. M. and Schwerdtfeger, P.: 1988, The F.I.A.M.S. Research Aircraft System Description, FIAMS Technical Report No. 8, Flinders University of South Australia, 60 pp.

  • Horst, T. W.: 2001, 'Comment on “Footprint Analysis: A Closed Analytical Solution Based on Height-Dependent Profiles of Wind Speed and Eddy Viscosity”', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 101, 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, T. W. and Weil, J. C.: 1992, 'Footprint Estimation for Scalar Flux Measurements in the Atmospheric Surface Layer', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 59, 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inverarity, G. W.: 2000, 'Correcting Airborne Temperature Data for Lags Introduced by Instruments with Two-Time-Constant Responses' J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech. 17, 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, P. and McAneney, J.: 1997, 'The OASIS Experience: Comparison of Aircraft and Tower-Based Flux Measurements', Wea. Clim. 17, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaharabata, S. K., Schuepp, P. H., Ogunjemiyo, S., Shen, S., Leclerc, M. Y., Desjardins, R. L., and MacPherson, J. I.: 1997, 'Footprint Considerations in BOREAS', J. Geophys. Res. 102, 29,113–29,124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: 1994, Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 289 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. D., Smith, E. A., and MacPherson J. I.: 1992, 'A Comparison of Surface Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes from Aircraft and Surface Measurements in FIFE 1987', J. Geophys. Res. 97(D17), 18,445–18,453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leise, J. and Masters, M., 1991, Wind Measurement from Aircraft, Unpublished Report, Aircraft Operations Centre, NOAA, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow, D. H. and Stankov, B. B.: 1986, 'Length Scales in the Convective Boundary Layer', J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 1198–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuning, R., Raupach, M. R., Coppin, P. A., Cleugh, H. A., Isaac, P., Denmead, O. T., Dunin, F. X., Zegelin, S., and Hacker, J.: 2004, 'Spatial and Temporal Variations in Fluxes of Energy, Water Vapour and Carbon Dioxide during OASIS 1994 and 1995', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 110, 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucotte, M. and Saï d, F.: 1996, 'Comparaison des Mesures de Flux de Surface Obtenues par Avion ou par Stations Sol au Cours de L'expérience HAPEX Sahel', in Proceedings Atelier Expérimentation et Instrumentation, 15–17 October, Meteo-Fance, Toulouse.

  • Mahrt, L.: 1997, 'Flux Sampling Errors for Aircraft and Towers', J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech. 15, 416–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. and Lenschow, D. H.: 1994, 'Errors in Airborne Flux Measurements', J. Geophys. Res. 99(D7), 14,519–14,526.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.: 1973, 'A Method for Correcting Airborne Temperature Data for Sensor Response Time', J. Appl. Meteorol. 12, 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke, T.: 1987, Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd edn., Routledge, Cambridge, 435 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. A., Friehe, C. A., and Edwards, D. K.: 1994, 'Time and Frequency Response of a Resistance-Wire Aircraft Atmospheric Temperature Sensor', J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech. 11, 463–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. P.: 1994, Source Areas for Scalars and Scalar Fluxes', Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 67, 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, B. D., Swiatek, E., and Greene, J. P.: 1993, 'Density Fluctuations and Use of the Krypton Hygrometer in Surface Flux Measurements', in Proceedings of Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems Meeting, 21–23 July, Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ulden, A. P.: 1978, 'Simple Estimates for Vertical Diffusion from Sources near the Ground', Atmos. Environ. 12, 2125–2129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. B., Kanemasn, E. T., and Tanner, C. B.: 1990, 'Modified Heat-Meter Method for Determining Soil Heat Flux', Agric. For. Meteorol. 49, 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I., and Leuning, R.: 1980, 'Correction of Flux Measurements for Density Effects due to Heat and Water Vapour Transfer', Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 106, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. P. R. Isaac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Mcaneney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Leuning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. M. Hacker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaac, P.R., Mcaneney, J., Leuning, R. et al. Comparison of Aircraft and Ground-Based FluxMeasurements during OASIS95. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 110, 39–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026002301152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026002301152

Search

Navigation