Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Todd, M., Brummett, B. H., Shaw, L. L., and Aldeguer, C. M. R. (1995). Empathy and the collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68: 619-631.
Google Scholar
Bethwaite, J., and Tompkinson, P. (1996). The ultimatum game and non-selfish utility functions. J. Econ. Psychol. 17: 259-271.
Google Scholar
Binmore, K., Shaked, A., and Sutton, J. (1985). Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study. Am. Econ. Rev. 75: 1178-1180.
Google Scholar
Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren't fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 63: 131-144.
Google Scholar
Blount, S., and Bazerman, M. H. (1996). The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 30: 227-240.
Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., and Frey, B. S. (1996). Beyond anonymity in dictator games. In Roland-Lévy, C. (ed.), Social and Economic Representations. Conference Proceedings for the 21st IAREP Annual Colloquium, Université René Descartes Paris V, Paris, France, pp. 74-86.
Google Scholar
Bolton, G. E., and Zwick, R. (1995). Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games Econ. Behav. 10: 95-121.
Google Scholar
Bosman, R., Sonnemans, J., and Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Emotions, Rejections, and Cooling Off in the Ultimatum Game. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F., and Loewenstein, G. (in press). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M. (eds.), Advances in Behavioral Economics, Sage, New York.
Camerer, C. F., and Thaler, R. H. (1995). Ultimatums, dictators and manners. J. Econ. Perspect. 9: 209-219.
Google Scholar
Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Evidence from Indonesia. Econ. Inq. 37: 47-59.
Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. (in press). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behav. Brain Sci.
Croson, R. T. A. (1996). Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 30: 197-213.
Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Lualhati, J. C., and McCusker, C. M. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames on satisfaction with self-other outcome differences. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 24: 497-510.
Google Scholar
Eckel, C., and Grossman, P. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games Econ. Behav. 16: 181-191.
Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., and Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econ. Behav. 6: 347-369.
Google Scholar
Gibbons, F. X., and Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: The development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 129-142.
Google Scholar
Güth, W. (1995). On ultimatum bargaining experiments: A personal review. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 27, 329-344.
Google Scholar
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., and Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum games. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3: 367-388.
Google Scholar
Güth, W., and Tietz, R. (1986). Auctioning ultimatum bargaining position. In Scholz, R. W. (ed.), Current Issues in West German Decision Research, Lang, Frankfurt, Germany, 60-73.
Google Scholar
Güth, W., and Tietz, R. (1988). Ultimatum bargaining for a shrinking cake: An experimental analysis. In Tietz, R., Albers, W., and Selten, R. (eds.), Bounded Rational Behavior in Experimental Games and Markets, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 111-128.
Google Scholar
Güth, W., and Tietz, R. (1990). Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results. J. Econ. Psychol. 11: 417-449.
Google Scholar
Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., and Vermunt, R. (2002). Evaluability in Ultimatum Games. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., and Vermunt, R. (2003a). The salience of a recipient's alternatives: Inter-and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 90: 165-177.
Google Scholar
Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., and Vermunt, R. (2003b). Less Power or Powerless? Where Self Interest Ends and Fairness Begins in Social Decision-Making. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2003). Economic Man in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., and Smith, V. L. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econ. Behav. 7: 346-380.
Google Scholar
Hofmann, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. L. (1996a). On expectations and monetary stakes in ultimatum games. Int. J. Game Theory 25: 289-302.
Google Scholar
Hofmann, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. L. (1996b). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Am. Econ. Rev. 86: 653-660.
Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., and Spitzer, M. L. (1982). The Coase Theorem: Some experimental tests. J. Law Econ. 25: 73-98.
Google Scholar
Kagel, J. H., Kim, C., and Moser, D. (1996). Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games Econ. Behav. 13: 100-110.
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J. Bus. 59: 285-300.
Google Scholar
Knez, M. J., and Camerer, C. F. (1995). Outside options and social comparison in three-player ultimatum game experiments. Games Econ. Behav. 10: 65-94.
Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G., and Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. J. Pers. 54: 576-592.
Google Scholar
Kuhlman, D. M., and Marshello, A. F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32: 922-931.
Google Scholar
Larrick, R. P., and Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 810-825.
Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., and Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 426-441.
Google Scholar
Messick, D. M. (1995). Equality, fairness, and social conflict. Soc. Justice Res. 8: 153-173.
Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., and McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 4: 1-25.
Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 15: 389-399.
Google Scholar
Neelin, J., Spiegel, M., and Sonnenschein, H. (1988). A further test of noncooperative bargaining behavior: Comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 78: 824-836.
Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., and Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289: 1773-1775.
Google Scholar
Ochs, J., and Roth, A. E. (1989). An experimental study of sequential bargaining. Am. Econ. Rev. 79: 355-84.
Google Scholar
Pillutla, M. M., and Murnighan, J. K. (1995). Being fair or appearing fair: Strategic behavior in ultimatum bargaining. Acad. Manage. J. 38: 1408-1426.
Google Scholar
Pillutla, M. M., and Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 68: 208-224.
Google Scholar
Roth, A. E. (1988). Laboratory experiments in economics: A methodological overview. Econ. J. 98: 974-1031.
Google Scholar
Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., and Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 81: 1068-1095.
Google Scholar
Slonim, R., and Roth, A. E. (1998). Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica 66: 569-596.
Google Scholar
Straub, P. G., and Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 27: 345-364.
Google Scholar
Suleiman, R. (1996). Expectations and fairness in a modified ultimatum game. J. Econ. Psychol. 17: 531-554.
Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. J. Econ. Perspect. 2: 195-206.
Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1992). The Winner's Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Google Scholar
Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., and Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2003). Social Value Orientations and the Strategic Use of Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Van Dijk, E., and Vermunt, R. (2000). Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36: 1-25.
Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 337-349.
Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., and Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the morality effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 126-141.
Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, M., and Beattie, J. (1997). Consequences of regret aversion: 2. Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Deci. Processess 72: 63-78.
Google Scholar